502
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Notes

Studies on modulus of resilience using cyclic tri-axial test and correlations to PFWD, DCP, and CBR

&
Pages 976-985 | Received 08 Dec 2015, Accepted 19 Aug 2016, Published online: 06 Oct 2016

References

  • AASHTO , 1993. AASHTO Guide for design of pavement structures . Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
  • AASHTO: T307 , 1999. Determination of resilient modulus of sub-grade soils and granular base and sub-base materials . Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
  • AASHTO: T307-99 , 2003. Determining the resilient modulus of soils and aggregate materials . Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
  • Abu-Farsakh, M. , et al. , 2004. Evaluation of in situ stiffness modulus of sub-grades and base layers using the geo-gauge device. International Journal of Pavements , 3 (1–2), 89–101.
  • Al-Refeai, T.O. and Al-Suhaibani, A.S. , 2002. Factors affecting resilient behavior of sub grade soils in Saudi Arabia. Journal of King Saud University – Engineering Sciences , 14 (2), 165–182.
  • Alshibli, K.A. , Farsakah, M.U. , and Seyman, E. , 2005. Laboratory evaluation of the geogauge and light falling weight deflectometer as construction control tools. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering , 17 (5), 560–569.10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:5(560)
  • Andrei, D. , et al. , 2004. Harmonized resilient modulus test method for unbound pavement materials. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board , 1874, 29–37.10.3141/1874-04
  • Burczyk, J.M. , Ksaibati, R. , and Anderson-Sprecha, R. , 1994. Factors influencing determination of a subgrade resilient modulus value. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, ( Transportation Research Board 1462), 72–78.
  • Casagrande , 1932. A research on the Atterberg limits of soils. Public Roads , 13, 121–136.
  • Chen, D.H. , et al. , 2005. A correlation between dynamic cone penetrometer values and pavement layer moduli. Geotechnical Testing Journal , 38 (1), 42–49.
  • Drumm, E.C. , Boateng-Poku, Y. , and Pierce, T.J. , 1990. Estimation of subgrade resilient modulus from standard tests. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering , 116 (5), 774–789.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1990)116:5(774)
  • Gabr, M.A. , et al. , 2000. DCP criteria for performance evaluation of pavement layers. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities , 14 (4), 141–148.10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2000)14:4(141)
  • George, K.P. , 1992. Resilient testing of soils using gyratory testing machine . Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, ( Transportation Research Record 1369), 63–72.
  • George, V.Ch. , Rao, N. , and Shivashankar, R. , 2009a. PFWD, DCP and CBR correlations for evaluation of lateritic subgrades. International Journal of Pavement Engineering , 10 (3), 189–199.10.1080/10298430802342765
  • George, V.Ch. , Rao, N. , and Shivashankar, R. , 2009b. Investigations on unsoaked blended laterite using PFWD, PBT, DCP, and CBR tests. Journal of Indian Roads Congress , 70 (3), 223–233. ISSN 0258-0500.
  • Hardcastle, J.H. , 1992. Sub grade resilient modulus for idaho pavements . Moscow, ID: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Idaho, ( Final Report of ITD Research Project RP 110-D, Agreement No. 89–47), 252.
  • Hicks, R.G. and Monismith, C.L. , 1971. Factors influencing the resilient properties of granular materials. Washington, DC: Highway Research Board, ( Highway Research Record 345).
  • Huang, Y.H. , 2004. Pavement analysis and design . Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • IS: 1498 , 1970: Classification and identification of soils for general engineering purposes . Reaffirmed in 2007. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards.
  • IS: 2720 Part V , 1985. Determination of liquid and plastic limit. In: Compendium of Indian Standards on Soil Engineering-Part 1: Laboratory Testing of Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes . New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards, 109–114.
  • IS: 2720 Part IV , 1985. Indian Standard Methods of Test for soils: Grain size analysis. In: Compendium of Indian Standards on soil Engineering-Part 1: Laboratory testing of soil for civil engineering purpose . New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards, 73–91.
  • IS: 2720 Part VI , 1972. Indian Standard Methods of Test for Soils: determination of shrinkage factor. In: Compendium of Indian Standards on Soil Engineering-Part 1: Laboratory Testing of Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes . New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards, 115–117.
  • IS: 2720 Part VII , 1980. Indian standard methods of test for soils: determination of water content-dry density relation using compaction. In: Compendium of Indian Standard on Soil Engineering-Part 1: LABORATORY Testing of Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes . New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards, 162–164.
  • IS: 2720 Part-16 , 1987. Indian standard methods of test for soils: determination of CBR . New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards, 1–16.
  • Jurgenson, L. , 1934. The application of theories of elasticity and plasticity to foundation problems. In: Contributions to Soil Mechanics 1925–1940 . Boston: Boston Society of Civil Engineers, 148–183.
  • Lee, W. , et al. , 1997. Resilient modulus of cohesive soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering , 123 (2), 131–136.10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:2(131)
  • Li, D. and Selig, E.T. , 1994. Resilient modulus for fine‐grained subgrade soils. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering , 120 (6), 939–957.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:6(939)
  • Monismith, C.L. , 1989. MR testing interpretation of laboratory results for Design Purposes . Corvallis: Oregon State University, ( Workshop on Resilient Modulus Testing). Available from: http://books.google.co.in.
  • Nazzal, M. , 2003. Field evaluation of in situ test technology for QC/QA procedures during construction of pavement layers and embankments . MS thesis, Lousiana State University, Baton Rough, 112.
  • Osinubi, K.J. , et al. , 2012. Effect of fines content on the engineering properties of reconstituted lateritic soils in waste containment application. Nigerian Journal of Technology , 91 (9), 277–287.
  • Pezo, R. and Hudson, W.R. , 1994. Prediction models of resilient modulus for non granular materials. Geotechnical Testing Journal , 17 (3), 349–355.
  • Powell, W.D. , et al. , 1984. The structural design of bituminous roads . Crowthorne: Transportation and Road Research Laboratory, ( TRRL Laboratory Report 1132), 62.
  • Rada, G. and Witczak, M.W. , 1981. Comprehensive evaluation of laboratory resilient moduli results for granular material . Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, ( Transportation Research Record, No. 810), 23–33.
  • Rao, C.N. , George, V. , and Shivasankar, R. , 2008. PFWD, CBR, and DCP evaluation of lateritic sub-grades of Dakshina Kannada, India. In: Proceedings of 12th International Conference of International Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics (IACMAG). Goa, 4417–4423.
  • Seed, H. , Chan, C. , and Lee, C. , 1962. Resilient modulus of sub grade soils and their relation to fatigue failures in asphalt pavements. In: Proceedings, International conference on the structural design of asphalt pavements. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, 611–636.
  • Thomson, M.R. and Robnett, Q.L. , 1976. Resilient properties of subgrade soils . Final Report. IL : University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, ( Final Report, Illinois Cooperative Highway and Transportation, Serial No. 160).
  • U.S. Army Engineers Waterways Experiment Station , 1960. Unified soil classification system: appendix B . Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Corps of Engineers, ( Technical Memorandum No. 3–357).
  • Uthus, Lillian , 2007. Deformation properties of unbound granular aggregates . Doctoral Thesis. Faculty of Engineering, Department of Civil Transport Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.