Moisture damage assessment using surface energy, bitumen stripping and the SATS moisture conditioning procedure

References

• Abo-QudaisS. and Al-ShweilyH., 2007. Effect of aggregate properties on asphalt mixtures stripping and creep behavior. Construction and Building Materials, 21 (9), 1886–1898. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AhmadN., 2011. Asphalt mixture moisture sensitivity evaluation using surface energy parameters. Dissertation (PhD). University of Nottingham, Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• AireyG.D. and ChoiY.K., 2002. State of the art report on moisture sensitivity test methods for bituminous pavement materials. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 3 (4), 355–372. doi:10.1080/14680629.2002.9689930.
   Google Scholar
• AireyG.D., et al., 2003. Development of an accelerated durability assessment procedure for high modulus base (HMB) materials. In: Proceedings of the 6th international RILEM symposium on performance testing and evaluation of bituminous materials, PTEBM'03, Zurich, 160–166.
   Google Scholar
• AireyG.D., et al., 2005. Combined laboratory ageing/moisture sensitivity assessment of high modulus base asphalt mixtures. Proceedings of the association of asphalt paving technologists, 74, 307–346.
   Google Scholar
• AireyG.D., et al., 2007. Asphalt mixture moisture damage assessment combined with surface energy characterization. In: Proceedings of the international conference on advanced characterisation of pavement and soil engineering materials, Vol. 1, Athens, 739–748.
   Google Scholar
• AireyG.D., et al., 2008. The influence of aggregate, filler and bitumen on asphalt mixture moisture damage. Construction and Building Materials, 22 (9), 2015–2024. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.07.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annual Local Authority Road Maintenance (Alarm) Survey Asphalt Industry Alliance. 2010. Available from: www.asphaltindustryalliance.com/alarm.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Anon, 2000. Resistance of compacted bituminous mixtures to moisture induced damage. Washington, DC: AASHTO T283-99American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• AschenbrenerT., 1995. Evaluation of Hamburg wheel-tracking device to predict moisture-damage in hot-mix asphalt. Transportation Research Record, 1492, 193–201.
   Google Scholar
• Audit Scotland, Maintaining Scotland's roads: a follow-up report. 2010. Available from: www.audit-scotland.gov.uk/docs/central/2010/nr_110216_road_maintenance.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• BhasinA., 2006. Development of methods to quantify bitumen-aggregate adhesion and loss of adhesion due to water. Dissertation (PhD). Texas A&M University, USA.
   Google Scholar
• BhasinA., et al., 2006. Limits on adhesive bond energy for improved resistance of hot-mix asphalt to moisture damage. Transportation Research Record, 1970, 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• British Standards Institution, 2003a. Bituminous mixtures – test methods for hot mix asphalt – Part 6: determination of bulk density of bituminous specimens. London: BS EN 12697-6.
   Google Scholar
• British Standards Institution, 2003b. Bituminous mixtures – test methods for hot mix asphalt – Part 8: determination of void characteristics of bituminous specimens. London: BS EN 12697-8.
   Google Scholar
• British Standards Institution, 2004. Bituminous mixtures – test methods for hot mix asphalt – Part 26: stiffness. London: BS EN 12697-26.
   Google Scholar
• British Standards Institution, 2009. Bituminous mixtures – test methods for hot mix asphalt – Part 5: determination of the maximum density. London: BS EN 12697-5.
   Google Scholar
• CaroS., et al., 2008a. Moisture susceptibility of asphalt mixtures, Part 1: mechanisms. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 9 (2), 81–98, doi:10.1080/10298430701792128.
   Google Scholar
• CaroS., et al., 2008b. Moisture susceptibility of asphalt mixtures, Part 2: characterisation and modelling. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 9 (2), 99–114. doi:10.1080/10298430701792144.
   Google Scholar
• CaroS., et al., 2010. Micromechanical modeling of the influence of material properties on moisture-induced damage in asphalt mixtures. Construction and Building Materials, 24 (7), 1184–1192. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.12.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChengD., 2002. Surface free energy of asphalt aggregate system and performance analysis of asphalt concrete based on surface free energy. Dissertation (PhD), Texas A&M University, USA.
   Google Scholar
• ChengD., et al., 2002a. Surface energy measurement of asphalt and its application to predicting fatigue and healing in asphalt mixtures. Transportation Research Record, 1810, 44–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChengD., et al., 2002b. Moisture damage evaluation of asphalt mixtures by considering both moisture diffusion and repeated-load conditions. Transportation Research Record, 1832, 42–49.
   Google Scholar
• ChoiY.K., 2005. Development of the saturation ageing tensile stiffness (SATS) test for high modulus base materials. Thesis (PhD), School of Civil Engineering, University of Nottingham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• ChoiY., et al., 2002. Assessment of the durability of high modulus base (HMB) materials. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on the bearing capacity of roads, railways and airfields, Lisbon, Portugal, Vol. 2, 823–830.
   Google Scholar
• CollopA.C., et al., 2004a. Development of the saturation ageing tensile stiffness (SATS) test. Proceedings of the ICE Transport, 157 (3), 163–171. doi:10.1680/tran.2004.157.3.163.
   Google Scholar
• CollopA.C., et al., 2004b. Development of a combined ageing/moisture sensitivity laboratory test. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Eurasphalt and Eurobitume Congress, Vienna, Vol. 2, 1238–1250.
   Google Scholar
• CooperK.E. and BrownS.F., 1989. Developments of a simple apparatus for the measurement of the mechanical properties of asphalt mixes. Proceedings of the Eurobitume symposium, Madrid, 494–498.
   Google Scholar
• EmeryJ. and SeddikH., 1997. Moisture-damage of asphalt pavements and antistripping additives: causes, identification, testing and mitigation. Ottawa, Canada: Transportation Association of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• ErbilH.Y., 2006. Surface chemistry of solid and liquid interfaces. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• FowkesF.M., 1962. Determination of interfacial tensions, contact angles, and dispersion forces in surfaces by assuming additivity of intermolecular interactions in surfaces. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 66 (2), 382. doi:10.1021/j100808a524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GilmoreD.W., et al., 1985. Changes in asphalt concrete durability resulting from exposure to multiple cycles of freezing and thawing. ASTM Special Technical Publication, 899, 73–88.
   Google Scholar
• GoodR.J., 1992. Contact angle, wetting, and adhesion: a critical review. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 6 (12), 1269–1302. doi:10.1163/156856192X00629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GoodR.J. and van OssC.J., 1991. The modern theory of contact angles and the hydrogen bond components of surface energies, modern approach to wettability: theory and application. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• GrenfellJ., et al., 2012. Optimising the moisture durability SATS conditioning parameters for universal asphalt mixture application. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 13 (5), 433–450. doi:10.1080/10298436.2012.655740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrenfellJ.R.A., et al., 2014. Assessing asphalt mixture moisture susceptibility through intrinsic adhesion, bitumen stripping and mechanical damage. International Journal of Road Materials and Pavement Design, 15 (1), 131–152. doi:10.1080/14680629.2013.863162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HorgniesM., et al., 2011. Influence of the interfacial composition on the adhesion between aggregates and bitumen: investigations by EDX, XPS and peel tests. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 31 (4), 238–247. doi:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HuangS., et al., 2005. Impact of lime modification of asphalt and freeze–thaw cycling on the asphalt–aggregate interaction and moisture resistance to moisture damage. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 17 (6), 711–718. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:6(711).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KandhalP.S., 1994. Field and laboratory evaluation of stripping in asphalt pavements: state of the art. Transportation Research Record, 1454, 36–47.
   Google Scholar
• KennedyT.W., RobertsF.L., and LeeK.W., 1982. Evaluation of moisture susceptibility of asphalt mixtures using the Texas freeze–thaw pedestal test. Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt and Paving Technologists, 51, 327–341.
   Google Scholar
• KennedyT.W., RobertsF.L., and LeeK.W., 1983. Evaluation of moisture effects on asphalt concrete mixtures. Transportation Research Record, 911, 134–143.
   Google Scholar
• KennedyT.W., RobertsF.L., and LeeK.W., 1984. Evaluating moisture susceptibility of asphalt mixtures using the Texas boiling test. Transportation Research Record, 968, 45–54.
   Google Scholar
• KutayM.E., et al., 2007. Computational and experimental evaluation of hydraulic conductivity anisotropy in hot-mix asphalt. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 8 (1), 29–43. doi:10.1080/10298430600819147.
   Google Scholar
• LittleD.N. and BhasinA., 2006. Using surface energy measurements to select materials for asphalt pavement. NCHRP project 9–37, final report. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• LiuY., et al., 2014. Examination of moisture sensitivity of aggregate-bitumen bonding strength using loose asphalt mixture and physico-chemical surface energy property tests. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 15 (7), 657–670. doi:10.1080/10298436.2013.855312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manual Series No. 24 (MS-24), 2007. Moisture sensitivity: best practices to minimize moisture sensitivity in asphalt mixtures. Lexington, KY: Asphalt Institute.
   Google Scholar
• MasadE., Al omariA., and ChenH.C., 2007. Computations of permeability tensor coefficients and anisotropy of asphalt concrete based on microstructure simulation of fluid flow. Computational Materials Science, 40 (4), 449–459. doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2007.01.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MaugisD., 1999. Contact, adhesion and rupture of elastic solids. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• MCHW, 2004. Method for the assessment of durability of compacted asphalt mixtures using the saturation ageing tensile stiffness (SATS) tests. Manual of Contract Document for Highways Works: Clause 953, Highways Agency, UK.
   Google Scholar
• MillerJ.S. and BellingerW.Y., 2003. Distress identification manual for the long-term pavement performance program. Publication FHWA-RD-03-031McLean, VA: FHWA, Office of Infrastructure Research and Development.
   Google Scholar
• PetersenJ.C., et al., 1982. Chemistry of asphalt–aggregate interaction: relationship with pavement moisture-damage prediction test. Transportation Research Record, 843, 95–104.
   Google Scholar
• ShakibaM., et al., 2013. Continuum coupled moisture-mechanical damage model for asphalt concrete. Transportation Research Record, 2372 (1), 72–82. doi:10.3141/2372-09.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShawD. J., 1991. Introduction to colloid and surface chemistry. 4th ed.Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• SingK.S.W., 1969. Utilisation of adsorption data in the BET region. Proceedings; international symposium on surface area determination, Bristol, UK.
   Google Scholar
• SolaimanianM., et al., 2003. Test methods to predict moisture sensitivity of hot mix asphalt pavements. Proceedings national seminar on moisture sensitivity of asphalt pavements, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• TerrelR.L. and Al-SwailmiS., 1994. Water sensitivity of asphalt–aggregate mixes: test selection. SHRP-A-403Washington, DC: Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• VuorinenM. and HartikainenO.-K., 2001. A new ultrasonic method for measuring stripping resistance of bitumen on aggregate. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 2 (3), 297–309. doi:10.1080/14680629.2001.9689905.
   Google Scholar