632
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Mechanistic-empirical methodology for the selection of cost-effective rehabilitation strategy for flexible pavements

, , &
Pages 675-684 | Received 13 Nov 2015, Accepted 20 May 2016, Published online: 04 Jul 2016

References

  • AASHTO pp 60–13, 2015. Standard practice for preparation of cylindrical performance test specimens using the superpave gyratory compactor (SGC). Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 35th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
  • AASHTO T 322-07, A. T., 2015. Determining the creep compliance and strength of hot mix asphalt using the indirect tensile test device. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 35th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
  • AASHTO TP79-13, A. T., 2015. Determining the dynamic modulus and flow number for asphalt mixtures using the asphalt mixture performance tester (AMPT). Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 35th ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
  • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), 1993. AASHTO guide for design of pavement structures. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
  • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), 2008. Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide: a manual of practice. Interim ed. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
  • California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), 2010. Life-cycle cost analysis procedures manual. State of California, Department of Transportation, Pavement Standards Team & Division of Design. Available from: www.dot.ca.gov/hq/maint/Pavement/Offices/Pavement_Engineering/PDF/LCCA_Manual_09_01_2010_Final.pdf
  • Carvalho, R., et al., 2011. Impact of design features on pavement response and performance in rehabilitated flexible and rigid pavements. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.
  • Chen, D. H. and Scullion, T., 2007. Using nondestructive testing technologies to assist in selecting the optimal pavement rehabilitation strategy. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 35, 1–9.
  • Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), 2002. Life-cycle cost analysis primer. Washington, DC, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. Available from: isddc.dot.gov/OLPFiles/FHWA/010621.pdf
  • Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), 2004. Life-cycle cost analysis realcost user manual. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. Available from: www.fhwa.dot.gov/infrastructure/asstmgmt/rc210704.pdf
  • Hall, K.T. and Simpson, A. L., 2002. LTPP data analysis: effectiveness of maintenance and rehabilitation options. Washington, DC: National Cooperative Highway Research Program.
  • Hall, K., Xiao, D., and Wang, K., 2011. Calibration of the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide for flexible pavement design in Arkansas. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2226, 135–141.10.3141/2226-15
  • Hartronft, B. C., 1976. Performance of coarse aggregate, hot sand and asphalt concrete base in Oklahoma. Transportation Research Circular Journal, 177, 20–eoa.
  • Liu, W. and Scullion, T., Modulus 6.0 For Windows: user’s Manual. Austin, TX, Texas Department of Transportation. Available from: http://d2dtl5nnlpfr0r.cloudfront.net/tti.tamu.edu/documents/1869-2.pdf
  • Loulizi, A., Flintsch, G., and McGhee, K., 2006. Determination of the In-Place Hot-Mix asphalt layer modulus for rehabilitation projects using a mechanistic-empirical procedure. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.
  • Nobakht, M., et al., 2016. Development of performance-based and cost-effective rehabilitation strategies for high-traffic-volume flexible pavement ed. Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC
  • Oklahoma Highway Department (OHD), 1965. Engineering classification of geologic materials (Red books). Oklahoma City, OK: ODOT, Reserach and Development Division.
  • Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT), 2009. 2009 Standard Specification Book. Oklahoma City, OK: ODOT, Pavement Management Branch.
  • Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT), 2011. Conditions and performance of pavements on the national highway system in Oklahoma. Oklahoma City, OK: ODOT, Pavement Management Branch.
  • Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT), 2012. Interstate highway structural pavement history. Oklahoma City, OK: ODOT, Pavement Management Branch.
  • Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT), 2005. Pavement management distress rating guide. Oklahoma City, OK: ODOT, pavement Managment Branch.
  • Peshkin, D., et al., 2011. Preservation approaches for high-traffic-volume roadways. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board. Available from: http://www.trb.org/Main/Blurbs/165280.aspx
  • Rauhut, J.B., Von Quintus, H.L., and Eltahan, A.A., 2000. Performance of rehabilitated asphalt concrete pavements in the LTPP experiments – Data collected through February 1997. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
  • Sakhaeifar, M., et al., 2013. Evaluation of long-lasting perpetual asphalt pavement with life-cycle cost analysis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2368, 3–11.10.3141/2368-01
  • Sakhaeifar, M.S., Richard Kim, Y. and Kabir, P., 2015. New predictive models for the dynamic modulus of hot mix asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, 76, 221–231.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.11.011
  • Sakhaeifar, M.S., et al., 2016. Selection of long lasting rehabilitation treatment using life cycle cost analysis and present serviceability rating. Final Report: FHWA-Ok-15-06, Oklahoma City, OK.
  • Von Quintus, H.L. and Mallela, J., 2005. Reducing flexible pavement distress in colorado through the use of PMA mixtures. Englewood, CO: Colorado Asphalt Pavement Association.
  • Von Quintus, H.L., Simpson, A.L., and Eltahan, A.A., 2001. Rehabilitation of asphalt concrete pavements – Initial Evaluation of the SPS-5 Experiment. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
  • Wu, Z., et al., 2010. Performance evaluation of various rehabilitation and preservation treatments. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
  • Zaghloul, S. and Elfino, M., 2000. Pavement rehabilitation selection based on mechanistic analysis and field diagnosis of falling weight deflectometer data: virginia experience. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1730, 177–186.10.3141/1730-21

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.