Sensitivity of flexible pavement design to Michigan’s climatic inputs using pavement ME design

References

• AASHTOWare, 2012. AASHTOWare pavement ME design version 1.0 release notes. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• ARA Inc., 2004. Guide for mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures part 3. Design analysis chapter 3, design of new and reconstructed flexible pavements. Washington DC: National Cooperative Highway Research Program, ERES Consultants Division, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Bordelon, A., Roesler, J., and Hiller, J., 2009. Mechanistic-empirical design concepts for jointed plain concrete pavements in Illinois. Final report, Illinois Center for Transportation, Urbana, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Buch, N. et al., 2009. Characterization of truck traffic in Michigan for the new mechanistic empirical pavement design guide. Lansing, MI: Final report Michigan Department of Transportation, Report No: RC-1537.
   Google Scholar
• Byram, D. et al., 2012. Sensitivity analysis of climatic influence on MEPDG flexible pavement performance predictions, in transportation research board 91st annual meeting. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Caliendo, C., 2011. Local calibration and implementation of the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide for flexible pavement design. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 138 (3), 348–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceylan, H. et al., 2012. Effect of PCC material properties on MEPDG jointed plain concrete pavement (JPCP) performance prediction. In: 10th international conference on concrete pavements: sustainable solutions to global transportation needs. Quebec City: International Society for Concrete Pavements, 236–251.
   Google Scholar
• El-Badawy, S., Bayomy, F., and Awed, A., 2012. Performance of MEPDG dynamic modulus predictive models for asphalt concrete mixtures: local calibration for Idaho. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 24 (11), 1412–1421.10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiller, J.E., 2007. Development of mechanistic-empirical principles for jointed plain concrete pavement fatigue design. ( PhD). Urbana, IL: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Khazanovich, L. et al., 2013. Design and construction guidelines for thermally insulated concrete pavements. Report, Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, MN.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. et al., 2014. Calibration of pavement ME design and mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide performance prediction models for Iowa pavement systems. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 140 (10), 04014052.10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, R., Schwartz, C.W., and Forman, B., 2013. Sensitivity of predicted pavement performance to climate characteristics, in 2013 airfield and highway pavement conference. Los Angeles, CA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• MDOT, 2009. Hot mix asphalt (HMA) selection guidelines. Lansing, MI: Michigan Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• MDOT, 2012. Standard specifications for construction. Lansing, MI: Michigan Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• NCAT, 1993. SHRP binder grading system based on pavement design temperatures. Asphalt Technology News, 5 (2), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Orobio, A. and Zaniewski, J.P., 2013. Sensitivity of the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide to traffic inputs: a space-filling approach. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 14 (3), 735–746.10.1080/14680629.2013.816248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha, J. et al., 2012. Evaluation of the effects of Canadian climate conditions on the MEPDG predictions for flexible pavement performance. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 15 (5), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, C.W. et al., 2011. Sensitivity evaluation of MEPDG performance prediction. Washington DC: Final report to National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Report No: 1–47.
   Google Scholar
• Tarefder, R. and Rodriguez-Ruiz, J., 2013. Local calibration of MEPDG for flexible pavements in New Mexico. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 139 (10), 981–991.10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Z., Yang, X., and Zhang, Z., 2012. Evaluation of MEPDG flexible pavement design using pavement management system data: Louisiana experience. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 14 (7), 674–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You, Z. et al., 2015. Improvement of Michigan climatic files in pavement ME design. Lansing, MI: Final Report to Michigan Department of Transportation, Report No: RC-1626.
   Google Scholar
• Zaghloul, S. et al., 2006. Investigations of environmental and traffic impacts on “mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide” predictions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1967 (1), 148–159.
   Google Scholar