Determination of CBR for fine-grained soils using a dynamic lightweight cone penetrometer

References

• Abu-farsakh, M., Khalid A., P.E., Nazzal, M., and Seyman, E., 2004. Assessment of in-situ test technology for construction control of base courses and embankments. Louisiana: Louisiana Transportation Research Center. Report Number FHWA/LA.04/385.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Amoudi, O., Asi, I., Wahhab, H., and Khan, Z., 2002. Clegg hammer – California bearing ratio correlations. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 14, 512–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AS 1289.3.1.1, 2009. Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes – soil classification tests – determination of the liquid limit of a soil – four point Casagrande method. Sydney: Australian Standard.
   Google Scholar
• AS 1289.3.2.1, 2009. Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes – soil classification tests – determination of the plastic limit of a soil – standard method. Sydney: Australian Standard.
   Google Scholar
• AS 1289.5.1.1, 2003. Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes – soil compaction and density tests – determination of the dry density/moisture content relation of a soil using standard compactive effort. Sydney: Australian Standard.
   Google Scholar
• AS 1289.6.1.1, 1998. Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes – soil strength and consolidation tests – determination of the California bearing ratio of a soil – Standard laboratory method for a remoulded specimen. Sydney: Australian Standard.
   Google Scholar
• AS 1289.6.1.3, 1998. Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes – soil strength and consolidation tests – determination of the California Bearing Ratio of a soil – standard field-in-place method. Sydney: Australian Standard.
   Google Scholar
• AS 1289.6.3.2, 1997. Methods of testing soil for engineering purposes– soil strength and consolidation tests – determination of the penetration resistance of a soil – 9 kg dynamic cone penetrometer test. Sydney: Australian Standard.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D1558-10, 2010. Standard test method for moisture content penetration resistance relationships of fine-grained soils. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D1883-07e2, 2007. Standard test method for CBR (California bearing ratio) of laboratory-compacted soils (D1883-07e2). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D4429-09a, 2009. Standard test method for CBR (California bearing ratio) of soils in place, Annual Book of ASTM Standards. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D6951-03, 2003. Standard test method for use of the dynamic cone penetrometer in shallow pavement applications. Annual book of ASTM standards. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• Austroads, 2010. Guide to pavement technology. Part 2: pavement structural design. Sydney, Australia: Austroads.
   Google Scholar
• Black, W.P.M., 1961. The calculation of laboratory and in situ values of California bearing ratio from bearing capacity data. Geotechnique, 11, 14–21.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Hossain, M., and Latorella, T.M., 1999. Use of falling weight deflectometer and dynamic cone penetrometer in pavement evaluation. Transportation Research Record, 1655, 145–151.
   Google Scholar
• Coonse, J., 1999. Estimating California bearing ratio of cohesive piedmont residual soil using the Scala dynamic cone penetrometer. Thesis (Master), North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
   Google Scholar
• De Beer, M., 1991. Use of the dynamic cone penetrometer in the design of road structures. Geo-techniques in the African environment, Rotterdam: CRC Press/Balkema, 167–183.
   Google Scholar
• Ese, D., Myre, J., Noss, P.M., and Vaernea, E., 1994. The use of dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP) for road strengthening design in Norway. Proceeding of international conference on bearing capacity of road and airfield, 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Fumio, O., Shuzo, H., and Urushizaki, 2004. SH data logger penetrator–Dynamic cone penetrator with data logger – an unique logging tool for near surface soil investigation. The tenth formation evaluation symposium, Chiba, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Gabr, M.A., et al., 2000. DCP criteria for performance evaluation of pavement layers. Journal of Performance and Constructed Facilities, 14, 141–148.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, G.H., 2007. Correlation of California bearing ratio with shear strength parameters. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1989, 148–153.
   Google Scholar
• Hammons, M.I., et al., 1998. Development and testing of an automated dynamic cone Penetrometer for Florida department of transportation. Draft Report of Contract FLDOT-ADCPWPI #0510751.
   Google Scholar
• Harison, J.A., 1987. Correlation between California Bearing Ratio and dynamic cone penetrometer strength measurement of soils. Proceedings – Institution of Civil Engineers. UK, Part 2, 832–844.
   Google Scholar
• Harison, J.A., 1989. In situ California bearing ratio determination by dynamic cone penetrometer testing using a laboratory based correlation. Australian Road Research, 19 (4), 313–317.
   Google Scholar
• Hassan, A., 1996. The effect of material parameters on dynamic cone penetrometer results for fine grained soils and granular materials. Thesis (PhD). Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma State University.
   Google Scholar
• Kleyn, E.G., 1975. The use of the dynamic cone penetrometer. Report. Number (2/74). Pretoria: Transvaal Roads Department.
   Google Scholar
• Kleyn, E.G. and Savage, P.E., 1982. The application of the pavement DCP to determine the bearing properties and performance of road pavements. International symposium on bearing capacity of roads and airfields. Trodheim, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Livneh, M., 1987. The use of dynamic cone Penetrometer in determining the strength of existing pavements and subgrades. Proceedings of Southeast Asian geotechnical conference. Bangkok, Thailand.
   Google Scholar
• Livneh, M., Ishai, I., and Livneh, N.A., 1992. Automated DCP device versus manual DCP device. Road and Transport Research, 1, 48–61.
   Google Scholar
• Livneh, M., Ishai, I., and Livneh, N.A., 1994. Effect of vertical confinement on dynamic cone penetrometer strength values in pavement and subgrade evaluations. Transportation Research Record, 1473, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadi, S.D., Nikoudel, M.R., and Khamehchiyan, M., 2008. Application of the dynamic cone penetrometer for determination of the engineering parameters of sandy soils. Engineering Geology, 101, 195–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazzal, M., 2014. Non-nuclear methods for compaction control of unbound materials. National Cooperative Highway Research Program Synthesis 456, Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, B.T. and Mohajerani, A., 2012. A new lightweight dynamic cone penetrometer for laboratory and field applications. Australian Geomechanics Journal, 47, 41–50.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, F., Hammons, M., and Hall, J., 1998. Development of an automated dynamic cone penetrometer for evaluating soils and pavement materials. Final Report Project No. FLDOT-ADCP-WPI #0510751, Gainesville, FL: Florida Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, R.P., 1945. Proctor on military airfield. Transaction of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 110, 799–809.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, R.P., 1948. Laboratory soil compaction methods, penetration resistance measurements, and the indicated saturated penetration resistance. Proceedings of the second international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering. Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Scala, A.J., 1959. Simple method of flexible pavement design using cone penetrometers. Proceedings of 2nd Australian—New Zealand conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering. New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R.B. and Pratt, D.N., 1983. A field study of in situ California bearing ratio and dynamic cone penetrometer testing for road subgrade investigations. Australian Road Research, 13, 285–294.
   Google Scholar
• Van Vuuren, D.J., 1969. Rapid determination of CBR with the portable dynamic cone penetrometer. The Rhodesign Engineer, 7, 852–854.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, S.L., Grau, R.H., and Williams, R.P., 1992. Description and application of dual mass dynamic cone penetrometer. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. Report Number GL-92-3.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, S.L., Brown, R.W., and Porter, J.R., 1994. Force projection site evaluation using the electric cone penetrometer and the dynamic cone penetrometer. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Report Number GL-94-17.
   Google Scholar