The shareholder-wealth effects of information technology infrastructure investments in South Africa

REFERENCES

• Attewell P. 1992. Technology diffusion and organisational learning: The case of business computing. Organization Science, 3(1):1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barney J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17(1):99–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barua A, Kriebel CH and Mukhopadhyay T. 1995. Information technologies and business value: An analytic and empiricai investigation Information Systems Research, 6(1):3–23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhana N. 2001. The valuation effects of research and development spending announcements by companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. The Investment Analysts Journal, 53:29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Bhana N 2003. The share price reaction to announcements of Key executive dismissals by companies listed on the JSE Securities Exchange. The Investment Analysis Journal. 58:29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj AS. 2000. A resource-Based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24(1):169–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya U, Daouk H, Jorgenson B and Kehr C. 2000. When an event is not an event: the curious case of an emerging market. Journal of Financial Economics, 55: 69–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowie DC and Bradfield DJ. 1998. Robust estimations of beta coefficients: Evidence from a small stock market. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 25(3/4):439–454.
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent M and Weill P. 1997. Management by maxim: How business and IT managers can create IT infrastructures. MIT Sloan Management Review, Spring, 38(3): 77–92.
   Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E and Hitt LM. 1996. Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Science, 42(4):541–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E and Hitt LM. 1998. Beyond the productivity paradox. Communications of the ACM, 41(8): 49–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Malone TW, Gurbaxani V and Kambil A. 1994. Does information technology lead to smaller firms? Management Science, 40(12): 1628–1644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell CJ and Wasley CE. 1993. Measuring security performance using daily NASDAQ returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 33(1):73–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr NG. 2003. IT Doesn't Matter. Harvard Business Review, 81 (5):41–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee D, Pacini C and Sambamurthy V. 2002. The shareholder-wealth and trading-volume effects of information-technology infrastructure investments Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(2):7–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrado CA. 1989. A non-parametric test for abnormal security-price performance in event studies. Journal of Financial Economics, 23(2):385–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrado CJ and Zivney TL. 1992. The specification and power of the sign test in event study hypothesis tests using daily stock returns. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27(3):465–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan AR. 1992. Nonparametric event study tests. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 2. 343–358
   Google Scholar
• Dedrick J, Gurbaxani V and Kraemer KL. 2003. Information technology and economic performance: A critical review of the empirical evidence. ACM Computing Surveys, 35(1): 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewan S and Kraemer KL. 2000. Information technology and productivity: Preliminary evidence from country-level data. Management Science, 46(4):548–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dos Santos BL, Peffers K and Mauer DC. 1993. The impact of information technology investment announcements on the market value of the firm. Information Systems Research, 4(1):1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan NB. 1995. Capturing flexibility of information technology infrastructure: A study of resource characteristics and their measure. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(7):37–57.
   Google Scholar
• Fama EF. 1991. Efficient capital markets: II. The Journal of Finance, 46(5): 1575–1617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francalanci C and Galal H. 1998. Information technology and worker composition: Determinants of productivity in the life insurance industry. MIS Quarterly, 22(2):227–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove H, Selto FH and Hanbery G. 1990. The Effect of information system intangibles on the market value of the firm. Journal of Information Systems, Fall, 4(3):36–47.
   Google Scholar
• Im KS, Dow KE and Graver V. 2001. Research report: A re-examination of IT investment and the market value of the firm—An event study methodology. Information Systems Research, 12(1): 103–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpoff JM. 1986. A theory of trading volume. The Journal of Finance, 41 (5): 1069–1087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayworth TR, Chatterjee D and Sambamurthy V. 2001. Theoretical justification for IT infrastructure investments. Information Resources Management Journal, 14(3):5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Kim O and Verrecchia RE. 1991. Trading volume and price reactions to public announcements. Journal of Accounting Research, 29(2):302–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobo GJ and Tung S. 1997. Relationship between pre- disclosure information asymmetry and trading volume reaction around quarterly earnings announcements. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 24(6):851–867.
   Google Scholar
• Lubbe S, Parker G and Hoard A. 1995. The profit impact of IT investment. Journal of Information Technology, 10:44–51.
   Google Scholar
• Mata FJ, Fuerst WL and Barney JB. 1995. Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource based analysis. MIS Quarterly, 19(4):487–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McWilliams A and Siegel D. 1997. Event studies in management research: Theoretical and empirical issues. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3):626–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McWilliams TP and McWilliams VB. 2000. Another look at theoretical and empirical issues in event study methodology. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 16(3): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell VL and Zmud RW. 1999. The effects of coupling IT and work process strategies in redesign projects. Organization Science, 10(4):424–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okeahalam CC and Jefferis KR. 1999. An event study of the Botswana, Zimbabwe and Johannesburg Stock Exchanges. South African Journal of Business Management, 30(4):131–140.
   Google Scholar
• Patell JM. 1976. Corporate forecasts of earnings per share and stock price behaviour: Empirical tests. Journal of Accounting Research, 14(2):246–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roach SS. 1987. America's technology dilemma: A profile of the information economy. Morgan Stanley Special Economic Study, April.
   Google Scholar
• Solow R. 1987. We'd better watch out. New York Times Book Review, July 12.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan X, Kekre S and Mukhopadhyay T. 1994. Impact of electronic data interchange technology on JIT shipments. Management Science, 40(10):1291–1304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thatcher ME and Oliver JR. 2001. The impact of technology investments on a firm's production efficiency, product quality, and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(2):17–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tkac PA. 1999. A trading volume benchmark: Theory and evidence. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 34(1):89–114.
   Google Scholar
• Weill P. 1992. The relationship between investment in information technology and firm performance: a study of the valve manufacturing sector. Information Systems Research, 3(4):307–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weill P, Subramani M and Broadbent M. 2002. Building IT infrastructure for strategic agility. MIT Sloan Management Review, Fall, 44(1):57–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar