State of the art: interface shear resistance of asphalt surface layers

References

• Abd El Halim, A.O., 2007. Design, development, and validation of an advanced in-situ shear stiffness test facility for asphalt concrete pavements, Final Report for Highway IDEA Project 55; Transportation Research Board, December.
   Google Scholar
• Ali Shafabakhsh, G. and Akbari, A., 2013. Numerical study of airplane wheel characteristics on the runway rigid pavement failure. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, 72, 348–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Qadi, I.L. and Wang, H., 2011. Prediction of tire pavement contact stress and analysis of asphalt pavement response: a decoupled approach. In: Proceedings asphalt pavement technology. 27–30 March Tampa, FL: Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 289–315.
   Google Scholar
• Bae, A., et al., 2010. Effects of temperature on interface shear strength of emulsified tack coat and its relationship to rheological properties. Transport Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2180, 102–109.10.3141/2180-12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekheet, W., Adb El Halim, A.O., and Easa, S., 2007. In-situ shear stiffness of asphalt concrete mixtures. In: Proceedings advanced characterisation of pavement and soil engineering materials. 20–22 June Athens, Greece: Taylor and Francis, 853–863.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, M.S. and Woods, M.E., 2004. Field tack coat evaluator (ATACKer), Final Report, Report No. FHWA/MS-DOT-RD-04-168, Mississippi Transportation Research Centre, 15 December.
   Google Scholar
• Buonsanti, M. and Leonardi, G., 2012. A finite element model to evaluate airport flexible pavement response under impact. Journal of Applied Mechanics and Materials, 138–139, 257–262.
   Google Scholar
• Canestrari, F., et al., 2005. Advanced testing and characterization of interlayer shear resistance. Transport Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1929, 69–78.10.3141/1929-09
   Google Scholar
• Canestrari, F., et al., 2013. Mechanical testing of interlayer bonding in asphalt pavements. In: M.N. Partl, H.U. Bahia, F. Canestrari, C. de la Roche, H. Di Benedetto, H. Piber, and D. Sybilski, eds. Advances in interlaboratory testing and evaluation of bituminous materials, RILEM state of the art reports. vol 9. Netherlands, Amsterdam: Springer, pp. 303–360.
   Google Scholar
• Canestrari, F. and Santagata, E., 2005. Temperature effect on the shear behaviour of tack coat emulsions used in flexible pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 6 (1), 39–46. 10.1080/10298430500068720
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J.-S., Chang, M.K., and Lin, K.Y., 2005. Influence of coarse aggregate shape on the strength of asphalt concrete mixtures. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 6, 1062–1075.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, J.-S. and Huang, C.-C., 2010. Effect of surface characteristics on bonding properties of bituminous tack coats. Transport Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2180, 142–149.10.3141/2180-16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collop, A.C., et al., 2009. Shear bond strength between asphalt layers for laboratory prepared samples and field cores. Construction and Building Materials, 23, 2251–2258.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.11.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collop, A.C., Thom, N.H., and Sangiorgi, C., 2003. Assessment of bond condition using the Leutner shear test. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Transport, 156 (TR4), 211–217.
   Google Scholar
• Dai, Q. and You, Z., 2007. Prediction of creep stiffness of asphalt mixture with micromechanical finite-element and discrete-element models. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 133 (2), 163–173.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2007)133:2(163)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Andrea, A., Russo, S., and Tozzo, C., 2013. Interlayer shear testing under combined stress conditions. Advanced Materials Research, 723, 381–388.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.723
   Google Scholar
• D’Andrea, A., et al., 2013. Interface roughness parameters and shear strength. Modern Applied Science, 7 (10), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• De Beer, M., Fisher, C., and Jooste, F.J., 2002. Evaluation of non-uniform tyre contact stresses on thin asphalt pavements, 9th international conference on asphalt pavements. 17–22 August Copenhagen, Denmark. International Society of Asphalt Pavements.
   Google Scholar
• De Beer, M., et al., 2011. Towards using tire-road contact in pavement design and analysis, September 2011 meeting of the tire society. South Africa: Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Diakhate, M., et al., 2011. Experimental investigation of tack coat fatigue performance: towards an improved lifetime assessment of pavement structure interfaces. Construction and Building Materials, 25, 3–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diakhate, M., et al., 2007. Comparison of direct shear and torque tests for determing viscoelastic shear behavior of tack coats. In: Proceedings advanced characterisation of pavement and soil engineering materials, 20–22 June Athens, Greece: Taylor and Francis, 281–290.
   Google Scholar
• Diakhate, M., et al., 2008. Interface fatigue cracking in multilayerd pavements: experimental analysis. In: Proceedings sixth RILEM international conference on cracking in pavements, 16–19 June Chicago, IL: Taylor and Francis, 649–659.
   Google Scholar
• Diakhate, M., et al., 2006. Shear fatigue behaviour of tack coats. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 7 (2), 201–222.10.1080/14680629.2006.9690033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DoC., 1978. Repair and maintenance of slippage cracking of bituminous aerodrome pavements. Commonwealth of Australia: Department of Construction.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, R.E., Taylor, R.L., and Brekke, T.L.A., 1968. Model for the mechanics of jointed rock. Journal of Soil Mechanics, 94, 637–658.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, S.N., 2000. Design development and validation of the in-situ shear stiffness test (InSiSST) facility for asphalt concrete. Thesis (Master of Engineering). Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, S.,  et al., 2002. Rapid in situ shear testing of asphalt pavements for runway construction quality control and assurance. In: Proceedings 2002 FAA airport technology transfer conference. USA: Atlantic City.
   Google Scholar
• Hachiya, Y. and Sato, K., 1997. Effect of tack coat in bonding characteristics at interface between asphalt concrete layers. In: Proceedings eight international conference on asphalt pavements, vol.1 10–14 August, Seattle, WA: International Society of Asphalt Pavements, 349–362.
   Google Scholar
• Hakimzadeh, S., et al., 2012. Development of fracture energy based Interface bond test for asphalt concrete. In: Road materials and pavement design, 1–4 April, vol 13, suppl. 1, Austin, TX. 87th Association of Asphalt Pavement Technologists, Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Holleran, G., McCaffrey, L., and Wilson, D., 2008. The effect of particle shape and angularity on SMA mix characterisation. In: Proceedings 23rd ARRB conference, 22–23 July Australian Road Research Board, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, ARRB Transport Research.
   Google Scholar
• Horak, E., et al., 2009. Mechanistic modelling of potential interlayer slip at base and sub-base level. In: Proceedings eighth international conference on the bearing capacity of roads, railways and airfields, 29 June–2 July Urbana-Champaign, 543–550.
   Google Scholar
• Horak, E., Maina, J., and Emery, S., 2009. A case study: quantification and modeling of asphalt overlay delamination on an airport pavement. In: Proceedings eight international conference on the bearing capacity of roads, railways and airfields, 29 June–2 July Urbana-Champaign, 1475–1483.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, X. and Walubita, M., 2011. Effects of layer interfacial bonding conditions on the mechanistic responses in asphalt pavements. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 137 (1), 28–36.10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondo, T.,  et al., 2003. Movement characteristics of aggregate in asphalt mixtures during the wheel tracking test. Journal of the Japan Petroleum Institute, 46 (3), 172–180.10.1627/jpi.46.172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruntcheva, M.R., Collop, A.C., and Thom, N.H., 2006. Effect of bond condition on flexible pavement performance. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 18 (3), 467–471.10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:3(467)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruntcheva, M.R., Collop, A.C., and Thom, N.H., 2005. Properties of asphalt concrete layer interfaces. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 131 (11), 880–888.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2005)131:11(880)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lysenko, J.E., 2006. Development of shear testing of a bond coat emulsion. Lyon: Proceedings CME Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Maina, J.W., Dennerman, M., and De Beer, M., 2008. Introduction of new road pavement response modelling software by means of benchmarking. In: Proceedings 27th annual South African transportation conference, 7–11 July Pretoria, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Maina, J.W. and Matsui, K., 2004. Development of software for elastic analysis of pavement structure due to vertical and horizontal surface loadings. In: Proceedings 83rd meeting of the transport research board, 11–15 January Washington, DC: Transport Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Maina, J.W., Ozawa, Y., and Matsui, K., 2012. Linear elastic analysis of pavement structure under non-circular loading. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 13 (3), 403–421.10.1080/14680629.2012.705419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, M.S., Chehab, G.R., and Solaimanian, M., 2012. Investigation of ultra-rapid setting emulsion for tack coat application. Transport Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2293, 80–88.10.3141/2293-10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejia, D., et al., 2008. A work plan toward evaluation of technologies to assess presence and extent of delamination of HMA airfield pavements, research project 06–04, June. El Paso, TX: Centre of Transportation Infrastructure Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammad, L.N., et al., 2010. Effects of pavement surface type and sample preparation method on tack coat interface shear strength. Transport Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2180, 93–101.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammad, L.N., et al., 2009. Interface shear strength characterisation of emulsified tack coats. In: Proceedings asphalt pavement technology, 15–18 March Minneapolis, MN: Association of Asphalt Pavement Technologists, 78, 250–277.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammad, L.N., Hassan, M., and Patel, N., 2011. Effects of shear bond characteristics of tack coats on pavement performance at the interface. Transport Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2209, 1–8.10.3141/2209-01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammad, L.N., Rabiq, M.A., and Huang, B., 2002. Influence of asphalt tack coat materials on interface shear strength. Transport Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1789, 56–65.10.3141/1789-06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mrawira, D. and Damude, D.J., 1999. Revisiting the effectiveness of tack coats in HMA overlays: the shear strength of tack coats in young overlays. In: Proceedings of the 44th annual conference of the canadian technical asphalt association, 14–17 November Quebec, New Brunswick, Canada: Polyscience, 115–129.
   Google Scholar
• Muench, S.T. and Moomaw Tim, 2008. De-bonding of hot mix asphalt pavement in Washington state: an initial investigation, Technical Report TNW 2008–2010. Seatle, WA: Transportation Northwest.
   Google Scholar
• Oeser, M., et al., 2008. Studies on creep and recovery of rheological bodies based upon conventional and formulations and their application on asphalt mixture. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 9 (5), 373–386.10.1080/10298430802068923
   Google Scholar
• Pasindu, H.R., Fwa, T.F., and Ong, G.P., 2011. Computation of aircraft braking distances. Transport Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2214, 126–135.10.3141/2214-16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petit, C., et al., 2012. Experimental study on shear fatigue behaviour and stiffness performance of warm mix asphalt by adding synthetic wax. Construction and Building Materials, 34, 537–544.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raab, C., and Partl, M.N., 2004. Interlayer hear performance: experience with different pavement structures. In: Proceedings 3rd Eurasphalt & Eurobitume congress, Vol. 1 12–14 May Vienna, Austria. 535–545.
   Google Scholar
• Raab, C., Partl, M.N. and Abd El Halim, A.O., 2010. Effect of gap width on interlayer shear bond results. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 3 (2), 79–85.
   Google Scholar
• Romanoschi, S.A. and Metcalf, J.B., 2002. The characterization of pavement layer interfaces. In: Proceedings 9th international conference on asphalt pavements, healing and bonding session, 17–22 August Copenhagen, Denmark: International Society for Asphalt Pavements.
   Google Scholar
• Sangiorgi, C., Collop, A.C., and Thom, N.H., 2002. Laboratory assessment of bond condition using the Leutner shear test. In: Proceedings 3rd international conference bituminous mixtures and pavements, 21–22 November Thessaloniki, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Santagata, F.A., et al., 2009. Statistical investigation of two different interlayer shear test methods. Materials and Structures, 42, 705–714.10.1617/s11527-008-9414-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santagata, F.A., et al., 2008. Layer characteristics affecting interlayer shear resistance in flexible pavements. In: Proceedings asphalt pavement technology, 15–18 March Minneapolis, MN: Association of Asphalt Pavement Technologists, 77, 221–256.
   Google Scholar
• Sholar, G.A., et al., 2002. Preliminary investigation of a test method to evaluate bond strength of bituminous tack coats, Gainesville, FL: Department of Transport, Research Report FL/DOT/SMO/02-459.
   Google Scholar
• Su, K., et al., 2008. Analysis of shear stresses in asphalt pavements under actual measured tire – pavement contact pressure. In: Proceedings 6th international conference on road and airfield pavement technology, 20–23 July Sapporo, Japan: Pavement Engineering Society (Singapore), 11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Sutanto, M.H., et al., 2007. Laboratory measurement of shear interface strength beneath a thin asphalt layer. In: Proceedings advanced characterisation of pavement and soil engineering materials, 20–22 June Athens, Greece: Taylor and Francis, 1327–1336.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrer, A.R. and Wagh, V., 1994. Factors Influencing mix setting characteristics and tests to predict mix setting characteristics, SHRP-A/UWP-91-508. Washington, DC: Strategic Highway Research Program.
   Google Scholar
• Tashman, L., et al., 2008. Evaluation of construction practices that influence the bond strength at the interface between pavement layers. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 22 (3), 154–161.10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2008)22:3(154)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tayebali, A.A., et al., 2004, A mechanistic approach to evaluate contribution of prime and tack coat in composite asphalt pavements, Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University Research Report 2001–2004, 25 June.
   Google Scholar
• Tozzo, C.,  et al., 2014. Fatigue investigation of the interface shear performance in asphalt pavement. Modern Applied Science, 8 (2), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Tozzo, C., Fiore, N., and D’Andrea, A., 2014. Dynamic shear tests for the evaluation of the effect of the normal load on the interface fatigue resistance. Construction and Building Materials, 61, 200–205.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran, N., Willis, R., and Julian, G., 2011, Refinement of the bond strength procedure and investigation of a specification. Auburn, AL: National Centre for Asphalt Technology, Report No. 12–04, October.
   Google Scholar
• TRB, 2012. Optimization of Tack Coat for HMA Placement, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Report 712. Washington, DC: Transport Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• TRB, 2013. Nondestructive Testing to Identify Delaminations between HMA Layers, Vol.1–5, Strategic Highway Research Board Program, Report S2–R06D-RR-1. Washington, DC: Transport Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Tsubokawa, Y., et al., 2007. Study on infrared thermographic inspection of de-bonded layer of asphalt flexible pavement. In: Proceedings FAA worldwide airport technology transfer conference, 16–18 April Atlantic City, NJ: Federal Aviation Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Uzan, J., Livneh, M., and Eshed, Y., 1978. Investigation of adhesion properties between asphaltic-concrete layers. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 47, 495–521.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H., Al-Qadi, I.L., and Stanciulescu, I., 2012. Simulation of tyre-pavement interaction for predicting contract stress at static and various rolling conditions. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 13 (4), 310–321.10.1080/10298436.2011.565767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, R.C., Zhang, J., and Moore, J., 2005. Evaluation of bond strength between pavement layers, Auburn, AL: National Centre for Asphalt Technology, Report No. 05–08, December.
   Google Scholar
• White, G., 2015. Adequacy of runway asphalt overlay interface construction. In: Proceedings 16th AAPA international flexible pavement conference, 13–16 September Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia: Australian Asphalt Pavement Association.
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, P.J., et al., 2006. Flexible pavement responses to different loading amplitudes considering layer interface conditions and lateral shear forces. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 7 (1), 73–86.10.1080/10298430500516074
   Google Scholar