Error sensitivity of the connected vehicle approach to pavement performance evaluations

References

• Agresti, A. and Finlay, B., 2009. Statistical methods for the social sciences. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Ahlin, K. and Granlund, N.J., 2002. Relating road roughness and vehicle speeds to human whole body vibration and exposure limits. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 3 (4), 207–216.10.1080/10298430210001701
   Google Scholar
• Ayenu-Prah, A.Y. and Attoh-Okine, N.O., 2009. Comparative study of Hilbert-Huang transform, Fourier transform and wavelet transform in pavement profile analysis. Vehicle System Dynamics, 47 (4), 437–456.10.1080/00423110802167466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridgelall, R., 2014a. Connected vehicle approach for pavement roughness evaluation. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 20 (1), 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridgelall, R., 2014b. Inertial sensor sample rate selection for ride quality measures. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 21 (2), 1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridgelall, R., 2014c. A participatory sensing approach to characterize ride quality. In: J.P. Lynch, K.-W. Wang, and H. Sohn, eds. Proceedings of SPIE 9061, sensors and smart structures technologies for civil, mechanical, and aerospace systems, 8 March 2014 San Diego. Bellingham: International Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE).
   Google Scholar
• Bridgelall, R., 2015. Precision bounds of pavement distress localization with connected vehicle sensors. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 21 (1), 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridgelall, R., et al., 2016. Precision enhancement of pavement roughness localization with connected vehicles. Measurement Science and Technology, 27 (2), 025012.10.1088/0957-0233/27/2/025012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, M., et al., 2013. Identifying road defect information from smartphones. Road & Transport Research, 22 (1), 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawkins, J., et al., 2011. Investigation of pavement maintenance applications of intellidrive. Pooled Fund Study. Charlottesville: University of Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• Du, Y., et al., 2014. Measurement of international roughness index by using z-axis accelerometers and GPS. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, S., et al., 2014. Measurement of pavement roughness using android-based smartphone application. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2457, 30–38.10.3141/2457-04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karamihas, S.M., 2015. Measuring, characterizing, and reporting pavement roughness of low-speed and urban roads. Research in Progress. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies. Available from: http://apps.trb.org/cmsfeed/TRBNetProjectDisplay.asp?ProjectID=3404 [Accessed 12 October 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Lak, M.A., Degrande, G., and Lombaert, G., 2011. The influence of the pavement type on ground-borne vibrations due to road traffic. In: G. De Roeck, et al., eds. Proceedings of 8th international conference on structural dynamics. Leuven: EURODYN 2011, 777–784.
   Google Scholar
• MnROAD, 2015. Safer, smarter, sustainable pavements through innovative research. Monticello: Minnesota Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Nomura, T. and Shiraishi, Y., 2015. A method for estimating road surface conditions with a smartphone. International Journal of Informatics Society, 7 (1), 29–36.
   Google Scholar
• Papagiannakis, A.T., 1997. The need for a new pavement roughness index; RIDE. In: International Truck & Bus Meeting & Exposition. Washington, DC: Society of Automotive Engineers International.
   Google Scholar
• Papoulis, A., 1991. Probalility, random variables, and stochastic processes. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Rajamohan, D., Gannu, B., and Rajan, K.S., 2015. MAARGHA: a prototype system for road condition and surface type estimation by fusing multi-sensor data. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 4 (3), 1225–1245.10.3390/ijgi4031225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar