References
- AASHTO, 2009. Standard Recommended Practice for Acceptance Sampling Plans for Highway Construction. R9-09.Washington, DC: AASHTO.
- Burati, J., 2005. Risks with multiple pay factor acceptance plans. Transportation Research Record No. 1907.Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 42–97.
- Burati, J., 2006. Evaluating specification limits. Transportation Research Record No. 1946.Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 92–98.
- Burati, J. and Weed, R., 2006. Accuracy and precision of typical quality measures. Transportation Research Record No. 1946.Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, 82–91.
- Burati, J., Weed, R., Hughes, C., and Hill, H., 2011. Optimal procedures for quality assurance specifications. Report FHWA-RD-02-095. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).
- Goulias, D., Schwartz, C., Karimi, S., and Hughes, C., 2009. Increasing durability of hot mix asphalt pavements designed with the superpave system. Research Report MD-SP708B4E. Hanover, MD: Maryland Department of Transportation State Highway Administration. Office of Materials and Technology.
- Karimi, S., Goulias, D., and Schwartz, C., 2011. Evaluation of Superpave HMA mixture properties at the plant versus behind the paver: statistical comparison of QC and QA data. ASCE Journal of Transportation Engineering, 138 (7), 924–932.
- NCHRP, 1998. Project 9-09: refinement of the Superpave gyratory compaction procedure. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
- NCHRP, 2006. Project 9-25: requirements for voids in mineral aggregate for Superpave mixtures. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board. Report 567.
- NCHRP, 2006. Project 9-31: air void requirements for Superpave mix design. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board. Report 567.
- NCHRP, 2010. Project 9-33: a mix design manual for hot mix asphalt. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board. Report 673.
- NCHRP, 2013. Project 10-92: optimizing the risk and cost of materials QA programs. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
- TRB, 2009. Circular E-C137: glossary of highway quality assurance terms. Washington, DC: TRB.
- Villiers, C., Mehta, Y., Lopp, G., Tia, M., and Roque, R., 2003. Evaluation of percent-within-limits-construction specification parameters. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 221–228.
- Weed, R.M., 1996. Quality assurance software for the personal computer. Publication No. FHWA-SA-96-026.Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.