A decomposition of style-based risk on the JSE

REFERENCES

• Asness CS. 1997. The interaction of value and momentum strategies. Financial Analysts Journal, March/April:29–36.
   Google Scholar
• Ball R. 1978. Anomalies in relationships between securities' yields and yield surrogates. Journal of Financial Economics, 6(2):103–126.
   Google Scholar
• Banz RW. 1981. The relationship between return and the market value of common stock. Journal of Financial Economics, 9(1):3–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banz RW and Breen WJ. 1986. Sample dependent results using accounting and market data: some evidence. Journal of Finance, 41(4):779–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu S. 1977. The investment performance of common stocks in relation to their price-earnings ratios: a test of the efficient market hypothesis. Journal of Finance, 32(3):663–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu S. 1983. The relationsip between earnings yield market value and return for NYSE common stocks: further evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 12(1): 129–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandari LC. 1988. Debt-equity ratio and expected common stock returns. Journal of Finance, 43(2):507–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black F. 1972. Capital market equilibrium with restricted borrowing. Journal of Business, 45(3):444–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black F. 1993. Beta and return. Journal of Portfolio Management, 20:8–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradfield DJ, Barr GDI and Affleck-Graves JF. 1988. Asset pricing in small markets—the South African case. South African Journal of Business Management, 19(1): 11–21.
   Google Scholar
• Breeden DT. 1979. An intertemporal asset pricing model with stochastic consumption and investment opportunities. Journal of Financial Economics, 7(3):265–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan LKC, Jegadeesh N and Lakonishok J. 1995. Evaluating the performance of value versus glamour stocks: the impact of selection bias. Journal of Financial Economics, 38:269–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook TJ and Rozeff MS 1984. Size and earnings/price ratio anomalies: one effect or two? Journal of Financial and Quantative Analysis, 19(4):449–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel K and Titman S 1997. Evidence on the characteristics of cross sectional variation in stock returns. Journal of Finance, 52(1): 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis JL. (1994). The cross section of realised stock returns: the pre-COMPUSTAT evidence. Journal of Finance, 49(5):1579–1593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bondt WFM and Thaler R. 1985. Does the stock market overreact? Journal of Finance, 40(3):793–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bondt WFM and Thaler R. 1985. Futher evidence on investor overreaction and stock market seasonality. Journal of Finance, 42(3):557–581.
   Google Scholar
• De Villiers JP, Lowlings AJ Pettit and Affleck-Graves JF. 1986. An investigation into the small firm effect on the JSE. South African Journal of Business Management, 17(4): 191–195.
   Google Scholar
• Fama EF. 1991. Efficient capital markets: II. Journal of Finance, 46(5):1575–1617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama EF. 1997. Multifactor portfolio efficiency and multifactor asset pricing. Journal of Financial and Quantative Analysis, 31 (4):441–465.
   Google Scholar
• Fama EF and French KR. 1988. Dividend yields and expected stock returns Journal of Financial Economics, 22:3–25.
   Google Scholar
• Fama EF and French KR. 1989. Business conditions and the expected returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 25(1):23–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama EF and French KR. 1992. The cross section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance, 46:427–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama EF and French KR. 1993. Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33:3–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama EF and French KR. 1995. Size and book-to- market factors in earnings and returns. Journal of Finance, 50(1):131–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama EF and French KR. 1996a. Multifactor explanations of asset pricing anomalies. Journal of Finance, 51(1):55–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama EF and French KR. 1996b. The CAPM is wanted, dead or alive. Journal of Finance, 51(5): 1947–1958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama EF and Miller MH. 1972. The Theory of Finance. Dryden Press, Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Ferson WE and Harvey CR. 1991. The variation of economic risk premiums. Journal of Political Economy, 99:385–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firer C and Sandler M. 1994. Finance Research in South Africa. Paper presented at the SAFA Congress, January, Johannesburg.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser E and Page MJ. 1999. Value and momentum strategies: evidence from the JSE. Unpublished paper presented at the annual SAFA Conference, Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon MJ and Shapiro E. 1956. Capital equipment analysis: the required rate of profit. Management Science, October:53–61.
   Google Scholar
• Graham B and Dodd D. 1934. Security Analysis. McGraw Hill, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Haugen RA. 1995. The New Finance: The Case Against Efficient Markets. Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Heck JL and Cooley PL. 1988. Most frequent contributors to the finance literature. Financial Management, 17(3):100–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe J, Keim DB and Westerfield R. 1989. Earnings yields, market values, and stock returns. Journal of Finance, 44(1):135–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jegadeesh N and Titman S. 1993. Returns to buying winners and selling losers: implications for stock market efficiency. Journal of Finance, 48:65–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman D and Tversky A. 1982. Intuitive predictions: biases and corrective procedures. Reprinted in Kahneman D, Slovic A and Tversky A, Judgement Under Uncertainty: Heuristic and Biases, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Keim DB. 1983. Size related anomalies and stock return seasonality: further empirical evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 12 (1): 13–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kothari SP, Shanken J and Sloan RG. 1995. Another look at the cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance, 50(1): 185–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakonishok J, Shleifer A and Vishny RW. 1994. Contrarian investment, extrapolation, and risk. Journal of Finance, 49(5):1541–1578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Porta R. 1996. Expectations and the cross-section of stock returns. Journal of Finance, 51:1715–1742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo AW and Mackinlay AC. 1988. Stock markets do not follow random walks: evidence from a simple specification test. Review of Financial Studies, 1 (1):41–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinlay AC. 1995. Multifactor models do not explain deviations from the CAPM. Journal of Financial Economics, 38:3–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mossin J. 1966. Equilibrium in a capital asset market. Econometrica, 34(4):768–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page MJ. 1996. Further evidence of firm size and earnings anomalies on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. De Ratione, 10(1):27–44.
   Google Scholar
• Page MJ and Palmer F. 1993. The relationship between excess returns, firm size and earnings on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. South African Journal of Business Management, 22(3):63–73.
   Google Scholar
• Plaistowe T and Knight RF. 1986. Premium to book value may be a contrary indicator. Investment Analysts Journal, 21:35–39.
   Google Scholar
• Reinganum MR. 1981a. Abnormal returns in small firm portfolios. Financial Analysts Journal, 37(2):52–56.
   Google Scholar
• Reinganum MR. 1981b. Misspecifications of capital asset pricing: empirical anomalies based on earnings yields and market values. Journal of Financial Economics, 9(1):19–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinganum MR. 1983. The anomalous stock market behaviour of small firms in January: empirical tests for tax loss selling effects. Journal of Financial Economics, 12(1):89–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson M and Van Rensburg P. 2001. Characteristic variables and the cross-section of JSE returns. Unpublished working paper, University of Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Roll R. 1977. A critique of the asset pricing theory's tests. Journal of Financial Economics, 4(2): 129–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roll R. 1978. Ambiguity when performance is measured by the securities line. Journal of Finance, 33(4):1051–1069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roll R. 1983. Vas ist das? The turn of year effect and the return premia and the return premia of small firms. Journal of Portfolio Management, 9:1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Ross S A (1976), “The Arbitrage Theory of Capital Asset Pricing”, Journal of Economic Theory, 13(3):341–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg B, Reid K and Lanstein R. 1985. Persuasive evidence of market inefficiency. Journal of Portfolio Management. Journal of Portfolio Management, 11(3):9–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpe WF. 1964. Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Finance, 19(3):425–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Rensburg P. 1998. Unifying the factor analytic and prespecified variable approaches to APT factor identification on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. The South African Journal of Accounting Research, 12(1):15–45.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rensburg P. 1999. Explaining asset pricing ‘anomalies’, Paper presented at the Asia-Pacific Finance Congress, Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rensburg P. 2000. Macroeconomic variables and the cross-section of Johannesburg Stock Exchange returns, The South African Journal of Business Management, 31 (1):31–43.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rensburg P and Fouche SE. 1997. A survey of South African unit trust portfolio managers. Investment Analysts Journal, 1998, 47:23–31.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rensburg P and Slaney KBE. 1997. Market segmentation on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. Journal for Studies in Economics and Econometrics, 23(3):1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rensburg P and Zhu J. 2000. Market segmentation on the JSE II. Unpublished working paper, University of Cape Town and University of Natal, Durban.
   Google Scholar
• Ward M and Hargreaves K. 1998. The relationship between market capitalisation, risk and return on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. Paper presented at the SAFA Congress, Cape Town, South Africa.
   Google Scholar