Evaluating the performance of geosynthetic-reinforced unpaved roads using plate load tests

References

• ARA, Inc., ERES Consultants Division, 2004. Guide for mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures. Available from: http://www.trb.org/mepdg/guide.htm.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D1196-93, 2004. Standard test method for non-repetitive static plate load tests of soils and flexible pavement components, for use in evaluation and design of airport and highway pavements. Annual book of ASTM Standards: Vol. 04.08, Soil and Rock.
   Google Scholar
• Abu-FarsakhM. and ChenQ., 2011. Evaluation of geogrid base reinforcement in flexible pavement using cyclic plate load testing. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 12 (3), 275–288. doi:10.1080/10298436.2010.549565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu-FarsakhM.Y., AlshibliK.A., NazzalM.D., and SeymanE., 2004. Assessment of insitu test technology for construction control of base courses and embankments. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana Transportation and Research Center, Report No. FHWA/LA.04/389.
   Google Scholar
• Abu-FarsakhM.Y., ChenQ., and YoonS., 2008. Use of reinforced soil foundation (RSF) to support shallow foundation. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana Transportation Research Center, Report No. FHWA/LA.04/423, 195 p..
   Google Scholar
• Al-QadiI.L., BrandonT.L, ValentineR J., LacinaB.A., and SmithT.E., 1994. Laboratory evaluation of geosynthetic reinforced pavement sections. Transportation Research Record, 1439, 25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Al-QadiI.L., BrandonT.L., and BhuttaS.A., 1997. Geosynthetic stabilized flexible pavements. In: Proceedings of the conference Geosynthetics '97, Long Beach, CA, USA, March, 1997647–661.
   Google Scholar
• Al-QadiI.L., DessoukyS.H., KwonJ., and TutumluerE., 2008. Geogrid in flexible pavements: validated mechanism. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2045 (1), 102–109. doi:10.3141/2045-12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BauerG.E. and El HalimA.O.A., 1987. The performance of geogrid reinforced road bases. Construction & Building Materials, 1 (2), 71–75. doi:10.1016/0950-0618(87)90002-X.
   Google Scholar
• CancelliA. and MontanelliF., 1999. In-ground test for geosynthetic reinforced flexible paved roads. In: Proceedings of the conference Geosynthetics '99, Boston, MA, USA, April863–878.
   Google Scholar
• ChenQ., 2007. An experimental study on characteristics and behavior of reinforced soil foundation. (PhD dissertation), Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, USA.
   Google Scholar
• ChenQ. and Abu-FarsakhM., 2012. Structural contribution of geogrid reinforcement in pavement. ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication No. 225: State of the Art and Practice in Geotechnical Engineering, 756–762.
   Google Scholar
• ChenQ., Abu-FarsakhM., and TaoM., 2009. Laboratory evaluation of geogrid base reinforcement and corresponding instrumentation program. Geotechnical Testing Journal, ASTM, 32 (6), 516–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GabrM., 2001. Cyclic plate loading tests on geogrid reinforced roads. Research Rep. to Tensar Earth Technologies, NC State Univ., Tensar International, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• GiroudJ.P. and HanJ., 2004a. Design method for geogrid-reinforced unpaved roads. I. Development of design method. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 130 (8), 775–786. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:8(775).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GiroudJ.P. and HanJ., 2004b. Design method for geogrid-reinforced unpaved roads. II. Calibration and applications. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 130 (8), 775–786. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:8(775).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GiroudJ.P. and NoirayL., 1981. Geotextile-reinforced unpaved roaddesign. Journal Geotechnical Engineering, 107 (9), 1233–1254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HaliburtonT.A. and BarronJ.V., 1983. Optimum-depth method for design of fabric-reinforced unsurfaced roads. Transportation Research Record 916. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, 26–32.
   Google Scholar
• HanJ., QianY., PokharelS.K., and ParsonsR.L., 2011. Stress analysis on triangular-aperture geogrid-reinforced bases over weak subgrade under cyclic loading. An Experimental Study. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2204, 83–91.
   Google Scholar
• HoulsbyG.T. and BurdH.J., 1999. Understanding the behavior of unpaved roads on soft clay. In: Proceedings of the 12th European conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Amsterdam, Netherlands, June 199931–44.
   Google Scholar
• HufenusR., RueeggerR., BanjacR., MayorO., SpringmanS.M., and BronnimannR., 2006. Full-scale field tests on geosynthetic reinforced unpaved roads on soft subgrade. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 24 (1), 21–37. doi:10.1016/j.geotexmem.2005.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IsmailI. and RaymondG.P., 1995. Geosynthetic reinforcement of granular layered soils. Geosynthetics '95, Nashville, TN, USA, IFAI, St. Paul, MN, USA1, 317–330.
   Google Scholar
• KinneyT.C. and BarenbergE.J., 1979. The mechanisms by which fabrics stabilize aggregate layers on soft subgrades. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experimentation Station. Miscellaneous paper GL = 79-5. 55 p.
   Google Scholar
• KinneyT.C., AbbottJ., and SchulerJ., 1998. Benefits of using geogrids for base reinforcement with regard to rutting. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1611 (1), 86–96. doi:10.3141/1611-11.
   Google Scholar
• LengJ., 2002. Characteristics and behavior of geogrid-reinforced aggregate under cyclic load. (PhD thesis), North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA.
   Google Scholar
• LengJ. and GabrM., 2002. Characteristics of geogrid-reinforced aggregate under cyclic load. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1786 (1), 29–35. doi:10.3141/1786-04.
   Google Scholar
• MeyerhofG.G. and HannaA.M., 1978. Ultimate bearing capacity of foundations on layered soils under inclined load. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 15 (4), 565–572. doi:10.1139/t78-060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moghaddas-NejadF. and SmallJ.C., 1996. Effect of geogrid reinforcement in model track tests on pavements. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 122 (6), 468–474. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1996)122:6(468).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MontanelliF., ZhaoA., and RimoldiP., 1997. Geosynthetic-reinforced pavement system: testing & design. In: J.N.Paulson, ed. Geosynthetics '97 Proceedings, Long Beach, CA. Vol. 2. Roseville, MN: Industrial Fabrics Association International, 619–632.
   Google Scholar
• PerkinsS.W., 1999. Geosynthetic reinforcement of flexible pavements laboratory based pavement test sections. Bozeman, MT: State of Montana department of transportation research, and development and technology transfer program, Final Report FHWA/MT-99-001/8138, 108 pp.
   Google Scholar
• PerkinsS.W., 2002. Evaluation of geosynthetic reinforced flexible pavement systems using two pavement test facilities. Helena, MT: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Report No. FHWA/MT-02-008/20040.
   Google Scholar
• TarefderR.A., SahaN., HallJ.W., and NgT.-T.P., 2008. Evaluating weak subgrade for pavement design and performance prediction: a case study of US 550. Journal of GeoEngineering, 3 (1), 13–25, April 2008. 10.1080/17486020701730058.
   Google Scholar
• TingleJ.S. and JerseyS.R., 2005. Cyclic plate load testing of geosynthetic-reinforced unbound aggregate roads. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1936 (1), 60–69, National Research Council. 10.3141/1936-08.
   Google Scholar
• YooC., 2001. Laboratory investigation of bearing capacity behavior of strip footing on geogrid-reinforced sand slope. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 19 (5), 279–298. doi:10.1016/S0266-1144(01)00009-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar