Gradation design of porous asphalt mixture (PAM) for low-strength application in wet environment

References

• AAPA, 2002. Light duty asphalt pavemen. No. IG-5. Kew Victoria: Australian Asphalt Pavement Association [AAPA].
   Google Scholar
• AAPA, 2004. National asphalt specification. 2nd ed. Kew Victoria: Australian Asphalt Pavement Association [AAPA].
   Google Scholar
• AI, 1996. Superpave design method. Lexington, KY: Asphalt Institute [AI].
   Google Scholar
• AI, 1997. Mix design methods for asphalt concrete and other hot-mix types. Lexington, KY: Asphalt Institute [AI].
   Google Scholar
• Al-Jarallah, M. and Tons, E., 1981. Void content prediction in two-size aggregate mixes. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 9 (1), 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez, A.E., et al., 2010. Evaluation of durability tests for permeable friction course mixtures. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 11 (1), 49–60.10.1080/10298430902730539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AS, 1995. Method 13.1: Determination of the resilient modulus of asphalt-indirect tensile method. AS 2891.13.1. Australian Standard [AS].
   Google Scholar
• ASTM, 2008. Standard practice for open-greaded friction course (OGFC) mix design. Vol. D7064-08. Philadephia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials [ASTM].
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, M.E. and Shaw, C.B., 2007. Benefits of porous asphalt overlay on storm water quality. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2025, 127–134.10.3141/2025-13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce, K.F., 2005. Porous pavements. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Charbeneau, R.J. and Barrett, M.E., 2008. Drainage hydraulics of permeable friction courses. Water Resources Research, 44 (4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M.J. and Wong, Y.D., 2016. Evaluation of the development of aggregate packing in porous asphalt mixture using discrete element method simulation. Road Materials and Pavement Design. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14680629.2016.1138881?journalCode=trmp20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleri, E., et al., 2013. Clogging evaluation of open graded friction course pavements tested under rainfall and heavy vehicle simulators. Journal of Environmental Management, 129, 164–172.10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, Q., et al., 2013. Investigation into laboratory abrasion test methods for pervious concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 25 (7), 886–892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drainasphaltschichten, 2001. Standards for porous asphalt. SN 640 433b, Konzeption Anforderung, Ausführung.
   Google Scholar
• Fabb, T.R.J., 1998. Porous asphalt surface courses. In: J.C. Nicholls, ed. Asphalt surfacings. London: Spon Press, 187–218.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, K.T. and Ma, C.X., 2001. Orthogonal and uniform experimental design (in Chinese). Beijing: Science Press.
   Google Scholar
• Florida DOT, 2004. Florida method of test for measurement of water permeability of compacted asphalt paving mixture. FM5-565. FL: Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Fong, M., 2012. The weather and climate of Singapore. Singapore: Meteorological Service Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, W.B. and Thompson, S.E., 1907. The Laws of proportioning concrete. Journal of Transportation Division, 59, 67–143.
   Google Scholar
• Furnas, C.C., 1931. Grading aggregates I-mathematical relations for beds of broken solids of maximum density. U.S. Bureau of Mines, 23 (9), 1052–1058.
   Google Scholar
• Fwa, T.F., Tan, S.A. and Guwe, Y.K., 1999. Laboratory evaluation of clogging potential of porous asphalt mixtures. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1681, 43–49.10.3141/1681-06
   Google Scholar
• Good, J.F. and Lufsy, L.A., 1965. Voids, permeability, film thickness vs. asphalt hardening. Proceedings, Association of Asphalt Pavement Technologists [AAPT], vol. 34.
   Google Scholar
• Hardiman, H., 2004. Application of packing theory on grading design for porous asphalt mixtures. Civil Engineering Dimension, 6 (2), 57–63.
   Google Scholar
• Herrington, P.R., Reilly, S. and Cook, S., 2005. Porous asphalt durability test transfund New Zealand research report. No. 265. Lower Hutt: Opus International Consultants, Central Laboratories.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, T.W., Chen, S.C. and Hung, K.N., 2011. Performance evaluation of asphalt rubber in porous asphalt-concrete mixtures. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 23 (3), 342–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JHPC, 1994. Design and execution manual for porous asphalt. Haisuisei-hosou Sekkei Sekou Manual. Tokyo: Japan Highway Public Corporation [JHPC].
   Google Scholar
• Khalid, H. and Jimenez, P.F.K., 1995. Performance assessment of Spanish and British porous asphalts performance and durability of bituminous materials. London: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kandhal, P., 2002. Design, construction, and maintenance of open-graded asphalt friction courses. Information series 115, Lanhuam, MD: National Asphalt Pavement Association [NAPA].
   Google Scholar
• Koh, P.P. and Wong, Y.D., 2012. The evolution of cycling in Singapore. Journeys, 9, 39–50.
   Google Scholar
• LTA, 2010. Engineering group materials & workmanship specification for civil & structural works. Singapore: Land Transport Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Mansour, T.N. and Putman, B.J., 2013. Influence of aggregate gradation on the performance properties of porous asphalt mixtures. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 25 (2), 281–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NEA, 2014. Weatherwise Singapore. [Online]. Singapore: National Environment Agency [NEC]. Available from: http://app2.nea.gov.sg/weather-climate/climate-information/weather-statistics [Accessed 27 July 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, J.C., 1997. Review of UK porous asphalt trials. Vol. TRL Report 264. London: Transport Research Laboratory [TRL].
   Google Scholar
• Poulikakos, L.D. and Partl, M.N., 2010. Investigation of porous asphalt microstructure using optical and electron microscopy. Journal of Microscopy, 240, 145–154.10.1111/jmi.2010.240.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajib, B.M., Prithvi, S.K., Cooley, L.A. and Donald, E.W., 2000. Design, construction, and performance of new-generation open-graded friction courses. Auburn, AL: National Center for Asphalt Technology [NCAT].
   Google Scholar
• Ranieri, V., Sansalone, J.J. and Shuler, S., 2010. Relationships among gradation curve, clogging resistance, and pore-based indices of porous asphalt mixes. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 11, 507–525.10.1080/14680629.2010.9690344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranieri, V., et al., 2012. Measurement of hydraulic conductivity in porous mixes. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2295, 1–10.10.3141/2295-01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranieri, V., Ying, G. and Sansalone, J., 2012. Drainage modeling of roadway systems with porous friction courses. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 138 (4), 395–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roque, R., Huang, S. and Ruth, B.E., 1997. Maximizing shear resistance of asphalt mixtures by proper selection of aggregate gradation. The 8th International Society for Asphalt Pavements, Seattle, WA, 249–268.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz, A., et al., 1990. Porous asphalt mixtures in Spain. Transportation Research Record, 1265, 87–94.
   Google Scholar
• Rungruangvirojn, P. and Kanitpong, K., 2010. Measurement of visibility loss due to splash and spray: porous, SMA and conventional asphalt pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 11 (6), 499–510.10.1080/10298430903578945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starke, P., Gobel, P. and Coldewey, W.G., 2010. Urban evaporation rates for water-permeable pavements. Water Science & Technology, 62 (5), 1161–1169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• STP, 1993. Standard tests procedure manual-asphalt mixes: retained Marshall stability. Saskatoon: Saskatchewhan Highways and Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Suresha, S.N., George, V. and Shankar, A.U.R., 2009. Evaluation of properties of porous friction course mixes for different gyration levels. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 21 (12), 789–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresha, S.N., George, V. and Ravi Shankar, A.U.R., 2010. Effect of aggregate gradations on properties of porous friction course mixes. Materials and Structures, 43, 789–801.10.1617/s11527-009-9548-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, S.A., Fwa, T.F. and Guwe, V.Y.K., 2000. Laboratory measurements and analysis of clogging mechanism of porous asphalt mixes. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 28 (3), 207–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, S.A., Fwa, T.F. and Chai, K.C., 2004. Drainage considerations for porous asphalt surface course design. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1868, 142–149.10.3141/1868-15
   Google Scholar
• Tayfur, S., Ozen, H. and Aksoy, A., 2007. Investigation of rutting performance of asphalt mixtures containing polymer modifiers. Construction and Building Materials, 21 (2), 328–337.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TNZ, 2007. Specification for open graded porous asphalt. SP/SP 11 070704. Ararau Aotearoa: Transit New Zealand [TNZ].
   Google Scholar
• Vavrik, W.R., et al., 2002. Bailey method for gradation selection in HMA mixture design. Transportation Research Circular E-C044, Washington, DC: National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, D.E., Masad, E., Moore, K.A., Williams, K. and Cooley, L.A. Jr., 2004. Verification of voids in coarse aggregate testing: determining stone-on-stone contact of hot-mix asphalt mixtures. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1891, 182–190.10.3141/1891-21
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, Z.H., 2005. The application of ‘bailey method’ in porous asphalt (in Chinese). Unpublished master thesis. Taiwan National Cheng Kung University.
   Google Scholar