Acceptance of e-learning applications by accounting students in an online learning environment at residential universities

References

• Agyei, C., & Razi, Ö. (2021). The effect of extended UTAUT model on EFLs’ adaptation to flipped classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 1865–1882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10657-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ain, N. U., Kaur, K., & Waheed, M. (2016). The influence of learning value on learning management system use: An extension of UTAUT2. Information Development, 32(5), 1306–1321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666915597546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Emran, M., & Granić, A. (2021). Is it still valid or outdated? A bibliometric analysis of the technology acceptance model and its applications from 2010 to 2020. In M. Al-Emran & K. Shaalan (Eds.), Recent advances in technology acceptance models and theories (pp. 1–12). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64987-6_1
   Google Scholar
• Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2018). Technology acceptance model in M-learning context: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 125, 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfadda, H. A., & Mahdi, H. S. (2021). Measuring students’ use of Zoom application in language course based on the technology acceptance model (TAM). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50, 883–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09752-1 PMID:33398606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altalhi, M. (2021). Toward a model for acceptance of MOOCs in higher education: The modified UTAUT model for Saudi Arabia. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1589–1605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10317-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ameri, A., Khajouei, R., Ameri, A., & Jahani, Y. (2020). Acceptance of a mobile-based educational application (LabSafety) by pharmacy students: An application of the UTAUT2 model. Education and Information Technologies, 25(1), 419–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09965-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, V. (2020). A digital pedagogy pivot: Re-thinking higher education practice from an HRD perspective. Human Resource Development International, 23(4), 452–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2020.1778999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arain, A. A., Hussain, Z., Rizvi, W. H., & Vighio, M. S. (2019). Extending UTAUT2 toward acceptance of mobile learning in the context of higher education. Universal Access in the Information Society, 18(3), 659–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-019-00685-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attuquayefio, S. N., & Addo, H. (2014). Using the UTAUT model to analyse students’ ICT adoption. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 10(3), 75–86.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azizi, S. M., Roozbahani, N., & Khatony, A. (2020). Factors affecting the acceptance of blended learning in medical education: Application of UTAUT2 model. BMC Medical Education, 20, Article 367. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02302-2
   Google Scholar
• Baard, R. S., Steenkamp, L. P., Frick, B. L., & Kidd, M. (2010). Factors influencing success in first-year accounting at a South African university: The profile of a successful first-year accounting student. South African Journal of Accounting Research, 24(1), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/10291954.2010.11435150
   Google Scholar
• Bergdahl, N., Fors, U., Hernwall, P., & Knutsson, O. (2018). The use of learning technologies and student engagement in learning activities. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 13(2), 113–130. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943x-2018-02-04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, K. (2019). Business statistics: Contemporary decision making (10th ed.). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, M., Marín, V. I., Dolch, C., Bedenlier, S., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2018). Digital transformation in German higher education: Student and teacher perceptions and usage of digital media. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15, Article 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0130-1
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C. A., Danvers, K., & Doran, D. T. (2016). Student perceptions on using guided reading questions to motivate student reading in the flipped classroom. Accounting Education, 25(3), 256–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2016.1165124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2012). Business research methods (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Camilleri, M. A., & Camilleri, A. C. (2022). Learning from anywhere, anytime: Utilitarian motivations and facilitating conditions for mobile learning. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09608-8
   Google Scholar
• Carcavallo, A. S. (2020). Accountancy higher education: Evolution in digital technologies adoption. In P. Kommers, A. B. N. Viana, T. Issa, & Pedro Isaías (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Educational Technologies (pp. 122–124). São Paulo: IADIS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, B., Bastedo, K., & Howard, W. (2018). Exploring design elements for online STEM courses: Active learning, engagement & assessment design. Online Learning Journal, 22(2), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i2.1369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cranfield, D. J., Tick, A., Venter, I. M., Blignaut, R. J., & Renaud, K. (2021). Higher education students’ perceptions of online learning during COVID-19 – A comparative study. Education Sciences, 11(8), 403. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, C., Mason, D., Shelton, K., & Baur, K. (2015). Active learning strategies for online and blended learning environments. In J. Keengwe & J. J. Agamba (Eds.), Models for improving and optimizing online and blended learning in higher education (pp. 58–82). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6280-3.ch004
   Google Scholar
• Czerniewicz, L., Agherdien, N., Badenhorst, J., Belluigi, D., Chambers, T., Chili, M., De Villiers, M., Felix, A., Gachago, D., Gokhale, C., Ivala, E., Kramm, N., Madiba, M., Mistri, G., Mgqwashu, E., Pallitt, N., Prinsloo, P., Solomon, K., Strydom, S., … Wissing, G. (2020). A wake-up call: Equity, inequality and Covid-19 emergency remote teaching and learning. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 946–967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00187-4
   Google Scholar
• Dexter, S., Clement, D., Moraguez, D., & Watson, G. S. (2020). (Inter)Active learning tools and pedagogical strategies in educational leadership preparation. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 15(3), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942775120936299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Plessis, A., Müller, H., & Prinsloo, P. (2005). Determining the profile of the successful first-year accounting student. South African Journal of Higher Education, 19(4), 684–698.
   Google Scholar
• Faqih, K. M., & Jaradat, M. I. R. M. (2015). Assessing the moderating effect of gender differences and individualism-collectivism at individual-level on the adoption of mobile commerce technology: TAM3 perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 22, 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel, D. (2013). Inductive and deductive approaches to research. Accessed at https://deborahgabriel.com/2013/03/17/inductive-and-deductive-approaches-to-research/
   Google Scholar
• Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (1997). Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail: An extension to the technology acceptance model. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 21, 389–400. https://doi.org/10.2307/249720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, C. R., Woodfield, W., & Harrison, J. B. (2013). A framework for institutional adoption and implementation of blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granić, A., & Marangunić, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2572–2593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). SEM: Confirmatory factor analysis. In J. F. Hair, W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, R. E. Anderson, & R. L. Tatham (Eds.), Multivariate data analysis (pp. 770–842). London: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2017). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1567–1579. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946
   Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Hubona, G., & Ray, P. A. (2016). Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: Updated guidelines. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116, 2–20. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, Y., Al-Arabiat, M., & Shin, D. H. (2016). Understanding technology acceptance in a mandatory environment: A literature review. Information Development, 32(4), 1266–1283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666915593621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilie, V., Van Slyke, C., Green, G., & Lou, H. (2005). Gender differences in perceptions and use of communication technologies: A diffusion of innovation approach. Information Resources Management Journal, 18(3), 13–31. https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2005070102
   Google Scholar
• International Association of Universities. (2020). COVID-19: Higher Education challenges and responses. https://www.iau-aiu.net/COVID-19-Higher-Education-challenges-and-responses
   Google Scholar
• Kabilan, M. K., Ahmad, N., & Abidin, M. J. Z. (2010). Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education? The Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, A., Egbue, O., Palkie, B., & Madden, J. (2017). Active learning: Engaging students to maximize learning in an online course. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 15(2), 107–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khechine, H., Lakhal, S., Pascot, D., & Bytha, A. (2014). UTAUT model for blended learning: The role of gender and age in the intention to use webinars. Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Lifelong Learning, 10, 33–52.
   Google Scholar
• Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 101–111). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_9
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Convergence of structural equation modeling and multilevel modeling. In M. Williams & W. P. Vogt (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of innovation in social research methods (pp. 562–589). Sage., https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446268261.n31
   Google Scholar
• Krasodomska, J., & Godawska, J. (2021). E-learning in accounting education: The influence of students’ characteristics on their engagement and performance. Accounting Education, 30(1), 22–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2020.1867874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar Basak, S., Wotto, M., & Belanger, P. (2018). E-learning, M-learning and D-learning: Conceptual definition and comparative analysis. E-Learning and Digital Media, 15(4), 191–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753018785180
   Google Scholar
• Lakhal, S., Khechine, H., & Mukamurera, J. (2021). Explaining persistence in online courses in higher education: A difference-in-differences analysis. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, Article 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00251-4
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H., Park, N., & Hwang, Y. (2015). A new dimension of the digital divide: Exploring the relationship between broadband connection, smartphone use and communication competence. Telematics and Informatics, 32(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2014.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lento, C. (2016). Promoting active learning in introductory financial accounting through the flipped classroom design. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 8(1), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-01-2015-0005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leow, L. P., Phua, L. K., & Teh, S. Y. (2021). Extending the social influence factor: Behavioural intention to increase the usage of information and communication technology-enhanced student-centered teaching methods. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 1853–1879. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10017-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, J., Yu, C., & Liu, C. (2009). Mobile data service demographics in urban China. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 50(2), 117–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubbe, I., & Coetzee, S. (2018). Accounting education in Africa. Accounting Education, 27(5), 453–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2018.1514789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maatuk, A. M., Elberkawi, E. K., Aljawarneh, S., Rashaideh, H., & Alharbi, H. (2022). The COVID-19 pandemic and E-learning: Challenges and opportunities from the perspective of students and instructors. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 34(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-021-09274-2 PMID:33967563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maiorana, V. P. (1991). The road from rote to critical thinking. Communication Review, 11, 53–64.
   Google Scholar
• Marinoni, G., Van’t Land, H., & Jensen, T. (2020). The impact of Covid-19 on higher education around the world: IAU Global Survey Report. Paris: International Association of Universities.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research. Atlanta: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moorthy, K., Yee, T. T., T’ing, L. C., & Kumaran, V. V. (2019). Habit and hedonic motivation are the strongest influences in mobile learning behaviours among higher education students in Malaysia. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mtshali, N. (2020, August 8). How Covid-19 could change the higher education sector permanently. Independent Online. https://www.iol.co.za/news/opinion/how-covid-19-could-change-the-higher-education-sector-permanently-438ed3fc-617c-43ab-8fda-d962ee009266
   Google Scholar
• Müller, H., Prinsloo, P., & Du Plessis, A. (2007). Validating the profile of a successful first year accounting student. Meditari Accountancy Research, 15(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/10222529200700002
   Google Scholar
• Ng’ambi, D., Brown, C., Bozalek, V., Gachago, D., & Wood, D. (2016). Technology enhanced teaching and learning in South African higher education – A rearview of a 20 year journey. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 843–858. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolopoulou, K., Gialamas, V., & Lavidas, K. (2020). Acceptance of mobile phone by university students for their studies: An investigation applying UTAUT2 model. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 4139–4155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10157-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1978). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ohei, K. N., & Brink, R. (2020). The use of instructional ICT web technologies in higher education systems to support students’ academic success. Mousaion, 37(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-659X/5975
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, W., Hamari, J., Shi, L., Toda, A., Rodrigues, L., Palomino, P., & Isotani, S. (2022). Tailored gamification in education: A literature review and future agenda. Education and Information Technologies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11122-4
   Google Scholar
• Oye, N. D., Iahad, N. A., & Rahim, N. A. (2014). The history of UTAUT model and its impact on ICT acceptance and usage by academicians. Education and Information Technologies, 19(1), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-012-9189-9
   Google Scholar
• Pandey, J. (2019). Deductive approach to content analysis. In M. Gupta, M. Shaheen, & K. P. Reddy (Eds.), Qualitative techniques for workplace data analysis (pp. 145–169). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5366-3.ch007
   Google Scholar
• Papageorgiou, E. (2017). Accounting students’ profile versus academic performance: A five-year analysis. South African Journal of Higher Education, 31(3), 209–229. https://doi.org/10.20853/31-3-1064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papageorgiou, E. (2019). Lecture attendance versus academic performance and prior knowledge of accounting students: An exploratory study at a South African university. South African Journal of Higher Education, 33(1), 262–282. https://doi.org/10.20853/33-1-2695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papageorgiou, E., & Callaghan, C. W. (2018). Parental style and gendered student performance in the South African context of accounting studies. Accounting Education, 27(5), 456–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2017.1340167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papageorgiou, E., & Carpenter, R. (2019). Prior accounting knowledge of first-year students at two South African universities: Contributing factor to academic performance or not? South African Journal of Higher Education, 33(6), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.20853/33-6-3032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Raman, A., & Thannimalai, R. (2021). Factors impacting the behavioural intention to use e-learning at higher education amid the Covid-19 pandemic: UTAUT2 model. Psychological Science and Education, 26(3), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2021260305
   Google Scholar
• Ramírez-Correa, P., Rondán-Cataluña, F. J., Arenas-Gaitán, J., & Martín-Velicia, F. (2019). Analysing the acceptation of online games in mobile devices: An application of UTAUT2. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 50, 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.04.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riahi, G. (2015). E-learning systems based on cloud computing: A review. Procedia Computer Science, 62, 352–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.415
   Google Scholar
• Salloum, S. A., Alhamad, A. Q. M., Al-Emran, M., Monem, A. A., & Shaalan, K. (2019). Exploring students’ acceptance of e-learning through the development of a comprehensive technology acceptance model. IEEE Access: Practical Innovations, Open Solutions, 7, 128445–128462. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2939467
   Google Scholar
• Sava, R. (2016). Using interactive methods in teaching accounting. Studies in Business and Economics, 11(2), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1515/sbe-2016-0027
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, B. H., Hartwick, J., & Warshaw, P. R. (1988). The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. The Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), 325–343. https://doi.org/10.1086/209170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitar-Taut, D. A., & Mican, D. (2021). Mobile learning acceptance and use in higher education during social distancing circumstances: An expansion and customization of UTAUT2. Online Information Review, 45(5), 1000–1019. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-01-2021-0017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• South African Government. (2021). South Africa at a glance. https://www.gov.za/about-sa/south-africa-glance
   Google Scholar
• Steenkamp, L. P., Baard, R. S., & Frick, B. L. (2009). Factors influencing success in first-year accounting at a South African university: A comparison between lecturers’ assumptions and students’ perceptions. South African Journal of Accounting Research, 23(1), 113–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10291954.2009.11435142
   Google Scholar
• Sun, H., & Zhang, P. (2006). The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(2), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terblanche, W., Fakir, D., Chinyamurindi, W., & Mishi, S. (2021). Impact of self-esteem and student-and-lecturer interaction on academic performance in a chartered accounting programme. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(4), 464–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1781801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Universities South Africa. (2021). Public universities in South Africa. https://www.usaf.ac.za/public-universities-in-south-africa/
   Google Scholar
• Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 271–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60019-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. G. (2000). Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 24, 115–139. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonderwell, S., & Turner, S. (2005). Active learning and preservice teachers’ experiences in an online course: A case study. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(1), 65–84.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. H. (2020). Design-based research on integrating learning technology tools into higher education classes to achieve active learning. Computers & Education, 156, 103935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weston, R., & Gore, P. A., Jr. (2006). A brief guide to structural equation modeling. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(5), 719–751. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006286345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitton, N., & Langan, M. (2019). Fun and games in higher education: An analysis of UK student perspectives. Teaching in Higher Education: Critical Perspectives, 24(8), 1000–1013. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1541885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, S. (2013). Understanding undergraduate students’ adoption of mobile learning model: A perspective of the extended UTAUT2. Journal of Convergence Information Technology, 8(10), 969–979. https://doi.org/10.4156/jcit.vol8.issue10.118
   Google Scholar