Spatial pavement roughness from stationary laser scanning

References

• Ahlin, K. and Granlund, N.J., 2002. Relating road roughness and vehicle speeds to human whole body vibration and exposure limits. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 3, 207–216.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM E950/E950M-09, 2008. Standard test method for measuring the longitudinal profile of travelled surfaces with an accelerometer established inertial profiling reference. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. Available from: www.astm.org.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM E1926-08, 2008. Standard practice for computing international roughness index of roads from longitudinal profile measurements. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. Available from: www.astm.org.
   Google Scholar
• Attoh-Okine, N.O., 2001. Grouping pavement condition variables for performance modeling using self-organizing maps. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 16, 112–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogsjö, K. and Rychlik, I., 2009. Vehicle fatigue damage caused by road irregularities. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 32, 391–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, M., et al., 2009. Recognizing patterns in seasonal variation of pavement roughness using minimum message length inference. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 24, 120–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, J.-R., and Chang, K.-T., 2006. Application of 3 D laser scanning on measuring pavement roughness. ASTM Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 34, 83–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernando, E.G. and Walker, R.S., 2013. Impact of changes in profile measurement technology on QA testing of pavement smoothness. Technical Report. Alexandria, VA: National Technical Information Service.
   Google Scholar
• Fernando, E., Walker, R., and Mikhail, M., 2014. Comparative testing of lasers for ride quality measurement on hot-mix asphalt pavements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2457, 19–29.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, P., Lea, J.D., Lee, J.N., and Harvey, J.T., 2013. Comprehensive evaluation of automated pavement condition survey service providers’ technical competence. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 14, 36–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, H. and Zhang, X., 2013. A Markov-based road maintenance optimization model considering user costs. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 28, 451–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T., Sayers, M., and Segel, L., 1980. Calibration of response-type road roughness measuring systems. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, NCHRP Report 228. Available from: http://www.trb.org/Publications/Pages/262.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Herabat, P. and Songchitruksa, P., 2003. A decision support system for flexible pavement treatment selection. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 18, 147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolliffe, I., 2005. Principal component analysis [Online]. Wiley Online Library. doi:10.1002/0470013192.bsa501
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, C.M., Fu, C.R., and Chen, K.Y., 2011. Effects of pavement roughness on rigid pavement stress. Journal of Mechanics, 27, 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurent, J., Savard, Y., and Lefebvre, D., 2014. 3D laser road profiling for the automated survey of road surface conditions and geometry. The 17^th IRF World Meeting & Exhibition, Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers, 30. Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, November.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, C. and Herman, R., 1998. Road profiles, vehicle dynamics, and human judgment of serviceability of roads: spectral frequency domain analysis. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 124, 106–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C. and Herman, R., 1999. Road profile, vehicle dynamics, and ride quality rating. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 125, 123–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loizos, A. and Plati, C., 2008. An alternative approach to pavement roughness evaluation. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 9, 69–78.
   Google Scholar
• Marcondes, J., et al., 1991. Spectral analysis of highway pavement roughness. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 117, 540–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oijer, F. and Edlund, S., 2004. Identification of transient road obstacle distributions and their impact on vehicle durability and driver comfort. Vehicle System Dynamics, 41, 744–753.
   Google Scholar
• Ouyang, W. and Xu, B., 2013. Pavement cracking measurements using 3d laser-scan images. Measurement Science and Technology, 24, 105204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouyang, Y. and Madanat, S., 2004. Optimal scheduling of rehabilitation activities for multiple pavement facilities: exact and approximate solutions. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 38, 347–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ProVAL: Profile viewing and analysis software, version 3.4, 2013. The Transtec, Inc. Available from: www.RoadProfile.com.
   Google Scholar
• Rahim, A.M., Fiegel, G., Ghuzlan, K., and Khumann, D., 2009. Evaluation of international roughness index for asphalt overlays placed over cracked and seated concrete pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 10, 201–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayers, M.W., Gillespie, T.D., and Paterson, W.D.O., 1986. Guidelines for conducting and calibrating road roughness measurements. Technical Report UMTRI-84-13, Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Sayers, M.W., Gillespie, T.D., and Queiroz, A., 1986. The international road roughness experiment. Establishing correlation and a calibration standard for measurements, Technical Report HS-039 586. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Sayers, M.W. and Karamihas, S.M., 1996. Interpretation of road roughness profile data. Alexandria, VA: National Technical Information Service, FHWA-RD-96-101.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, E.M. and Shakarchi, R., 2011. Fourier analysis: an introduction. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steinwolf, A., Giacomin, J., and Staszewski, W., 2002. On the need for bump event correction in vibration test profiles representing road excitations in automobiles. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 216, 279–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, L., 2003. Simulation of pavement roughness and IRI based on power spectral density. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 61, 77–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, Y.J., Wu, J., Wang, Z., and Hu, Z., 2010. Horizontal roadway curvature computation algorithm using vision technology. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 25, 78–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsunokawa, K. and Schofer, J.L., 1994. Trend curve optimal control model for highway pavement maintenance: case study and evaluation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 28, 151–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wand, M., 1997. Data-based choice of histogram bin width. The American Statistician, 51, 59–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zalama, E., et al., 2011. An effective texture mapping approach for 3D models obtained from laser scanner data to building documentation. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 26, 381–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, C. and Elaksher, A., 2012. An unmanned aerial vehicle-based imaging system for 3d measurement of unpaved road surface distresses1. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 27, 118–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar