References
- Al-Omari, B. and Darter, I.M., 1994. Relationships between international roughness index and present serviceability rating. In: Transportation research record: journal of the transportation research board, No. 1435. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, 132–136.
- Anderson-Darling and Shapiro-Wilk Tests 2015. Information technology laboratory. Retrieved from National Institute of Standards and Technology. [Online]. Available from: http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/prc/section2/prc213.htm [ Accessed 10 September 2015].
- ASTM E1927-98, 2012. Standard guide for conducting subjective pavement ride quality ratings. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International. Available from: www.astm.org.
- Carey, J.N.W. and Irick, P.E., 1960. The pavement serviceability-performance concept. Highway Research Board Bulletin No. 250, 40–58.
- Gillespie, T.D. 1985. Measuring Road Roughness and Its Effects on User Cost and Comfort: A Symposium. vol. 884., ASTM International.
- Gulen, et al., 1994. Correlation of present serviceability ratings with international roughness index. In: Transportation research record: journal of the transportation research board, No.1435. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, 27–37.
- Hernán de Solminihac, T., et al., 2003. Analysis of pavement serviceability for the ASHTO design method: the Chilean case. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 28 (2; Part B), 143–160.
- Hudson, W., et al., 1985. Root-mean-square vertical acceleration as a summary roughness statistic. In: Measuring Road Roughness and its Effects on User Cost and Comfort. ASTM International.
- Huntington, G.H., et al., 2013. Mitigating impacts of oil and gas traffic on southeastern Wyoming county roads. Cheyenne, Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming.
- Inertial Road Profiler 2016. Pathway Services Inc. Retrieved from Pathway Services Inc. [Online] Available from: http://www.pathwayservices.com/inertial_road_profiler.shtml [ Accessed 3 January 2016].
- Janisch, D., 2009. An overview of Mn/DOT’s pavement condition rating procedures and indices. [Online]. Available from: http://www.dot.state.mn.us/materials/pvmtmgmtdocs/Rating_Overview_State.pdf [ Accessed 10 September 2015].
- Nair, S.K., Hudson, W.R., and Lee, C.E., 1985. Realistic pavement serviceability equations using the 690D surface dynamics profilometer. Research Report 354-1F, Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
- Nakamura, V.F., 1962. Serviceability ratings of highway pavements. Thesis (Masters). Purdue University.10.5703/1288284313603
- Pologruto, M., 1999. Vermont agency of transportation ride quality study. [Online]. Available from: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjpja7vmJbKAhVPz2MKHc2_CD0QFggcMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fresearch.transportation.org%2F_layouts%2FAASHTORAC%2FFileDownload.aspx%3FSurveyFileID%3D242&usg=AFQjCNHu0z501xWKkO52Byo7-Olxhyv5gA&bvm=bv.110151844,d.cGc [ Accessed 6 January 2016].
- Saha, P. and Ksaibati, K., 2015. A risk-based optimisation methodology for pavement management system of county roads. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, doi:10.1080/10298436.2015.1065992.
- Sayers, M.W. and Karamihas, S.M., 1998.The little book of profiling, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
- Shafizadeh, K.R., Mannering, F.L., and Pierce, L.M., 2002. A statistical analysis of factors associated with driver-perceived road roughness on urban highways. Research Report WA-RD538.1. Washington State Transportation Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
- Shahin, M.Y., 2005. Pavement management for airports, roads, and parking lots. vol. 501. New York, NY: Springer.