182
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Risk and expected pay factor analysis for assessing gap and dense-graded Superpave mixture specifications

, &
Pages 69-79 | Received 31 Oct 2013, Accepted 04 Nov 2013, Published online: 13 May 2014

References

  • AASHTO, 2009. Standard Recommended Practice for Acceptance Sampling Plans for Highway Construction. R9-09.Washington, DC: AASHTO.
  • Burati, J., 2005. Risks with multiple pay factor acceptance plans. Transportation Research Record No. 1907.Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 42–97.
  • Burati, J., 2006. Evaluating specification limits. Transportation Research Record No. 1946.Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 92–98.
  • Burati, J. and Weed, R., 2006. Accuracy and precision of typical quality measures. Transportation Research Record No. 1946.Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 82–91.
  • Burati, J., Weed, R., Hughes, C., and Hill, H., 2011. Optimal procedures for quality assurance specifications. Report FHWA-RD-02-095. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).
  • Goulias, D., Schwartz, C., Karimi, S., and Hughes, C., 2009. Increasing durability of hot mix asphalt pavements designed with the superpave system. Research Report MD-SP708B4E. Hanover, MD: Maryland Department of Transportation State Highway Administration. Office of Materials and Technology.
  • Karimi, S., Goulias, D., and Schwartz, C., 2011. Evaluation of Superpave HMA mixture properties at the plant versus behind the paver: statistical comparison of QC and QA data. ASCE Journal of Transportation Engineering, 138 (7), 924–932.
  • NCHRP, 1998. Project 9-09: refinement of the Superpave gyratory compaction procedure. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
  • NCHRP, 2006. Project 9-25: requirements for voids in mineral aggregate for Superpave mixtures. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board. Report 567.
  • NCHRP, 2006. Project 9-31: air void requirements for Superpave mix design. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board. Report 567.
  • NCHRP, 2010. Project 9-33: a mix design manual for hot mix asphalt. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board. Report 673.
  • NCHRP, 2013. Project 10-92: optimizing the risk and cost of materials QA programs. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
  • TRB, 2009. Circular E-C137: glossary of highway quality assurance terms. Washington, DC: TRB.
  • Villiers, C., Mehta, Y., Lopp, G., Tia, M., and Roque, R., 2003. Evaluation of percent-within-limits-construction specification parameters. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 221–228.
  • Weed, R.M., 1996. Quality assurance software for the personal computer. Publication No. FHWA-SA-96-026.Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.