Gypsum sand resilient modulus during cyclic soaking and drying

References

• AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials), 1986a. AASHTO guide for design of pavement structures. Washington, DC:
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials), 1986b. Standard specification for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. Part II. 14 ed. Washington, DC:
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials), 1993. AASHTO guide for design of pavement structures – 1993. Washington, DC:
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials), 1995. DT180-95: the moisture–density relation using a 4.45-kg (10-lb) Rammer and a 457-mm (18-in) drop. Washington DC: AASHTO.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials), 1993. D 2487-93: ASTM standard classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials), 2007. D1883: standard test method for CBR (California bearing ratio) of laboratory-compacted soils. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials), 2008. D 2845-08: standard test method for laboratory determination of pulse velocities and ultrasonic elastic constants of rock. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, T.W. and Sclove, S.L., 1978. An introduction to the statistical analysis of data. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• BSI (British Standard Institution, 1990. BS 1377: methods of test for soils for civil engineering purposes  – Part 3: chemical tests BSI, London: Milton Keynes.
   Google Scholar
• Garber, N.J. and Hoel, L.A., 1997. Traffic and highway engineering. 2nd ed. Boston, MA: PWS Publishing Company, a division of International Thomson Publishing-Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Griffiths, D.H. and King, R.F., 1965. Applied geophysics for engineers and geologists. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hight, D.W. and Stevens, M.G., 1982. An analysis of the California bearing ratio test in saturated clays. Geotechnique, 32 (4), 315–322. doi:10.1680/geot.1982.32.4.315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horta, J.C., 1985. Salt heaving in the Sahara. Geotechnique, 35 (3), 329–337. doi:10.1680/geot.1985.35.3.329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horta, J.C., 1989. Carbonate and gypsum soils properties and classifications. In: Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, 1: 53–56, Rio de Janeiro.
   Google Scholar
• Kevin, J.G. and Mohammad, L.N., 2003. Comparative evaluation of subgrade resilient modulus from non-destructive, in-situ, and laboratory methods. Baton Rouge, LA: Technology Transfer Program, Research Project 03-3p Louisiana Transportation Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Parasnis, D.S., 1962. Principles of applied geophysics. London: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Rainwater, N.R., et al., 1999. Comprehensive monitoring systems for measuring sub-grade moisture conditions. Journal of Transportation Engineering, ASCE, 125 (5), 439–448. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1999)125:5(439).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razouki, S.S. and Al-Shefi, A.M., 2002. Effects and observations of surcharge load on the laboratory CBR and resilient modulus values of roadbed soil. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 35 (1), 89–95. doi:10.1144/qjegh.35.1.89.
   Google Scholar
• Razouki, S.S. and Kuttah, D.K., 2004. Effect of soaking period and surcharge load on resilient modulus and California bearing ratio of Gypsiferous soils. The Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 37 (2), 155–164. doi:10.1144/1470-9236/04-002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razouki, S.S. and Kuttah, D.K., 2005. Determining the resilient modulus using hyperbolic stress–strain relationship of CBR test results of a Gypsiferous subgrade soil. In: Proceedings of international conference on problematic soils, 25–27 May Famagusta, N. Cyprus: Eastern Mediterranean University, 1285–1293.
   Google Scholar
• Razouki, S.S. and Salem, B.M., 2014. Soaking–drying frequency effect on gypsum-rich roadbed sand. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 15 (10), 933–939. doi:10.1080/10298436.2014.893326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razouki, S.S. and Salem, B.M, 2015. Impact of soaking–drying cycles on gypsum sand roadbed soil. Transportation Geotechnics, 2, 78–85. doi:10.1016/j.trgeo.2014.11.003.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M.R. and Elliot, R.P., 1985. IIII-PAVE-based response algorithms for design of conventional flexible pavements. In: Transportation Research Record. 1043. Washington, DC: TRB, National Research Council, 50–57.
   Google Scholar
• US Department of Interior, 1980. Earth manual. Water and power resources service. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: US Department of Interior.
   Google Scholar