528
Views
31
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Verification of effectiveness of chip seal as a pavement preventive maintenance treatment using LTPP data

&
Pages 879-888 | Received 24 Jan 2013, Accepted 19 Jan 2014, Published online: 06 Mar 2014

References

  • Collucci Rios, B. and Sinha, K.C., 1985. Optimal pavement management approach using roughness measurements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1048, 14–22.
  • Dawson, T.A., et al., 2011. Selection of optimum pavement treatment type and timing at the project level. In: TRB 90th annual meeting compendium of papers DVD [CD-ROM]Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
  • Gransberg, D. and James, D.M.B., 2005. Chip seal best practices, a synthesis of highway practice. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, Publication NCHRP Synthesis 342.
  • Haider, S.W. and Dwaikat, M.B., 2011. Estimating optimum timing for preventive maintenance treatments to mitigate pavement roughness. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2235, 43–53.
  • Hajj, E.Y., et al., 2011. Optimum time for application of slurry seal to asphalt concrete pavements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2235, 66–81.
  • Kuennen, T., 2003. When prevention is the cure – pavement preservation compendium II. U.S. Department of Transportation, FHWA: Pavements, June 2003. Available from: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/preservation.ppc0627.cfm [Accessed 11 March 2012].
  • Labi, S. and Sinha, K.C., 2003. The effectiveness of maintenance and its impact on capital expenditures. Technical Report.West Lafayette: Indiana Department of Transportation and Purdue University.
  • Li, Z. and Sinha, K.C., 2000. A methodology to determine the load and non-load shares of pavement repair expenditure. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University, Publication FHWA/JTRP-00-9.
  • Loria, L.G., et al., 2012. Effective timing of double slurry seal applications on asphalt pavement performance. Presented at 91st annual meeting of the Transporation Research Board, Washington, DC.
  • Mamlouk, M.S. and Zaniewski, J.P., 2001. Optimizing pavementent preservation: an urgent demand for every highway agency. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2 (2), 135–148.
  • Morian, D.A., 2011. Cost benefit analysis of thin surface treatments in pavement treatment strategies & cycle maintenance. FHWA, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Harrisburg, PA: Publication FHWA-PA-2011-001-080503.
  • Mouaket, I.M. and Sinha, K.C., 1991. Cost effectiveness of routine maintenance on rigid pavements. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University, Publication FHWA/JHRP-91-11.
  • Peshkin, D.G., Hoerner, T.E., and Zimmerman, K.A., 2004. Optimal timing of pavement preventive maintenance treatment applications. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, Publication NCHRP 523.
  • Ramaswamy, R. and Ben-Akiva, M., 1990. Estimation of highway pavement deterioration from in-service pavements data. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1272, 96–106.
  • Sinha, K.C., et al., 1988. Assessment of routine maintenance needs and optimal use of maintenance funds: final report. West Lafayette, IN: FHWA, Publication FHWA/IN/JHRP-88/18.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.