References
- Alfarano, S., Lux, T., & Milakovic, M. (2008). The small core of the German corporate board network ( Working Paper 1446). Kiel: Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
- Battiston, S., & Catanzaro, M. (2003). Statistical properties of corporate board and director networks. The European Physical Journal B – Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 38, 345–352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2004-00127-8
- Companies Act, No. 71 of 2008 (2008). Pretoria: Department of Trade and Industry.
- Conyon, M. J., & Muldoon, M. R. (2006a). The small-world of corporate boards in Singapore (WSRC Paper 2006/3–2). Retrieved from https://mercury.smu.edu.sg/rsrchpubupload/7261/c2006-3-2.pdf
- Conyon, M. J., & Muldoon, M. R. (2006b). The small world of corporate boards. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33, 1321–1343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00634.x
- Conyon, M. J., & Muldoon, M. R. (2007). Ownership and control: A small-world analysis. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1083425
- Cronin, B. (2011). Networks of corporate power revisited. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 10, 43–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.01.007
- Davis, G. F., Yoo, M., & Baker, W. E. (2003). The small world of the American corporate elite, 1982–2001. Strategic Organization, 1, 301–326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14761270030013002
- Devos, E., Prevost, A., & Puthenpurackal, J. (2009). Are interlocked directors effective monitors? Financial Management, 38, 861–887. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2009.01059.x
- Dooley, P. C. (1969). The interlocking directorate. The American Economic Review, 59, 314–323.
- Harris, I. C., & Shimizu, K. (2004). Too busy to serve? An examination of the influence of overboarded directors. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 775–798. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00453.x
- Heemskerk, E. M., & Schnyder, G. (2008). Small states, international pressures, and interlocking directorates: The cases of Switzerland and The Netherlands. European Management Review, 5, 41–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/emr.2008.3
- Hermalin, B., & Weisbach, M. (2003). Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature. Economic Policy Review, 9(1), 7–27.
- Institute of Directors of South Africa (IoDSA). (2009). King Code of Governance for South Africa 2009 (King III). Johannesburg: IoDSA.
- Jackson, M. O. (2006). The economics of social networks. In: R, Blundell, R. Newey, & T. Persson. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 9th World Congress of the Econometric Society (pp. 1–56). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Meeusen, W., & Cuyvers, L. (1985). The interaction between interlocking directorships and the economic behaviour of companies. In F. N. Stokman, R. Ziegler, & J. Scott (Eds.), Networks of corporate power: A comparative analysis of ten countries (pp. 45–72). Oxford: Polity Press.
- Mizruchi, M. S. (1996). What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 271–298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.271
- Newman, M. E. J. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45, 167–256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/S003614450342480
- Santella, P., Drago, C., Polo, A., & Gagliardi, E. (2008). A comparison of the director networks of the main listed companies in France, Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom, and the United States (MPRA Paper No. 16397). Retrieved from MPRA: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/16397/
- Seakamela, P. (2011). An investigation of the concept of independent director with specific reference to the King III Report and how companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) apply the King III codes (Unpublished master's thesis). Stellenbosch University, South Africa.
- Windolf, P., & Beyer, J. (1996). Co-operative capitalism: Corporate networks in Germany and Britain. The British Journal of Sociology, 47, 205–231. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/591724