Complex information and accounting standards: Evidence from UK narrative reporting

References

• Asay, H. S., Elliott, W. B., & Rennekamp, K. (2017). Disclosure readability and the sensitivity of investors’ valuation judgments to outside information. Accounting Review, 92(4), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asay, H. S., Libby, R., & Rennekamp, K. (2018). Firm performance, reporting goals, and language choices in narrative disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 65(2–3), 380–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae, K.-H., Tan, H., & Welker, M. (2008). International GAAP differences: The impact on foreign analysts. The Accounting Review, 83(3), 593–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattie, V. (2014). Accounting narratives and the narrative turn in accounting research: Issues, theory, methodology, methods and a research framework. British Accounting Review, 46(2), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, R. (2002). The incomplete revelation hypothesis and financial reporting. Accounting Horizons, 16(3), 233–243.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, R. (2008). Discussion of annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45(2–3), 248–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonsall, S. B., Leone, A. J., Miller, B. P., & Rennekamp, K. (2017). A plain English measure of financial reporting readability. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 63(2–3), 329–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, N., & Fast, G. (1999). Lingua::EN::Syllable Perl Module. Meta CPAN, Module version 0.30 https://metacpan.org/pod/Lingua::EN::Syllable
   Google Scholar
• Brochet, F., Jagolinzer, A. D., & Riedl, E. J. (2013). Mandatory IFRS adoption and financial statement comparability. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(4), 1373–1400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushee, B. J., Gow, I. D., & Taylor, D. J. (2018). Linguistic complexity in firm disclosures: Obfuscation or information? Journal of Accounting Research, 56(1), 85–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callen, J. L., Khan, M., & Lu, H. (2013). Accounting quality, stock price delay, and future stock returns. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30, 269–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01154.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, E., & Lau, J. (2016). Readability of notes to the financial statements and the adoption of IFRS. Australian Accounting Review, 26(2), 162–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2013). Mandatory IFRS reporting and changes in enforcement. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56(2, Suppl. 1), 147–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, H. B., Lee, E., Walker, M., & Zeng, C. (2015). Incentives or standards: What determines accounting quality changes around IFRS adoption? European Accounting Review, 24(1), 3–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtis, J. K. (2004). Corporate report obfuscation: Artefact or phenomenon? The British Accounting Review, 36(3), 291–312.
   Google Scholar
• De Franco, G., Hope, O., Vyas, D., & Zhou, Y. (2015). Analyst report readability. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32, 76–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempsey, S. J., Harrison, D. M., Luchtenberg, K. F., & Seiler, M. J. (2012). Financial opacity and firm performance: The readability of REIT annual reports. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 45(2), 450–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer, T., Lang, M., & Stice-Lawrence, L. (2017). The evolution of 10-K textual disclosure: Evidence from latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 64(2), 221–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EFRAG. (2014). Getting a better framework. COMPLEXITY Bulletin, European Financial Reporting Advisory Group. https://www.efrag.org/Activities/1604011051315205/Conceptual-Framework—Bulletin-Complexity.
   Google Scholar
• Efretuei, E. (2020a). Year and industry-level accounting narrative analysis: Readability and tone variation. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting. https://doi.org/10.2308/JETA-18-12-21-26
   Google Scholar
• Efretuei, E. (2020b). Financial and narrative reporting in EU company and securities law. In G.-B. Carsten (Ed.), Gore-Browne on EU Company Law (Issue 79, Ch. 20). Jordan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• El-Haj, M., Alves, P., Rayson, P., Walker, M., & Young, S. (2019). Retrieving, classifying and analysing narrative commentary in unstructured (glossy) annual reports published as PDF files. Accounting and Business Research, 50(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2019.1609346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filzen, J. J., & Peterson, K. (2015). Financial statement complexity and meeting analysts’ expectations. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(4), 1560–1594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, R., & Sidhu, B. K. (2017). The impact of mandatory IFRS adoption on investment efficiency: Standards, enforcement and reporting incentives. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2956781
   Google Scholar
• Guay, W., Samuels, D., & Taylor, D. (2016). Guiding through the fog: Financial statement complexity and voluntary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 62(2–3), 234–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2016.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan, M. M. (2018). Readability of narrative disclosures in 10-K reports: Does managerial ability matter? European Accounting Review, 29(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2018.1528169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IASB. (2017). Disclosure initiative – Principles of disclosure. Discussion Paper DP/2017/1, International Accounting Standards Board. www.ifrs.org
   Google Scholar
• James, D. (2018). Lingua::EN::Splitter module. Module version 0.1 [cited 29/09/2018]. https://metacpan.org/pod/Lingua::EN::Splitter
   Google Scholar
• Jegadeesh, N., & Wu, D. (2013). Word power: A new approach for content analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 110(3), 712–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.08.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, C., Wang, K., & Zhang, L. (2019), Readability of 10-K reports and stock price crash risk. Contemporary Account Research, 36, 1184–1216. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, M., & Stice-Lawrence, L. (2015). Textual analysis and international financial reporting: Large sample evidence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60(2–3), 110–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, A. (2013). Individual investors and financial disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56(1), 130–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. (2012). The effect of quarterly report readability on information efficiency of stock prices. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29, 1137–1170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01152.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehavy, R., Li, F., & Merkley, K. (2011). The effect of annual report readability on analyst following and the properties of their earnings forecasts. The Accounting Review, 86(3),1087–1115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuz, C., & Wysocki, P. D. (2016). The economics of disclosure and financial reporting regulation: Evidence and suggestions for future research. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(2), 525–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, F. (2008). Annual report readability, current earnings, and earnings persistence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45(2–3), 221–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, K., Ramos, F., & Rogo, R. (2017). Earnings management and annual report readability. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 63(1), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2011). When is a liability not a liability? Textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10-Ks. The Journal of Finance, 66(1), 35–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2014). Measuring readability in financial disclosures. The Journal of Finance, 69(4), 1643–1671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, C. D., & Schutze, H. (2003). Foundations of statistical natural language processing. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merkl-Davies, D. M., & Brennan, N. M. (2007). Discretionary disclosure strategies in corporate narratives: Incremental information or impression management? Journal of Accounting Literature, 26, 116–194.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, B. P. (2010). The effects of reporting complexity on small and large investor trading. The Accounting Review, 85(6), 36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neel, M. (2017). Accounting comparability and economic outcomes of mandatory IFRS adoption. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34, 658–690. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennekamp, K. (2012). Processing fluency and investors’ reactions to disclosure readability. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(5), 1319–1354. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2012.00460.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, G., & Staden, C. V. (2015). The readability impact of International Financial Reporting Standards. Pacific Accounting Review, 27(3), 282–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, G. W., & Parker, L. (2016). A comment on “The struggle to fabricate accounting narrative obfuscation: an actor-network-theoretic analysis of a failing project.” Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 13(1), 86–89.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, H.-T., Wang, E. Y., & Zhou, B. (2015). How does readability influence investors’ judgments? Consistency of benchmark performance matters. The Accounting Review, 90(1), 371–393. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarca, A. (2004). International convergence of accounting practices: Choosing between IAS and US GAAP. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 15(1), 60–91.
   Google Scholar
• You, H., & X.-J. Zhang. (2009). Financial reporting complexity and investor underreaction to 10-K information. Review of Accounting Studies, 14(4), 559–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar