REFERENCES
- ARA, Inc., ERES Consultants Division, 2004. Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures. Champaign, IL: National Cooperative Highway Research Program.
- Breakah, T.M., Williams, R.C., Herzmann, D.E., and Takle, E.S., 2011. Effects of using accurate climate conditions for mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide. Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, 137 (1), 84–90.
- Coree, B., Ceylan, H., and Harrington, D., 2005. Implementing the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide: implementation plan. In: Center for Transportation Research and Education, Iowa Highway Research Board, CTRE Project 03-166.
- DOW Chemical Canada-Building Solutions, n.d. Calculating insulation needs to fight frost heave by comparing freezing index and frost depth. In: Tech Solutions 605.0. Available from: http://msdssearch.dow.com/PublishedLiteratureDOWCOM/dh_01f6/0901b803801f6296.pdf?filepath=styrofoam/pdfs/noreg/178-00754.pdf&fromPage=GetDoc [Accessed 7 December 2012].
- Departments of the Army and the Air Force, 1988. Arctic and subarctic construction: calculation method for the determination of depths of freeze and thaw in soils. Engineering Manual for Military Construction, Part XV.
- Johanneck, L. and Khazanovich, L., 2010. A comprehensive evaluation of the effect of climate in MEPDG prediction, transportation research board of the national academies. Transportation Research Board, 2170, 45–55.
- Qiang, L., Wang, K.C., and Hall, K., 2010. Verification of virtual climatic data in MEPDG using the LTPP database. Internation Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 3 (1), 10–15.
- Saha, J., Nassiri, S., Soleymani, H., and Bayat, A., 2012. A comparative study between Alberta transportation flexible pavement design and MEPDG. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 5 (6), 379–385.
- Xiao, D., Wang, K., and Hall, K., 2010. Matching distress definitions in field and in MEPDG. University of Arkansas. Conference on Pavement Evaluation 2010. Roanoke, Va.