Taxation students’ perceptions of open-book assessment: a follow-up interactive qualitative analysis

References

• AERA (American Educational Research Association). (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: AERA.
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal, P. K., & Roediger, H. L. III. (2011). Expectancy of an open-book test decreases performance on a delayed closed-book test. Memory, 19, 836–852. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2011.613840
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baillie, C., & Toohey, S. (1997). The “power test”: Its impact on student learning in a material science course for engineering students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 22, 33–48. doi: 10.1080/0260293970220103
   Google Scholar
• Boniface, D. (1985). Candidates’ use of notes and textbooks during an open-book examination. Educational Research, 27, 201–209. doi: 10.1080/0013188850270307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2003). Business research methods (International 8th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Coetzee, S., & Oberholzer, R. (2012). Education general information. In E. Evans, R. Juchau and RMS Wilson (Eds.), The interface of Accounting Education and professional training (pp. 99–120). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Du Preez, H., & Du Preez, C. S. (2012). Taxation students’ perceptions of open-book assessment prior to the qualifying examination of South African chartered accountants. SA Journal of Accounting Research, 26, 119–142.
   Google Scholar
• Durham, K. (1990). The open-book examination. Foundation for Education, Science and Technology, 24, 59.
   Google Scholar
• Eilertsen, T. V., & Valdermo, O. (2000). Open-book assessment: A contribution to improved learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 26, 91–103. doi: 10.1016/S0191-491X(00)00010-9
   Google Scholar
• Feller, M. (1994). Open-book testing and education for the future. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 20, 235–238. doi: 10.1016/0191-491X(94)90010-8
   Google Scholar
• Henning, E., Van Rensburg, W., & Smit, B. (2004). Finding your way in qualitative research. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
   Google Scholar
• Karagiannopoulou, E., & Milienos, F. S. (2013). Exploring the relationship between experienced students’ preference for open- and closed-book examinations, approaches to learning and achievement. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19, 271–296. doi: 10.1080/13803611.2013.765691
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, R. (2013). Alternative assessment methods for the online classroom. Online Classroom, 13(7): 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Koutselini-Ioannidou, M. (1997). Testing and life-long learning: Open-book and closed book examination in a university course. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23, 131–139. doi: 10.1016/S0191-491X(97)00008-4
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mampane, R., & Bouwer, C. (2011). The influence of township schools on the resilience of their learners. South African Journal of Education, 31, 114–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Msila, V. (2011). Open-book examinations in a distance (teacher) education programme: South African teacher-learner experiences. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 9(3), 1–12. doi: 10.4018/jdet.2011070101
   Google Scholar
• Northcutt, N., & McCoy, D. (2004). Interactive qualitative analysis: A systems method for qualitative research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rapley, T. (2004). Interviews. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 15–33). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, C. R., Livingston, R. B., & Willson, V. (2006). Measurement and assessment in education. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• SAICA (The South African Institute of Chartered Accountants). (2009). Open-book policy: Updated and approved by EDCO, February: #247318. Johannesburg: SAICA
   Google Scholar
• Struyven, K., Dochy, F., & Janssens, S. (2002, August). Students’ perceptions about assessment in higher education: A review. Paper presented at the Joint Northumbria/Earli SIG Assessment and Evaluation Conference, Newcastle, UK
   Google Scholar
• Theophilides, C., & Dionysiou, O. (1996). The major functions of the open-book examination at the university level: A factor analytic study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 22, 157–170. doi: 10.1016/0191-491X(96)00009-0
   Google Scholar
• Theophilides, C., & Koutselini-Ioannidou, M. (2000). Study behaviour in the closed-book and the open-book examination: A comparative analysis. Educational Research and Evaluation, An International Journal on Theory and Practice, 6, 379–393. doi: 10.1076/edre.6.4.379.6932
   Google Scholar
• Westerkamp, A. C., Heijne-Penninga, M., Kuks, J. B. M., & Cohen-Schotanus, J. (2013). Open-book tests: Search behaviour, time used and test scores. Medical Teacher, 35, 330–332. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.759641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar