Animal Organ Dissections in High Schools: Is There More than just Cutting?

References

• Beekman, L. (2000). Problem-solving and decision-making strategies and skills. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., & Lubben, F. (2006). Context-based chemistry: The Salter's approach. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 999–1015. doi: 10.1080/09500690600702496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowd, A. D. (1993). Dissection as an instructional technique in high science: Choice and alternatives. Society and Animals, 1(1), 83–88. doi: 10.1163/156853093X00163
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Capps, D. K., Constas M. A., & Crawford, B. A. (2012). A review of empirical literature on enquiry professional development: Alignment with best practices and a critique of the findings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(3), 291–318. doi: 10.1007/s10972-012-9275-2
   Google Scholar
• Cotic, M., & Zuljan, M. (2009). Problem-based instruction in mathematics and its impact on the cognitive results of the students and on affective-motivational aspects. Educational Studies, 35(3), 297–310. doi: 10.1080/03055690802648085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative enquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education, (2003). The National Curriculum Statement. Grades 10–12 (Life Sciences). Government Printers. Retrieved February 2, 2013 from http://www.education.gov.za
   Google Scholar
• De Villiers, J. J. R., & Monk, M. (2005). The first cut is the deepest: Reflections on the state of animal dissection in biology education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(5), 583–600. doi: 10.1080/00220270500041523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fancˇovicˇová J., Prokop, P., & Lešková, A. (2013). Perceived disgust and personal experiences are associated with acceptance of dissections in schools. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(3), 311–318. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2013.938a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, S., Peat, M., & Lewis, A. (2002). Traditional versus computer-based dissections in enhancing learning in a tertiary setting: A student perspective. Journal of Biological Education, 36(3), 124–129. doi: 10.1080/00219266.2002.9655817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handelsman, J. (2004). Scientific teaching. Science, 304, 521–522. doi: 10.1126/science.1096022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, L. A., Wood, M. W., & Hart, B. L. (2008). Why dissection? Animal use in education. London: Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundation for the 21st century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54. doi: 10.1002/sce.10106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holstermann, N., Grube, D., & Bögeholz, S. (2010). Hands-on activities and their influence on students’ interest. Research in Science Education, 40(5), 743–757. doi: 10.1007/s11165-009-9142-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapan, R. T. (2004). Career development across K–16 years: Bridging the present to satisfying and successful futures. Alexandria, VA: American Counselling Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lock, R. (1994). Dissection as an instructional technique in high science. Society and animals, 2(1), 67–73. doi: 10.1163/156853094X00081
   Google Scholar
• Lock, R., & Millett, K. (1991). The animals and science education project, 1990–1991. School of Education, University of Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• McCain, T. (2005). Teaching for tomorrow: Teaching content and problem-solving skills. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, R. (2004). The role of practical work in the teaching and learning of science. Paper prepared for the Committee: High school Science laboratories: Role and vision, National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC. York: University of York.
   Google Scholar
• Millett, K., & Lock, R. (1992). GCSE learners’ attitudes towards animal use: Some implications for biology/science teachers. Journal of Biological Education, 26(3),204–208. doi: 10.1080/00219266.1992.9655274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabi, R. L. (2002). The theoretical versus the lay meaning of disgust: Implications for emotion research. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 695–703. doi: 10.1080/02699930143000437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Science Teachers Association (2005). Responsible use of live animals and dissection in the science classroom. Retrieved November 20, 2013 from www.nsta.org/about/positions/animals
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, J. (2012). Science teachers and the dissection debate: Perspectives on animal dissection and alternatives. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 7(2), 254–267.
   Google Scholar
• Offner, S. (1993). Importance of dissection. The American Biology Teacher, 55(3), 147–149. doi: 10.2307/4449611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preszler, R. W., Dawe, A., Shuster, C. B., & Shuster, M. (2007). Assessment of the effects of student response systems on student learning and attitudes over a broad range of Biology courses. CBE Life Sciences Education, 6(1), 29–41. doi: 10.1187/cbe.06-09-0190
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Randler, C., Wust-Ackermann, P., Vollmer C., & Hummel, E. (2012). The relationship between disgust, state-anxiety and motivation during a dissection task. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 419–424. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roehrig, G. H., Dubinsky, J. M., MacNabb, C., Michlin, M., & Schmitt, L. (2012). Teaching neuroscience to science teachers: Facilitating the translation of enquiry-based teaching instruction to the classroom. Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 413–424. doi: 10.1187/cbe.12-04-0045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, R., & Arline, C. (2009). Uncovering student thinking in mathematics grades 6–12. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P. S., Banilower, E. R., McMahon, K. C., & Weiss, I. R. (2002). The national survey of science and mathematics education: Trends from 1977 to 2000. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research. Retrieved September 30, 2013 from http://2000survey.horizon-research.com/reports/trends.php
   Google Scholar