International roughness index models for HMA overlay treatment of flexible and composite pavements

References

• Abaza, K.A., 2005. Performance-based models for flexible pavement structural overlay design. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 131 (2), 149–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguiar-Moya, J., Prozzi, J., and Smit, A.D.F., 2011. Mechanistic-empirical IRI model accounting for potential bias. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 137 (5), 297–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahammed, M.A. and Tighe, S.L., 2008. Statistical modeling in pavement management: do the models make sense?Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2084, 3–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ARA, Inc., ERES Division, 2001. Guide for mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabiltated pavement structures. Chapter 4: design of new and reconstruction rigid pavements. Champaign, IL: National Cooperative Highway Research Program.
   Google Scholar
• Azpuru, M. and Ramos, K.D., 2010. A comparison of spatial interpolation methods for estimation of average electromagnic field magnitude. Progress in Electromagnetics Research M, 14, 135–145.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchini, A. and Bandini, P., 2010. Prediction of pavement performance through Neuro-Fuzzy reasoning. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 25 (1), 39–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, J.-R., Chen, D.-H., and Hung, C.-T., 2005. Selecting preventive maintenance treatments in Texas: using the technique for order preference by similarity to the ideal solution for specific pavement study-3 sites. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1933, 62–71.
   Google Scholar
• George, K.P., 2000. MDOT pavement management system: prediction models and feedback system. Jackson, MS: Mississippi Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T.D., 1993. Effects of heavy-vehicle characteristics on pavement response and performnce. Washington, DC: National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Res. Rep. No. 353, Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Haider, S.W. and Dwaikat, M.B., 2011. Estimating optimum timing for preventive maintenance treatments to mitigate pavement roughness. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2235, 43–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hein, D. and Watt, D., 2005. Municipal pavement performance prediction based on pavement condition data. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Transportation Association of Canada, Calgary, Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y.H., 2004. Pavement analysis and design. 2nd ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Irfan, M., et al., 2009. Evaluating the cost effectiveness of flexible rehabilitation treatments using different performance criteria. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 135 (10), 753–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, N. and Puccinelli, J., 2006. Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) data analysis support: National Pooled Fund Study Tpf-5(013). McLean, VA: Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Kargah-Ostadi, N., Stoffels, S.M., and Tabatabaee, N., 2010. Network-Level pavement roughness prediction model for rehabilitation recommendations. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2155, 124–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khattak, M.J. and Baladi, G.Y., 2013. Development of cost-effective pavement treatment selection and treatment performance models. a final report (draft) 10-4P, submitted to LTRC. Baton Rogue, LA: Louisiana Transportation Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Khattak, M.J., Baladi, G.Y., and Sun, X., 2009. Development of index based pavement performance models for pavement management system (PMS) of LADOTD. Baton Rogue, LA: Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Khattak, M.J., et al., 2008. A review of the pavement management system of the state of Louisiana – phase I. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2084, 18–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khattak, M.J., et al., 2012. Rigid and composite pavement index-based performance models for network pavement management system in the state of Louisiana. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 1–17, 10.1080/10298436.2012.715643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, P. and Tolliver, D., 2012. Pavement pre- and post-treatment performance models using LTPP data. Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, 51 (3), 67–81.
   Google Scholar
• Ozbay, K. and Laub, R., 2001. Models for pavement deterioration using LTPP. Washington, DC: New Jersey Department of Transportation, Division of Research and Technology and U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Perera, R., Byrum, C., and Kohn, S., 1998. Investigation of developement of pavement roughness. McLean, VA: FHWA.
   Google Scholar
• Perera, R. and Kohn, S., 2001. LTPP data analysis: factors affecting pavement smoothness. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Cooperative Highway Research Program Project 20-50 (8/13).
   Google Scholar
• Peshkin, D., Hoerner, T., and Zimmerman, K., 2004. Optimal timing of pavement preventive maintenance treatment applications. Washington DC: Transportation Research Board, National Cooperative Research Program.
   Google Scholar
• Prozzi, J. and Madanat, S., 2004. Development of pavement performance models by combining experimental and field data. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 10 (1), 9–22.
   Google Scholar
• Rahim, A., et al., 2009. Evaluation of international roughness index for asphalt overlays placed over cracked and seated concrete pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 10 (3), 201–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirazi, H., et al., 2010. Confidence level and efficient sampling size of roughness measurements for pavement management in Maryland. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2153, 114–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titus-Glover, L. and Darter, M.I., 2008. Guidelines for improving full-depth repair of PCC pavements in Wisconsin. Champaign, IL: Applied Research Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, K.C.P. and Li, Q., 2011. Pavement smoothness prediction based on Fuzzy and Gray theories. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 26 (1), 69–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, G., Wang, L., and Lu, Y, 2008. IRI model enhacement for flexible pavement design using LTPP data. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, K.A. and Peshkin, D.G., 2003. Pavement management perspective on integrating preventive maintenance into a pavement management system. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1827, 3–9.
   Google Scholar