Flexible pavement maintenance programming considering the minimisation of maintenance and rehabilitation costs and the maximisation of the residual value of pavements

References

• AASHTO, 1993. Guide for design of pavement structures. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 1–640.
   Google Scholar
• AIPCR, 2000. Highway development and management, volume one: overview of HDM-4. Paris: World Road Association, 1–53.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, P., 2007. Multi-year maintenance optimisation for paved public roads: segment based modelling and price-directive decomposition. Thesis (PhD). Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden, 1–214.
   Google Scholar
• C-SHRP, 2002. Pavement structural design practices across. Ottawa: Canadian Strategic Highway Research Program, 1–10. C-SHRP Technical Brief No. 23.
   Google Scholar
• CRP, 2013. Proceedings of the 7th Portuguese road conference. CD ed. Lisboa: Laboratório Nacional de Engenharia Civil.
   Google Scholar
• Das, I., 1999. On characterizing the ‘knee’ of the Pareto curve based on normal boundary intersection. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 18, 107–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, J., et al., 2006. Professional visual studio 2005 team system. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley Publishing, Inc, 1–660.
   Google Scholar
• Deb, K., 2008. Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. West Sussex: Wiley, 1–515.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, A., 2001. Pavement maintenance optimisation of road networks. Thesis (PhD), Coimbra University, Coimbra, Portugal, 1–383 (in Portuguese).
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, A., Picado-Santos, L., and Antunes, A., 2002. A segment-linked optimization model for deterministic pavement management systems. The International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 3 (2), 95–105.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, A., Meneses, S., and Vicente, F., 2009. Pavement management system for Oliveira do Hospital, Portugal. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Transport, 162 (3), 157–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, A., et al., 2008. Analysis of pavement performance models for use in pavement management systems. In: Proceedings of the third European pavement and asset management conference. CD ed. Coimbra, Portugal, 1–10. Paper 1136.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, A., et al., 2011. Selection of pavement performance models for use in the Portuguese PMS. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 12 (1), 87–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FICO, 2009. Xpress-optimizer: reference manual, release 20.00. Leamington Spa: Fair Isaac Corporation, 1–470.
   Google Scholar
• Fwa, T., Chan, W., and Hoque, K., 2000. Multiobjective optimization for pavement maintenance programming. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 126 (5), 367–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendreau, M. and Potvin, J., 2005. Metaheuristics in combinatorial optimization. Annals of Operations Research, 140 (1), 189–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, R., 2014. Reinventing the (pavement management) wheel. In: Distinguished lecture, 5th international conference on managing pavements. Available from: http://www.asphalt.org/Pubs/PubsO.html.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, A., et al., 2006. Derivative-free generation and interpolation of convex Pareto optimal IMRT plans. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 51 (24), 6349–6369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, J., 1975. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horta, C., et al., 2013. The EP's pavement management system: balance of a consolidated implementation. In: Proceedings of the 7th Portuguese road conference. CD ed. Lisboa: Laboratório Nacional de Engenharia Civil, 1–10. Paper 149_Art_T5_7CRP_2013.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, C. and Masud, A., 1979. Multiple objective decision making: methods and applications: a state-of-the-art survey. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• IBM, 2009. IBM ILOG CPLEX 12.1: reference manual. Armonk, NY: IBM Corporation, 1–884.
   Google Scholar
• Ihs, A. and Sjögren, L., 2003. An overview of HDM-4 and the Swedish pavement management system. Linköping: VTI – Infrastructure Maintenance, 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Iniestra, J. and Gutiérrez, J., 2009. Multi-criteria decisions on interdependent infrastructure transportation projects using an evolutionary-based framework. Applied Soft Computing, 9 (2), 512–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, J. and Dahlgren, J., 2001. Prediction model in the Swedish PMS. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on managing pavements. CD ed. Seattle, WA 1–10. Paper 100.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, J. and Potucek, J., 2001. Pavement management systems in Sweden. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on managing pavements. CD ed. Seattle, WA 1–12. Paper 097.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lotfi, F., et al., 2007. A new method for complex decision making based on TOPSIS for complex decision making problems with fuzzy data. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 1 (60), 2981–2987.
   Google Scholar
• Marler, R. and Arora, J., 2004. Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 26, 369–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meneses, S. and Ferreira, A., 2013. Pavement maintenance programming considering two objectives: maintenance costs and user costs. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 14 (2), 206–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meneses, S., Ferreira, A., and Collop, A., 2013. Multi-objective decision-aid tool for pavement management. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Transport, 166 (2), 79–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalewicz, Z. and Fogel, D., 2004. How to solve it: modern heuristics. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Miettinen, K., 1999. Nonlinear multi-objective optimization. Boston, MA: Kluwer, 1–324.
   Google Scholar
• Mostafavi, A. and Karamouz, M., 2010. Selecting appropriate project delivery system: fuzzy approach with risk analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136 (8), 923–930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picado-Santos, L. and Ferreira, A., 2007. Development and implementation of a new pavement management system. In: Proceedings of the fifth international symposium on maintenance and rehabilitation of pavements and technological control. CD ed. Utah, USA, 433–438.
   Google Scholar
• Picado-Santos, L. and Ferreira, A., 2008. Contributions to the development of the Portuguese road administration's pavement management system. In: Proceedings of the third European pavement and asset management conference. CD ed.  Coimbra, Portugal, 1–10. Paper 1138.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Picado-Santos, L., et al., 2006. The evaluation of maintenance and rehabilitation strategies in the pavement management system of the Portuguese road administration. In: Proceedings of the 4th Portuguese road congress. Lisbon, Portugal (in Portuguese), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Randolph, N. and Gardner, D., 2008. Professional visual studio 2008. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley Publishing, Inc., 1–946.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, M., Epps, R., and Kennedy, C., 2004. Development of deterioration models for local authority roads. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Municipal Engineer, 157 (3), 167–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trindade, M. and Horta, C., 2009. Pavement management system of Estradas de Portugal, S.A. In: Proceedings of the 15th Congreso Ibero-Latinoamericano del Asfalto. CD ed.  Lisboa, Portugal (in Portuguese). 1351–1360.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, F., Zhang, Z., and Machemehl, R., 2003. Decision making problem for managing pavement maintenance and rehabilitation projects. Transportation Research Record, 1853, 21–28.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Z. and Flintsch, G., 2009. Pavement preservation optimization considering multiple objectives and budget variability. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 135 (5), 305–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, J., et al., 2010. Performance objectives selection model in public-private partnership projects based on the perspective of stakeholders. Journal of Management in Engineering, 26 (2), 89–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar