341
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Developing a framework for diagnosis of shear distress in asphalt surfaces

, , &
Pages 1039-1051 | Received 02 Jan 2016, Accepted 02 Jan 2016, Published online: 17 Feb 2016

References

  • Airbus, 2014. Toulouse, France. Available from: http://www.airbus.com/support/maintenance-engineering/technical-data/aircraft-characteristics/ [Accessed 27 January 2014].
  • Airey, G.D., 2003. State of the art report on ageing test methods for bituminous pavement materials. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 4 (3), 165–176.10.1080/1029843042000198568
  • Al-Qadi, I.L. and Wang, H., 2011. Prediction of tire pavement contact stress and analysis of asphalt pavement response: a decoupled approach. In: Proceedings asphalt pavement technology, 27–30 March. Tampa, FL, USA: Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 289–315.
  • Al-Qadi, I.L., et al., 2009. Creep behavior of hot-mix asphalt due to heavy vehicular tire loading. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 135 (11), 1265–1273.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2009)135:11(1265)
  • Bae, A., et al., 2010. Effects of temperature on interface shear strength of emulsified tack coats and its relationship to rheological properties. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2180, 102–109.10.3141/2180-12
  • Baumgardner, G. and D’Angelo, J.A., 2012. Evaluation of new dynamic shear rheometer testing geometry for performance testing of crumb rubber-modified binder. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2293, 73–79.10.3141/2293-09
  • Beecroft, A., Denneman, E., and Petho, L., 2015. Analysis of the temperature profile for an asphalt pavement over one-year in Brisbane. In: AAPA international flexible pavements conference, 13–16 September. Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia: Australian Asphalt Pavement Association.
  • Bianchetto, H., et al., 2007. Effect of calcareous fillers on bituminous mix aging. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1998, 140–148.10.3141/1998-17
  • Boeing, 2013. Seattle, WA. Available from: http://www.boeing.com/boeing/commercial/airports/plan_manuals.page [Accessed 27 January 2014].
  • Bognacki, C.J., Frisvold, A., and Bennert, T., 2007, Investigation into asphalt pavement slippage failures on Runway 04R-22L Newark international airport. In: Proceedings 2007 FAA worldwide airport technology transfer conference, 16–18 April. Galloway, NJ, USA: Federal Aviation Administration.
  • Canestrari, F., et al., 2005. Advanced testing and characterization of interlayer shear resistance. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1929, 69–78.10.3141/1929-09
  • Celaya, M., and Nazarian, S., 2014. Field evaluation of NDT devices for delamination detection of HMA airport pavements. Proceedings FAA worldwide airport technology transfer conference, 5–7 August. Galloway, NJ: Federal Aviation Administration.
  • Chen, J.-S., Chang, M.K., and Lin, K.Y., 2005. Influence of coarse aggregate shape on the strength of asphalt concrete mixtures. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 6, 1062–1075.
  • Chen, J.-S., Wong, S.Y., and Lin, K.Y., 2005. Quantification of movements of flat and elongated particles in hot mix asphalt subject to wheel load test. Materials and Structures, 38 (277), 395–402.10.1617/14151
  • Coenen, A.R., et al., 2012. Aggregate structure characterisation of asphalt mixtures using two-dimensional image analysis. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 13 (3), 433–454.10.1080/14680629.2012.711923
  • Collop, A.C., et al., 2009. Shear bond strength between asphalt layers for laboratory prepared samples and field cores. Construction and Building Materials, 23, 2251–2258.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.11.017
  • Crawford, C., 1986. Tender Mixes, Report QIP 108. Riverdale MD, USA: National Asphalt Pavement Association.
  • D’Angelo, J., et al., 2007. Revision of the superpave high temperature binder specification: the multiple stress creep recovery test. Proceedings asphalt paving technology, 11–14 March. San Antonio, TX, USA: Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 76, 123–162.
  • De Beer, M., Fisher, C., and Jooste, F.J., 2002, Evaluation of non-uniform tyre contact stresses on thin asphalt pavements. In: 9th International conference on asphalt pavements, 17–22 August. Copenhagen, Denmark: International Society of Asphalt Pavements.
  • De Beer, M., et al., 2011. Towards using tire-road contact in pavement design and analysis. September 2011 meeting of the tire society. Pretoria, South Africa.
  • Delaporte, B., et al., 2007, Filler and binder influence on the linear viscoelastic behavior of mastics. In: Proceedings advanced characterisation of pavement and soil engineering materials, 20–22 June, Athens, Greece: Taylor and Francis, 3–13.
  • Delgadillo, R., Bahia, H.U., and Lakes, R., 2012. A nonlinear constitutive relationship for asphalt binders. Materials and Structures, 45, 457–473.10.1617/s11527-011-9777-y
  • Denneman, E., 2007. The application of locally developed pavement temperature prediction algorithms in performance grade (PG) binder selection. In: Proceedings 26th Southern African transport conference, 9–13 July, Pretoria, South Africa, 257–266.
  • Diakhate, M., et al., 2006. Shear fatigue behaviour of tack coats in pavements. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 7 (2), 201–222.10.1080/14680629.2006.9690033
  • Diakhate, M., et al., 2007. Comparison of direct shear and torque tests for determining viscoelastic shear behavior of tack coats. In: Proceedings advanced characterisation of pavement and soil engineering materials, 20–22 June. Athens, Greece: Taylor and Francis, 281–290.
  • Elnasri, M., Airey, G., and Thom, N., 2013. Experimental investigation of bitumen mastics under shear creep and creep-recovery testing. In: Proceedings T&DI airfield and highway pavement speciality conference, 9–12 June. Los Angeles, CA, USA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 921–932.
  • Emery, S., 2005. Asphalt on Australian airports. Proceedings AAPA pavements industry conference, 18–21 September. Surfers Paradise, Queensland, Australia: Australian Asphalt Pavements Association.
  • Faheem, A.F. and Bahia, H.U., 2010. Modelling of asphalt mastic in terms of filler-bitumen interaction. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 11, 281–303.10.1080/14680629.2010.9690335
  • Farcas, F.A., 2012. Evaluation of asphalt field cores with simple performance tester and X-ray computer tomography. Licentiate Thesis. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • FHWA, 2011. The multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) procedure, technical brief FHWA-HIF-11-038, federal highways administration, USA April. Available from: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/materials/pubs/hif11038/hif11038.pdf [Accessed 8 February 2015].
  • Goodman, S., et al., 2002. Rapid in situ shear testing of asphalt pavements for runway construction quality control and assurance. Proceedings 2002 FAA airport technology transfer conference, May. Galloway, NJ, USA.
  • Gray, C., Yeaman, J., and Tighe, S., 2015. Using innovative in situ measuring tools to better understand asphalt performance. AAPA international flexible pavements conference, 13–16 September. Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia: Australian Asphalt Pavement Association.
  • Hachiya, Y. and Sato, K., 1997. Effect of tack coat in bonding characteristics at interface between asphalt concrete layers. Proceedings eight international conference on asphalt pavements, 10–14 August. Seattle, WA, USA: International Society of Asphalt Pavements, 1, 349–362.
  • Harnsberger, P.M., et al., 2011. Comparative field performance using multiple crude oil sources. Proceedings transport research board annual meeting, 23–27 January. Washington, DC, USA.
  • Holleran, G., McCaffrey, L., and Wilson, D., 2008. The effect of particle shape and angularity on SMA mix characterisation. Proceedings 23rd ARRB conference, 22–23 July. Adelaide, South Australia, Australia: ARRB Transport Research.
  • Holleran, G., et al., 2014. Bitumen in New Zealand – performance based asphalt binder specification. Proceedings NZTA/NZIHT 15th annual conference, 2–4 November. Queenstown, New Zealand: New Zealand Transit Authority.
  • Horak, E., et al., 2009a. Mechanistic modelling of potential interlayer slip at base and sub-base level. Proceedings eighth international conference on the bearing capacity of roads, railways and airfields, 29 June–2 July. Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA, 543–550.
  • Horak, E., Maina, J., and Emery, S. 2009b. A case study: quantification and modeling of asphalt overlay delamination on an airport pavement. Proceedings eight international conference on the bearing capacity of roads, railways and airfields, 29 June–2 July. Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA, 1475–1483.
  • Jiménez, F.P., Recasens, R.M., and Martínez, A., 2008. Effect of filler nature and content on the behaviour of bituminous mastics. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 9, 417–431.10.1080/14680629.2008.9690177
  • Kandhal, P.S., Motter, J.B., and Khatri, M.A., 1991. Evaluation of particle shape and texture: manufactured versus natural sands. NCAT Report 91–03. Auburn, AL, USA: National Centre for Asphalt Technology, January.
  • Kandhal, P.S., Khatri, M.A., and Motter, J.B., 1992. Evaluation of particle shape and texture of mineral aggregates and their blends. NCAT Report 92-4. Auburn, AL, USA: National Centre for Asphalt Technology, May.
  • Kondo, T., et al., 2003. Movement characteristics of aggregates in asphalt mixtures during the wheel tracking test. Journal of the Japan Petroleum Institute, 46 (3), 172–180.10.1627/jpi.46.172
  • Kutay, M.E., et al., 2010. Three-dimensional image processing methods to identify and characterise aggregates in compacted asphalt mixtures. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 11 (6), 511–528.10.1080/10298431003749725
  • Liao, M.-C., Airey, G., and Chen, J.-S., 2013. Mechanical properties of filler-asphalt mastics. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 6 (5), 576–581.
  • Little, D.N. and Petersen, J.C., 2005. Unique effects of hydrated lime filler on the performance-related properties of asphalt cements: physical and chemical interactions revisited. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 17 (2), 207–218.10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:2(207)
  • Lysenko, J.E., 2006. Development of shear testing of a bond coat emulsion. Lyon, France: Proceedings CME Congress.
  • Maina, J.W., Ozawa, Y., and Matsui, K., 2012. Linear elastic analysis of pavement structure under non-circular loading. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 13 (3), 403–421.10.1080/14680629.2012.705419
  • Masad, E. and Button, J.W., 2000. Unified imaging approach for measuring aggregate angularity and texture. Computer-aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 15, 273–280.10.1111/mice.2000.15.issue-4
  • Masad, E., et al., 1998. Aggregate orientation and segregation in asphalt concrete. Proceedings Application of Geotechnical Principles in Pavement Engineering, Geotechnical Special Publication Number 85, 69–81.
  • Masad, E., et al., 1999a. Internal structure characterization of asphalt concrete using image analysis. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 13 (2), 88–95.10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1999)13:2(88)
  • Masad, E., et al., 1999b. Quantifying laboratory compaction effects on the internal structure of asphalt concrete. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1681, 179–185.10.3141/1681-21
  • Matsuno, S., and Nishizawa, T., 1992. Mechanism of longitudinal surface cracking in asphalt pavement. 7th international conference on asphalt pavements, The University of Nottingham, UK, 2, 277–291.
  • Mejia, D., et al., 2008. A work plan toward evaluation of technologies to assess presence and extent of delamination of HMA airfield pavements, Research Project 06–04. El Paso, TX, USA: Centre of Transportation Infrastructure Systems, June.
  • Mohammad, L.N., et al., 2009. Interface shear strength characterisation of emulsified tack coats. Proceedings asphalt pavement technology, 15–18 March. Minneapolis, MN, USA: Association of Asphalt Pavement Technologists, 78, 250–277.
  • Mohammad, L.N., et al, 2010. Effects of pavement surface type and sample preparation method on tack coat interface shear strength. Transport Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2180, 93–101.
  • Mohammad, L.N., Hassan, M., and Patel, N., 2011. Effects of shear bond characteristics of tack coats on pavement performance at the interface. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2209, 1–8.10.3141/2209-01
  • Monismith, C.L., et al., 2000. Asphalt mix studies – San Francisco international airport. Proceedings of the 26th air transportation conference, 19–21 June. San Francisco, CA, USA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 113–124.
  • Motamed, A. and Bahia, H.U., 2011. Influence of test geometry, temperature, stress level, and loading duration on binder properties measured using DSR. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 23, 1422–1432.10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000321
  • Muraya, P.M., Molenaar, A.A.A., and van de Ven, M.F.C., 2009. Contribution of asphalt mix components to permanent deformation resistance. Proceedings eight international conference on the bearing capacity of roads, railways and airfields, 29 June–2 July, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA, 259–268.
  • Oeser, M., et al., 2008. Studies on creep and recovery of rheological bodies based upon conventional and fractional formulations and their application on asphalt mixture. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 9 (5), 373–386.10.1080/10298430802068923
  • Oliver, J.W.H., 2009. Changes in the chemical composition of Australian bitumens. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 10 (3), 569–586.10.1080/14680629.2009.9690214
  • Qiu, H., et al., 2013. Influence of filler-bitumen ratio on performance of modified asphalt mortar by additive. Journal of Modern Transportation, 21 (1), 40–46.10.1007/s40534-013-0002-2
  • Sangiorgi, C., Collop, A.C., and Thom, N.H., 2002. Laboratory assessment of bond condition using the Leutner shear test. Proceedings 3rd international conference bituminous mixtures and pavements, 21–22 November. Thessaloniki, Greece.
  • Santagata, F.A., et al., 2008. Layer characteristics affecting interlayer shear resistance in flexible pavements. Proceedings asphalt pavement technology, 15–18 March. Minneapolis, MN, USA: Association of Asphalt Pavement Technologists, 77, 221–256.
  • Shell, S., 2015. The shell bitumen handbook, 6th ed. Italy: ICE Publishing.
  • Santagata, E., et al., 2013. Evaluation of the anti-rutting potential of polymer-modified binders by means of creep-recovery shear tests. Materials and Structures, 46, 1673–1682.10.1617/s11527-012-0006-0
  • Sholar, G.A., et al., 2002. Preliminary investigation of a test method to evaluate bond strength of bituminous tack coats. Report FL/DOT/SMO/02-459, Florida Department of Transport, October.
  • Sousa, J.B., Solaimanian, M., and Weissman, S.L., 1994. Development and use of the repeated shear test (Constant height): an optional superpave mix design tool, Report SHRP-A-698. Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research Council, August.
  • Tarrer, A.R. and Wagh, V., 1994. Factors influencing mix setting characteristics and tests to predict mix setting characteristics, SHRP-A/UWP-91-508. Washington DC, USA: Strategic Highway Research Program.
  • Tashman, L., et al., 2005. A microstructure-based viscoplastic model for asphalt concrete. International Journal of Plasticity, 21, 1659–1685.10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.11.008
  • Tashman, L., Wang, L., and Thyagarajan, S., 2007. Microstructure characterization for modeling HMA behaviour using imaging technology. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 8, 207–238.10.1080/14680629.2007.9690073
  • Tashman, L., et al., 2008. Evaluation of construction practices that influence the bond strength at the interface between pavement layers. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 22 (3), 154–161.10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2008)22:3(154)
  • Tayebali, A.A., et al., 2004. A mechanistic approach to evaluate contribution of prime and tack coat in composite asphalt pavements, Research Report 2001–04, North Carolina State University, 25 June.
  • Tran, N., Willis, R., and Julian, G., 2011, Refinement of the bond strength procedure and investigation of a specification, Report No. 12-04, National Centre for Asphalt Technology, October.
  • TRB, 2012. Optimization of tack coat for HMA placement, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Report 712. Washington, DC, USA: Transportation Research Board.
  • TRB, 2013, Nondestructive testing to identify delaminations between HMA Layers, vols. 1–5, Washington, DC: Strategic Highway Research Board Program, Transportation Research Board, USA Report S2-R06D-RR-1.
  • Tsubokawa, Y., et al., 2007. Study on infrared thermographic inspection of de-bonded layer of asphalt flexible pavement. Proceedings FAA worldwide airport technology transfer conference, 16–18 April. Galloway, NJ, USA: Federal Aviation Administration.
  • Uzan, J., Livneh, M., and Eshed, Y., 1978. Investigation of adhesion properties between asphaltic-concrete layers. Journal of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 47, 495–521.
  • Vallerga, B.A., Jew, A., and Nokes, W.A., 2000. Case study of an innovative high stability asphalt mix for heavy aircraft wheel loads. Proceedings of the 26th air transportation conference, 19–21 June. San Francisco, CA, USA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 334–345.
  • Wang, H., et al., 2011. Effect of mineral filler characteristics on asphalt mastic and mixture rutting potential. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2208, 33–39.10.3141/2208-05
  • Wang, H., Al-Qadi, I.L., and Stanciulescu, I., 2012. Simulation of tyre–pavement interaction for predicting contact stresses at static and various rolling conditions. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 13 (4), 310–321.10.1080/10298436.2011.565767
  • West, R.C., Zhang, J., and Moore, J., 2005. Evaluation of bond strength between pavement layers, Report No. 05-08, National Centre for Asphalt Technology, December.
  • White, G., 2014a. Asphalt surface slippages at Melbourne International Airport. Proceedings 26th ARRB conference, 19–22 October. Sydney, Australia: ARRB Transport Research.
  • White, G., 2014b. Cyclic shear deformation at Melbourne Airport. Proceedings 2014 FAA world wide technology transfer conference, 5–7 August. Atlantic City, NJ, USA: Federal Aviation Administration.
  • White, G., 2015a. ACN-PCN system and higher sircraft tyre pressures and wheel loads: the impacts for airports into the future. Australian airports association national conference, 12–16 October. Hobart, Tasmania, Australia: Australian Airports Association.
  • White, G., 2015b. Adequacy of runway asphalt overlay interface construction. AAPA international flexible pavements conference, 13-16 September. Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia: Australian Asphalt Pavement Association.
  • White, G., 2015c. Effect of aircraft traffic on the structure and response of asphalt. Transportation Geotechnics, 2, 56–64.10.1016/j.trgeo.2014.10.001
  • White, G., 2015d. Systematic diagnosis of factors leading to cyclic shear creep of airport asphalt surfaces. Dissertation (PhD). School of Science and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia, August.
  • White, G., 2015e. Asphalt tenderness in an Australian runway overlay. Transportation Geotechnics. doi:10.1016/j.trgeo.2015.08.001
  • White, G., 2015f. Shear creep response of an airport asphalt mastic. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. doi 10.1080/10298436.2015.1095914
  • White, G., 2015g, State of the art: interface shear resistance of asphalt surface layers. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. doi 10.1080/10298436.2015.1126270
  • White, G. and Embleton, K., 2015. Next generation binder for airport asphalt. AAPA international flexible pavements conference, 13–16 September. Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia: Australian Asphalt Pavement Association.
  • White, G. and Gabrawy, T., 2016. Airport asphalt surface interface shear resistance: factors affecting and advanced characterisation. International Journal of Pavement Engineering and Asphalt Technology, 17 (1).
  • Wu, J., Lepercq, E., and Airey, G.D., 2007. Aging bitumen in bulk versus the aging of bitumen in an asphalt mixture. Proceedings advanced characterisation of pavement and soil engineering materials, 20–22 June. Athens, Greece: Taylor and Francis, 1631–1640.
  • Yoo, P.J., et al., 2006. Flexible pavement responses to different loading amplitudes considering layer interface condition and lateral shear forces. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 7 (1), 73–86.10.1080/10298430500516074
  • Zelelew, H.M. and Papagiannakis, A.T., 2012. Interpreting asphalt concrete creep behaviour through non-Newtonian mastic rheology. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 13 (2), 266–278.10.1080/14680629.2012.670552
  • Zhao, Y., et al., 2015. Accurate determination of near-surface responses of asphalt pavements. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 16 (1), 186–199.10.1080/14680629.2014.979221
  • Ziari, H. and Divandari, H., 2013. Presenting asphalt mixtures flow number prediction model using gyratory compaction. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 11 (2), 125–133.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.