Remuneration Committees in South African Listed Companies

References

• “Key Drivers of ‘Good’ Corporate Governance and the appropriateness of UK policy responses” p25
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, D.R., Sweeney, D.J. Williams, T.A. (1990). Sampling and sampling distributions in statistics for business and economics. West Publishing Company, St. Paul MN. 247.
   Google Scholar
• Anglo American plc Annual Report to Shareholders including Report of the Remuneration committee.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong Merlis, H. (2004). Reward Management, Anthony Rowe, Chippenham.
   Google Scholar
• Barak, R., Cohen, S. and Lauterbach, B., (2008). The effect of CEO pay on firm valuation in closely held firms. Abstract of working paper. [Online]. Available from the UCT Libraries Website: Social Sciences Research Network at [2009, July, 16].
   Google Scholar
• Bebchuk, L. Fried, J. (2004). Pay without performance, The unfulfilled promise of executive compensation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berle, A. A. Mearns, G. C. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, P., Scheinkman, J.A. and Xiong, W., (2007). Pay for short-term performance: Executive compensation in speculative markets SSRN-ECGI – Finance Working Paper No. 79/2005.
   Google Scholar
• Cadbury, A. (1992). The code of Best Practice on Corporate Governance. The Corporate Governance Overview (Cadbury Report). World Bank Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance. London: Gee and Co. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Coakley, J. Iliopoulou, S. (2006). Bidder CEO and other executive compensation in UK M. As. European Financial Management, 12(4):609–631.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. Lauterbach, B. (2007). Differences in pay between owner and non-owner CEOs: Evidence from Israel. Journal of Multi-Financial Management. 18:4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Companies Act Number 61 of 1973 and latterly Number 71 of 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Coombes, P. Watson, M., (2000). Three surveys on Corporate Governance. McKinsey Quarterly, (December 2000), 74.
   Google Scholar
• Crotty, A. Bonorchis, R. (2006). Executive pay in South Africa. Who gets what and why. Cape Town: Juta Co Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J. Powell, W. W., (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review 48:147–160.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, M. Ozkan, A. (2008). Institutional Investors and Director Pay: An empirical study of UK companies. Journal of Multinational Financial Management. 18(1):1–351.
   Google Scholar
• Duffhues, P. Kabir, R. (2008). Is the pay-performance relationship always positive? Evidence from the Netherlands. Journal of Multinational Financial Management. 18(1):45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Ezzamel, M. Watson, R. (1998). Market comparison earnings and the bidding up of executive cash compensation. Evidence from the Unit. The Academy of Management Journal. 41(2):221–231.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, N., (2008). EC Board compensation and firm performance: The role of independent board members. The Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 18:30–44.
   Google Scholar
• Finweek, (2007), S.A.’s Biggest Investor – What does he really want, 26th July, 2007: 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hampel, R. (1998), The Hampel Committee on Corporate Governance. Final Report to The European Corporate Governance Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Higgs Report, (2007) by Igor Filatotchev, Gregory Jackson, Howard Gospel and Deborah Allcock
   Google Scholar
• Hilmer, F.G.,(1993), An exploration of board remuneration committee challenges. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 47, No. 2, 201–218
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, C.H. Kleiner, B.H. (2003).New developments in executive compensation. Management Research News. 6(7):72–78.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M.C. Meckling, W.H. (2000), Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. In A Theory of the Firm: governance, residual claims, and organizational forms. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M.C. Murphy, K.J. (1998). CEO Incentives: It’s not how much you pay, but how. In Foundations of organisational strategy, Jensen, M.C Ed. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. 270–298.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M.C. Murphy, K.J. (1998). Performance pay and top-management incentives. In Foundations of organisational Strategy, Jensen, M.C Ed. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. 229–269.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M.C. Ruback, R.S. (1983), “The market for corporate control” in the Journal of Financial Economics, 11: 5–50.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M.C. Smith, C.W. (Jr.) (1984) “The theory of corporate finance: A historical overview” In the modern theory of corporate finance Mc Graw-Hill, New York, pp 2 – 20.
   Google Scholar
• King, Committee, (2002). King Report on Corporate Governance for South Africa, Parklands, South Africa. Institute of Directors in Southern Africa, Parktown, South Africa
   Google Scholar
• Landsberg, R.D., (2007). Understanding the role of a corporate compensation committee. Journal of Financial Service Professionals 22.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., Rowan, B., (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340.
   Google Scholar
• Mongalo, T. (2003). Shareholder activism in the United Kingdom highlights the failure of remuneration committees: Lessons for South Africa. The South African Law Journal. 120: 756–766.
   Google Scholar
• Ogden, S Watson, R, (2004). Remuneration Committees and CEO pay in the UK Privatized Water Industry. Socio-Economic Review, Vol. 2, pp. 33–63, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Ozkan, N., (2007). CEO Compensation and firm performance: An Empirical investigation of UK panel data. School of Economics, Finance and Management. University of Bristol, UK, 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Ozkan, N., (2007). Do Corporate Governance mechanisms influence CEO compensation? An empirical investigation in to UK companies. The Journal of Multinational Financial Management. 17(5):349–364.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson plc. (2006). Report on Directors’ Remuneration. In Pearson Annual Report 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Penkin, K.D. (2009). An analysis of the perceived effectiveness of RCs in deciding on executive compensation in South African listed companies. A thesis. University of Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J.: (1998), ‘Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment’. Administrative Science Quarterly 17: 218–229.
   Google Scholar
• SAB Miller plc. Annual Report to Shareholders including Report of the Remuneration committee.
   Google Scholar
• Spira, L. F. Bender, R., (2004). Compare and Contrast: Perspectives on board committees. Corporate Governance: An International Review. 12(4):489–499.
   Google Scholar
• Stredwick, J. (2000). Aligning rewards to organisational goals – A multinational’s experience. European Business Review, 12, 9–19.
   Google Scholar
• The Higgs Report (2003): Review of the role and effectiveness of non-executive directors, U.K.
   Google Scholar
• The Institute of Directors, (2008). Sustainability critical in Good Corporate Governance of the Future, Bulletin. Institute of Directors Website. Accessed, 13 November 2009.
   Google Scholar
• The London Stock Exchange, (2002). Corporate Governance. A Practical Guide.
   Google Scholar
• Tricker, R. (1978). – A study of the non-executive director and of the audit committee; The Independent Director, London, 1978, 1.1.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, M.,(1998) Disclosure Remuneration: A gap in the rules. Corporate Governance: An international Review. 6(1):48–51.
   Google Scholar
• Westphal, J.D., Zajac, E.J. (1994). Substance and symbolism in CEO long term incentive plans. Administrative Science Quarterly. 39(3): 367–390.
   Google Scholar