Researching in the middle ground

References

• Abdel-khalik, A. R. and Ajinkya, B. B. (1979). Empirical Research in Accounting: a Methodological Viewpoint, Accounting Education Series, 4, American Accounting Association.
   Google Scholar
• Burrell, G., and Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis, Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life, London: Heineman Educational Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Chua, W. F. (1986). Radical developments in accounting thought, The Accounting Review, LXI(4): 601–632.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, D. and Sherer, M. (1984). The value of corporate accounting reports:arguments for a political economy of accounting. Accounting Organisations & Society, 9(3/4): 207–232.
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. F. (1991). Accounting as a critical social science. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 4(1): 8–28.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend (1978). Science in a Free Society. New Left Books, Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, A. and Powell, J. (1994). Accountability and accounting: using naturalistic methodology to enhance organizational control – a case study. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 7(2): 50–69.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G. and Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth Generation Evaluation. Sage Publications: USA.
   Google Scholar
• Hines, R. D. (1989). The sociopolitical paradigm in financial accounting research. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, 2(1): 52–76.
   Google Scholar
• Hooks, J., Coy, D., and Davey, H. (2001). The annual reports of New Zealand electricity companies: Assessing quality. Pacific Accounting Review, 13(2): 35–69.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(3): 305–360.
   Google Scholar
• Laughlin, R. (1981). On the nature of accounting methodology. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 8(3): 329–351.
   Google Scholar
• Laughlin, R. (1987). Accounting Systems in Organisational Contexts: A case for Critical Theory. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 12(5): 479–502.
   Google Scholar
• Laughlin, R. (1995). Methodological themes Empirical research in accounting:alternative approaches and a case for “middle-range” thinking. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8(1): 63–87.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S. and Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Enquiry. Sage Publications, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Marston, C. L. and Shrives, P. J. (1991). The use of disclosure indices in accounting research: a review article. British Accounting Review, 23: 195–210.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. (1984). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: toward a shared craft. Educational Researcher, 13: 20–30.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G. (1983). Social science and accounting research: a commentary on Tomkins and Groves. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 8(4): 385–388.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G. and Smircich, L. (1980). The case for qualitative research. Academy of Management Review, 5(4): 491–500.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, L. W. (1984). The “interpretive humanistic” approach to social science and accounting research. Discussion paper series no. 28, Department of Accounting & Finance, Massey University, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd edition). Newbury Park, CA., Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reichardt, C. S. and Rallis, S. F. (1994). The Qualitative-Quantitative Debate: New Perspectives. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Tomkins, C. and Groves, R. (1983a). The everyday accountant and researching his reality. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 8(4): 361–374.
   Google Scholar
• Tomkins, C. and Groves, R. (1983b). “The everyday accountant and researching his reality”: further thoughts. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 8(4): 407–415.
   Google Scholar