Inter-relationships between the January effect, market capitalisation and value investment strategies on the JSE

REFERENCES

• Asness CS, Liew JM and Stevens RL. 1997. Parallels between the cross-sectional predictability of stock and country returns. Journal of Portfolio Management, Spring:79–87.
   Google Scholar
• Banz RW. 1981. The relationship between return and market value of common stocks. Journal of Financial Economics, 9:3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber BM and Lyon JD. 1996. Firm size, book-to-market and security returns: a holdout sample of financial firms. Journal of Finance, 51:85–102.
   Google Scholar
• Barret BEA. 1996. An Analysis of the Market Capitalisation Effect on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. Unpublished MBA Research Report. Johannesburg; University of the Witwatersrand.
   Google Scholar
• Basu S. 1997. The investment performance of common stocks in relation to their price-earnings ratios: a test of the efficient market hypothesis. Journal of Finance, 32(3), June: 663–681.
   Google Scholar
• Berges A, McConnell JJ and Schlarbaum G. 1984. The turn-of-the year in Canada. Journal of Finance, 39(1):185–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhana N. 1992. An empirical relationship between company growth and the market price of securities listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. South African Journal of Business Management, 23(3/4):63–68.
   Google Scholar
• Black F. 1972. Capital market equilibrium with restricted borrowing. Journal of Business, 45:444–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black F. 1993. Beta and return. Journal of Portfolio Management, 20:8–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blume ME and Stambaugh RF. 1983. Biases in computed returns—an application to the size effect. Journal of Financial Economics, 12:387–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradfield DJ. 1990. A note on the seasonality of stock returns on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. South African Journal of Business Management, 21(1):7–9.
   Google Scholar
• Brown PB, Keim CD, Kleidon AW and Marsh TA. 1983. Stock return seasonalities and the tax-loss selling hypothesis: analysis of the arguments and Australian evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 12:105–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capaul C, Rowley I and Sharpe WF. 1983. International value and growth stock returns. Financial Analysts Journal, Fall: 212–223.
   Google Scholar
• Chan LKC, Hamao Y and Lakonishok J. 1991. Fundamentals and stock returns in Japan. Journal of Finance, 46(5), December: 1739–1764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopherson JA. 1995. Equity style classification. Journal of Portfolio Management, Spring: 32–43.
   Google Scholar
• Cook TJ and Rozeff M. (1984). Size and earnings/price ration anomalies: one effect or two? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 19(4), December:449–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corhay A, Hawawini G and Michel P. 1987. Seasonality in the risk-return relationship: some international evidence. Journal of Finance, 42(1):49–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel K and Titman S. 1997. Evidence of the characteristics of cross sectional variation in stock returns. Journal of Finance, 52(1), March:1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis JL. 1994. The cross-section of realised stock returns: the pre-COMPUSTAT evidence. Journal of Finance, 49(5):1579–1593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson S and Meyer S. 1993. The Monday effect and the Johannesburg Exchange: revisited. South African Journal of Business Management, 24(3):83–87.
   Google Scholar
• De Bondt WFM and Thaler RH. 1985. Does the stock market overreact? Journal of Finance, 40(3), July:793–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Villiers P, Lowings T, Pettit T and Affleck-Graves J. 1986. An investigation into the small firm effect on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. South African Journal of Business Management, 17(4):191–195.
   Google Scholar
• Fama EF. 1970. Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25:383–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama EF. 1991. Efficient capital markets II. Journal of Finance, 44(5), December: 1575–1671.
   Google Scholar
• Fama EF and French KR. 1992. The cross section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance, 47(2), June:427–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama EF and French KR. 1993. Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1), February: 3–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller RJ, Huberts LC and Levinson MJ. 1992. It's not higgledy-piggledy growth. Journal of Portfolio Management, Winter:38–45.
   Google Scholar
• Gates SR. 1997. The Market-to-Book Effect on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. Unpublished MBA Research Report. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbertson PB and Roux FJP. 1977. The Johannesburg Stock Exchange as an efficient market. Investment Analysts Journal, 9:21–27.
   Google Scholar
• Gultekin MN and Gultekin NB. 1983. Stock market seasonality: international evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 12:469–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves K. 1997. The relationship between Market Capitalisation and Risk on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange: 1991–1995. Unpublished MBA Research Report. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand.
   Google Scholar
• Haugen RA. 1995. The new finance: the case against efficient markets. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Ibbotson RG, Kaplan PD and Peterson JD. 1997. Estimates of small-stock betas are much to low. Journal of Portfolio Management, Summer: 104–110.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs Bl and Levy KN. 1988. Disentangling equity return regularities: new insights and investment opportunities. Financial Analysts Journal, May/June.
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe J, Keim DB and Westerfeld R. 1989. Earnings yields, market values and stock returns. Journal of Finance, 44(1), March:135–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman D and Tversky A. 1973. On the psychology of prediction. Psychology Review, 80:2251–273.
   Google Scholar
• Keim DB. 1983. Size-related anomalies and share return seasonality: further empirical evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 12:13–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knez PJ and Ready MJ. 1996. On the robustness of size and book-to-market in cross sectional regressions. Journal of Finance, 51:345–387.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, RF and Affleck-Graves JF. 1985 An empirical evaluation of the effectiveness of South African investment analysts. South African Journal of Business Management, 16:157–160.
   Google Scholar
• Kothari SP, Shanken J and Sloan RG. 1995. Another look at the cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance, 50(1), March:185–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakonishok J, Schleifer A and Vishny RW. 1994. Contrarian investment, extrapolation and risk. Journal of Finance, 49(5):1541–1578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linter J. 1965. The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Review of Economics and Statistics, 47:13–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markowitz HM. 1959. Portfolio Selection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Page MJ and Palmer F. 1991. The relationship between excess returns, firm size and earnings on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. South African Journal of Business Management, 22(3): 63–73.
   Google Scholar
• Page MJ and Way CV. 1993. Stock market over-reaction: the South African evidence. Investment Analysts Journal, Summer:35–47.
   Google Scholar
• Philpot MF and Firer C. 1995. Share price anomalies and the efficiency of the JSE. Investment Analysts Journal, 40, Summer, 39–51.
   Google Scholar
• Plaistowe T and Knight RF. 1986. Premium to book value may be a contrary indicator. The Investment Analysts Journal, 28, November:35–39.
   Google Scholar
• Reinganum MR. 1981. Misspecification of capital asset pricing: empirical anomalies based on earnings' yield and market values. Journal of Financial Economics, 9:19–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roll R and Ross SA. 1994. On the cross-sectional relationship between expected returns and betas. Journal of Finance, 49(1):101–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg B, Reid K and Lanstein R. 1985. Persuasive evidence of market inefficiency. Journal of Portfolio Management, 11, Spring:9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Rozeff MS and Kinney R. 1976. Capital market seasonality: the case of stock returns, Journal of Financial Economics, 3:379–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz P. 1983. Transaction costs and the small firm effect—a comment. Journal of Financial Economics, 12:81–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpe WF. 1964. Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Finance, 19:425–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpe WF. 1992. Asset allocation: management style and performance measurement. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 18(2), Winter:7–19.
   Google Scholar
• Sinquefield RA. 1996. Where are the gains from international diversification?. Financial Analysts Journal, January-February:8–14.
   Google Scholar
• Statman M. 1988. Investor Psychology and Market Inefficiencies, in Equity Markets and Valuation Methods, Sherrerd KF (Editor). Charlottesville: Institution of Chartered Financial Analysts.
   Google Scholar
• Strebel PJ. (1987). The limited efficiency of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. Investment Analysts Journal, 10:15–20.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson AR and Ward MJD. 1995. The Johannesburg Stock Exchange as an efficient market: a review. Journal for Studies in Economics t and Econometrics, 19(3):33–36.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Bergh WM and Wessels RE. 1985. Stock market seasonality and taxes: an examination of the tax-loss selling hypothesis. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting (UK). 12(4):515–530.
   Google Scholar
• Vos HP. 1990. Seasonality in the Risk-Return Relationship. Unpublished MBA Research Report. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand.
   Google Scholar
• Waelkens KG. 1995. The Low Price Effect on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange: A Study 1983–1993. Unpublished MBA Research Report. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand.
   Google Scholar
• Waelkens KG and Ward M. 1997. The low price effect on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. Investment Analysts Journal, 45:35–48.
   Google Scholar