Large-scale direct shear testing of geogrid-reinforced aggregate base over weak subgrade

References

• AASHTO M 145-91 , 1993. Classification of soils and soil-aggregate mixtures for highway construction purposes . Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 122–126.
   Google Scholar
• Abdi, M.R. , Sadrnejad, A. , and Arjomand, M.A. , 2009. Strength enhancement of clay by encapsulating geogrids in thin layers of sand. Geotextiles and Geomembranes , 27 (6), 447–455.10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu-Farsakh, M. , Coronel, J. , and Tao, M. , 2007. Effect of soil moisture content and dry density on cohesive soil–geosynthetic interactions using large direct shear tests. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering , 19 (7), 540–549.10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:7(540)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Qadi, I.L. , et al. , 1994. Laboratory evaluation of geosynthetic reinforced pavement sections. Transportation Research Board , No. 1439, 25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Qadi, I.L. , et al. , 2011. Geogrid mechanism in low volume flexible pavements: accelerated testing of full-scale heavily instrumented pavement sections. International Journal of Pavement Engineering , 12 (2), 121–135.10.1080/10298436.2010.535534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arulrajah, A. , et al. , 2014. Evaluation of interface shear strength properties of geogrid-reinforced construction and demolition materials using a modified large-scale direct shear testing apparatus. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering , 26 (5), 974–982.10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arulrajah, A. , et al. , 2015. Evaluation of interface shear strength properties of geogrid reinforced foamed recycled glass using a large-scale direct shear testing apparatus. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering , 1–8. doi:10.1155/2015/235424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM D2487-11 , 2011. Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified Soil Classification System) . West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D5321 , 2014. Standard test method for determining the shear strength of soil-geosynthetic and geosynthetic-geosynthetic interfaces by direct shear . West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• Barksdale, R.D. , Brown, S.F. , and Chan, F. , 1989. Potential benefits of geosynthetics in flexible pavement systems . Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, NCHRP Report 315.
   Google Scholar
• Bergado, D.T. , et al. , 1993. Interaction between cohesive-frictional soil and various grid reinforcements. Geotextiles and Geomembranes , 12 (4), 327–349.10.1016/0266-1144(93)90008-C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biabani, M.M. and Indraratna, B. , 2015. An evaluation of the interface behaviour of rail subballast stabilised with geogrids and geomembranes. Geotextiles and Geomembranes , 43 (3), 240–249.10.1016/j.geotexmem.2015.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biabani, M.M. , Indraratna, B. , and Nimbalkar, S. , 2016. Assessment of interface shear behaviour of sub-ballast with geosynthetics by large-scale direct shear test. Procedia Engineering , 143, 1007–1015.10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.094
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S.F. , Kwan, J. , and Thom, N.H. , 2007. Identifying the key parameters that influence geogrid reinforcement of railway ballast. Geotextiles and Geomembranes , 25 (6), 326–335.10.1016/j.geotexmem.2007.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cancelli, A. , Rimoldi, P. , and Togni, S. , 1992. Frictional characteristics of geogrids by means of direct shear and pullout tests. In: H. Ochiai , S. Hayashi and J. Otani , eds. International Symposium on earth reinforcement practice , 11–13 November. Fukuoka, Japan, 51–56.
   Google Scholar
• Cazzuffi, D. , et al. , 1993. Laboratory investigations on the shear strength of geogrid reinforced soils. ASTM Special Technical Publication , No. 1190, 119–137.
   Google Scholar
• Dash, S.K. , Rajagopal, K. , and Krishnaswamy, N.R. , 2001. Strip footing on geocell reinforced sand beds with additional planar reinforcement. Geotextiles and Geomembranes , 19 (8), 529–538.10.1016/S0266-1144(01)00022-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezzein, F. and Bathurst, R.J. , 2012. Analysis of geogrid-soil interaction using a transparent granular soil. 5th European Geosynthetics Congress , 16–19 September. Valencia, Spain , 5, 200–204.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, F.B. , Vieira, C.S. , and Lopes, M.L. , 2015. Direct shear behaviour of residual soil–geosynthetic interfaces – influence of soil moisture content, soil density and geosynthetic type. Geosynthetics International , 22 (3), 257–272.10.1680/gein.15.00011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GRI , 1998. GRI test methods and standards . Philadelphia, PA : Geosynthetic Research Institute, Drexel University.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, R. , Wall, J. , and Carroll, R.G. , 1988. Geogrid reinforcement of granular bases in flexible pavements. Transportation Research Board , No. 1188, 19–27.
   Google Scholar
• Haeri, S.M. , Noorzad, R. , and Oskoorouchi, A.M. , 2000. Effect of geotextile reinforcement on the mechanical behavior of sand. Geotextiles and Geomembranes , 18 (6), 385–402.10.1016/S0266-1144(00)00005-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain, B. , Sakai, T. , and Hossain, Z. , 2013. Evaluation of sand–geosynthetic interface behavior for earth reinforcement. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering , 7 (3), 251–256.10.1179/1938636213Z.00000000034
   Google Scholar
• Hufenus, R. , et al. , 2006. Full-scale field tests on geosynthetic reinforced unpaved roads on soft subgrade. Geotextiles and Geomembranes , 24 (1), 21–37.10.1016/j.geotexmem.2005.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indraratna, B. , Hussaini, S.K.K. , and Vinod, J.S. , 2012. On the shear behavior of ballast-geosynthetic interfaces. Geotechnical Testing Journal , 35 (2), 305–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamalzare, M. and Ziaie-Moayed, R. , 2011. Influence of geosynthetic reinforcement on the shear strength characteristics of two-layer sub-grade. Acta Geotechnica Slovenica , 8 (1), 39–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C.-N. , et al. , 2009a. Behavior of Geogrid-Sand Interface in Direct Shear Mode. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering , 135 (12), 1863–1871.10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C.-N. , Ho, Y.-H. , and Huang, J.-W. , 2009b. Large scale direct shear tests of soil/PET-yarn geogrid interfaces. Geotextiles and Geomembranes , 27 (1), 19–30.10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murthy, B.R.S. , Sridharan, A. , and Bindumadhava , 1993. Evaluation of interfacial frictional resistance. Geotextiles and Geomembranes , 12 (3), 235–253.10.1016/0266-1144(93)90028-M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naeini, S.A. , Khalaj, M. and Izadi, E. , 2013. Interface shear strength of silty sand–geogrid composite. Proceedings of the ICE: Geotechnical Engineering , 166 (GE1), 67–75.
   Google Scholar
• Padade, A.H. and Mandal, J.N. , 2014. Interface strength behavior of expanded polystyrene EPS geofoam. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering , 8 (1), 66–71.10.1179/1938636213Z.00000000056
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, S.W. and Ismeik, M. , 1997. A synthesis and evaluation of geosynthetic-reinforced base layers in flexible pavements – Part II. Geosynthetics International , 4 (6), 605–621.10.1680/gein.4.0107
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, S.W. , Ismeik, M. , and Fogelsong, M.L. , 1998. Mechanical response of a geosynthetic-reinforced pavement system to cyclic loading. In: R.S. Nordal and G. Refsdal , eds. 5th International Conference on Bearing Capacity of Roads and Airfields , 6–8 July. Trondheim, Norway, 1503–1512.
   Google Scholar
• Sarsby, R.W. , 1985. The influence of aperture size/particle size on the efficiency of grid reinforcement. 2nd Canadian Symposium on Geotextiles and Geomembranes , 23–24 September. Edmonton, Canada, 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, T.D. , Williamson, T.A. , and Eid, H.T. , 1996. HDPE Geomembrane/Geotextile Interface Shear Strength. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering , 122 (3), 197–203.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:3(197)
   Google Scholar
• Tanchaisawat, T. , et al. , 2010. Interaction between geogrid reinforcement and tire chip-sand lightweight backfill. Geotextiles and Geomembranes , 28 (1), 119–127.10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, X. , Chehab, G. , and Palomino, A.M. , 2008. Evaluation of geogrids for stabilising weak pavement subgrade. International Journal of Pavement Engineering , 9 (6), 413–429.10.1080/10298430802279827
   Google Scholar
• Umashankar, B. , Hariprasad, C. , and Sasanka Mouli, S. , 2015. Interface properties of metal-grid and geogrid reinforcements with sand. IFCEE 2015 , 17–21 March. San Antonio, TX , 1430–1438.
   Google Scholar
• Vieira, C.S. and Pereira, P.M. , 2016. Interface shear properties of geosynthetics and construction and demolition waste from large-scale direct shear tests. Geosynthetics International , 23 (1), 62–70.10.1680/jgein.15.00030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, W. , et al. , 2012. Influence factors of geogrid–soil interface shear strength and contribution of transverse ribs of geogrid. 5th Asian Regional Conference on Geosynthetics , 13–15 December. Bangkok, 785–792.
   Google Scholar