Structural contribution of open-graded friction course mixes in mechanistic–empirical pavement design

REFERENCES

• AASHTO, 1993. AASHTO guide for design of pavement structures. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO, 2009. AASHTO PP 61-09 standard practice for developing dynamic modulus master curves for hot mix asphalt (HMA) using the asphalt mixture performance tester (AMPT). Washington, DC: AASHTO.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Qadi, I.L., Xie, W., and Elseifi, M.A., 2008. Frequency determination from vehicular loading time pulse to predict appropriate complex modulus in MEPDG. The Journal of the Association of Asphalt Pavement Technologists, 77, 739–772.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez, A.E., et al., 2006. Synthesis of current practice on the design, construction, and maintenance of porous friction courses. College Station, TX: Texas Transportation Institute – Texas A&M University, Report No. FHWA/TX-06/0-5262-1.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez, A.E., et al., 2010. Evaluation of durability tests for permeable friction course mixtures. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 11 (1), 49–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Applied Research Associates, Inc. (ARA), 2004. ERES consultants division. Guide for mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, National Cooperative Highway Research Program.
   Google Scholar
• Cooley, L.A., et al., 2009. Construction and maintenance practices for permeable friction courses. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Cooperative Highway, Research Program Report 640.
   Google Scholar
• FHWA (Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation), 2008. Long-term pavement performance standard data release 22.0. Washington, DC: FHWA.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, D.I., Donavon, P., and James, R., 2005. Tire/pavement noise characteristics of HMA pavements. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists., 74, 1005–1039.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y.H., 2003. Kenlayer, accompanying software with pavement analysis and design. 2nd ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, G., 2002. Performance survey on open-graded friction course mixes. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Synthesis of Highway Practice 284.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, K-D., et al., 2011. Investigation of rutting potential of open graded friction course (OGFC) mixes using asphalt pavement analyzer. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 15 (7), 1259–1262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandhal, P., 2002. Design, construction, and maintenance of open-graded asphalt friction courses. Lanham, MD: National Asphalt Pavement Association, Information series 115.
   Google Scholar
• Kandhal, P., 2004. Asphalt pavements mitigate tire/pavement noise. Hot Mix Asphalt Technology, March–April (2004), 22–31.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.R., Momen, M., and King, M., 2005. Typical dynamic moduli for North Carolina asphalt concrete mixtures. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University, Final Report FWHA/NC, 2005-03.
   Google Scholar
• Lukanen, E.O., Stubstad, R., and Briggs, R., 2000. Temperature predictions and adjustment factors for asphalt pavement. Washington, DC: FHWA, Federal Highway Administration Publication No. FHWA-RD-98-085.
   Google Scholar
• Minhoto, M.J.C., et al., 2005. Predicting asphalt pavement temperature with a three-dimensional finite element method. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1919, 96–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ongel, A. and Harvey, J., 2004. Analysis of 30 years of pavement temperatures using the enhanced integrated climate model (EICM). Davis, CA: Pavement Research Centre, University of California Davis.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, M.M., 2009. An investigation into dynamic modulus of hot-mix asphalt and its contributing factors, Master thesis, Auburn University.
   Google Scholar
• Rogge, D. and Hunt, E.A., 1999. Development of maintenance practices for Oregon F-Mix. Salem, OR: Oregon Department of Transportation, Interim Report SPR371.
   Google Scholar
• Roque, R., et al., 2009. Introduction of fracture resistance to the design and evaluation of open graded friction courses in Florida. Gainesville, FL: Florida Department of Transportation, University of Florida, Final Report.
   Google Scholar
• Skok, E., Johnson, E., and Turk, A., 2003. Asphalt pavement analyzer (APA) evaluation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Report No. MN/RC 2003-02.
   Google Scholar
• Suresha, S.N., Varghese, G., and Udaya Ravi Shankar, A., 2010. Laboratory and theoretical evaluation of clogging behaviour of porous friction course mixes. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 11 (1), 61–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tappeiner, W., 1993. Open-graded asphalt friction course. Lanham, MD: National Asphalt Pavement Association, Information series 115.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Federal Highway Administration, 2005. Quiet pavement systems in Europe. FHWA International Technology Exchange Program. Available from: http://www.international.fhwa.dot.gov/pubs/quiet_pav/index.cfm [Accessed 13 June 2013].
   Google Scholar