Debiasing the curse of knowledge and audit judgement: Experience reconsidered

REFERENCES

• Abdolmohammadi, M. & A. Wright (1997). An Examination of the Effects of Experience and Task Complexity on Audit Judgments, The Accounting Review, 62:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B.H. & M. Maletta (1994). Auditor Attendance to Negative and Positive Information: The Effect of Experience-Related Differences, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 6:1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J.C., Jennings, M.M., Lowe, D.J. & P.M. Reckers (1997). The Mitigation of Hindsight Bias in Judges' Evaluations of Auditor Decisions, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 16:20–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, U. & W.F. Wright (1998). Expertise and the Explanation Effect, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 42:250–269.
   Google Scholar
• Bedard, J.C. & S.F. Biggs (1991). The Effect of Domain-Specific Experience on Evaluation of Management Representations in Analytical Procedures, Auditing: A Journal of Practice of Theory, 10:77–95.
   Google Scholar
• Bonner, S.E. (1990). Experience Effects in Auditing: The Role of Task-Specific Knowledge, The Accounting Review, 65:72–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonner, S.E. & B.L. Lewis (1990). Determinants of Auditor Expertise, Journal of Accounting Research, 28:1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonner, S.E., Libby, R. & M.W. Nelson (1996). Using Decision Aids to Improve Auditors' Conditional Probability Judgments, The Accounting Review, 71:221–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butt, J.L. & T.L. Campbell (1999). The Effects of Information Order and Hypothesis Testing Strategies on Auditors' Judgments, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 14:471–479.
   Google Scholar
• Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G. & M. Weber (1999). The Curse of Knowledge in Economic Settings: An Experimental Analysis, Journal of Political Economy, 97:1232–1254.
   Google Scholar
• Choo, F. & K.T. Trotman (1991). The Relationship Between Knowledge Structure and Judgments for Experienced and Inexperienced Auditors, The Accounting Review, 66:464–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarkson, P.M., Emby, C. & V. Watt (1999). Debiasing the Effect of Outcome Knowledge: The Role of Instructions, Accounting Association of Australia and New Zealand Annual Conference, Cairns, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L.J. (1991). Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests, Psychometrika, 16:297–334.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J.T. (1996). Experience and Auditors' Selection of Relevant Information for Preliminary Control Risk Assessments, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 15:16–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emby, C. (1994). Framing and Presentation Mode Effects in Professional Judgment: Auditors' Internal Control Judgments and Substantive Testing Decisions, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 13:102–115.
   Google Scholar
• Fischhoff, B. (1997) Perceived Informativeness of Facts, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3:349–358.
   Google Scholar
• Gadh, V.M., Krishnan, R. & J.M. Peters (1993). Modeling Internal Controls and Their Evaluation, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 12:113–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackenbrack, K. (1993). The Effect of Experience with Different Sized Clients on Auditor Evaluations of Fraudulent Financial Reporting Indicators, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 12:99–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, S.A. & R. Hastie (1990). Hindsight: Biased Judgements of Past Events after Outcomes are Known, Psychological Bulletin, 107:311–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heiman, V.B. (1990). Auditors' Assessments of the Likelihood of Error Explanations in Analytical Review, The Accounting Review, 65:875–890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heintz, J.A. & G.B. White (1999). Auditor Judgment in Analytical Review—Some Further Evidence, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 8:22–39.
   Google Scholar
• Hermanson, H.M. (1997). The Effects of Audit Structure and Experience on Auditors' Decisions to Isolate Errors, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 9:76–93.
   Google Scholar
• Hogarth, R.M. & H.J. Einhorn (1992). Order Effects in Belief Updating: The Belief-Adjustment Model, Cognitive Psychology, 24:1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, H. (1991). The Effect of Posterior Beliefs and Exogenous Hypotheses on Auditors' Information Search Strategies, Master of Economics (Honours) dissertation, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, J. (1993). Debiasing Audit Judgment with Accountability: A Framework and Experimental Results, Journal of Accounting Research, 31:231–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, J. (1995) Debiasing the Curse of Knowledge in Audit Judgment, The Accounting Review, 70:249–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, D.S. & D.D. Ward (1994). The Effects of Audit Task on Evidence Integration and Belief Revision, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 6:21–42.
   Google Scholar
• King, J., Welker, R. & G. Keller (1994). The Effects of Independence Allegation of Peer Review Evaluation of Audit Procedures, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 6:72–91.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinmuntz, D.N. (1995). Cognitive Heuristics and Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Environment, Management Science, 31:680–702.
   Google Scholar
• Koonce, L. (1992). Explanation and Counterexplanation During Audit Analytical Review, The Accounting Review, 67:59–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koonce, L. (1993). A Cognitive Characterization of Audit Analytical Review, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 12:57–76.
   Google Scholar
• Krogstad, J.L., Ettenson, R.T. & J. Shateau (1994). Context and Experience in Auditors' Materiality Judgements, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 4:54–73.
   Google Scholar
• Libby, R., Artman, J.T. & J.T. Willingham (1995). Process Susceptibility, Control Risk, and Audit Planning, The Accounting Review, 60:212–230.
   Google Scholar
• Libby, R. & D.M. Frederick (1990). Experience and the Ability to Explain Audit Findings, Journal of Accounting Research, 28:348–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libby, R. & H. Tan (1994). Modeling the Determinants of Audit Expertise, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19:701–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libby, R. & K.T Trotman (1993). The Review Process as a Control for Differential Recall of Evidence in Auditor Judgments, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18:559–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe, DJ. & P.M.J. Reckers (1994). The Effects of Hindsight Bias on Jurors' Evaluation of Auditor Decision, Decision Sciences, 25:401–426.
   Google Scholar
• Marchant, G. (1990). Discussion of Determinants of Auditor Expertise, Journal of Accounting Research, 28:21–28.
   Google Scholar
• McDaniel, L.S. & W.R. Kinney (1995). “Expectation-Formation Guidance in the Auditor's Review of Interim Financial Information”, Journal of Accounting Research, 33:59–76.
   Google Scholar
• Messier, W.F. Jr. & R.M. Tubbs (1994). Recency Effects in Belief Revision: The Impact of Audit Experience and the Review Process, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 13:57–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J.C. (1998). Psychometric Theory. 2nd Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Peecher, M.E. & D.N. Kleinmuntz (1991). Discussion of Experimental Evidence on the Effects of Accountability on Auditor Judgments, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 10:108–113.
   Google Scholar
• Reimers, J.L. & S.A. Butler (1992). The Effect of Outcome Knowledge on Auditors' Judgmental Evaluations, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17:185–194.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J.F. & T. Kida (1991). Heuristics and Biases: Expertise and Task Realism in Auditing, Psychological Bulletin, 109:472–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spector, P.E. (1992). Summated Rating Scale Construction: An Introduction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Trotman, K.T. & A. Wright (1996). Recency Effects: Task Complexity, Decision Mode, and Task-Specific Experience, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 8:175–193.
   Google Scholar
• Trotman, K. T. (1996). Research Methods for Judgments and Decision Making Studies in Auditing, Melbourne: Coopers & Lybrand and Accounting Association of Australia and New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Trotman, K. T. (1998). Audit Judgement Research—Issues Addressed, Research Methods and Future Directions, Accounting & Finance, 38:115–156.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, S. & A.M. Wright (1997). The Effects of Industry Experience on Hypothesis Generation and Audit Planning Decisions, Behavioral Research in Accounting, 9:273–294.
   Google Scholar