Airport pavement responses obtained from wireless sensing network upon digital signal processing

References

• Alavi, A.H., et al., 2016.Continuous health monitoring of pavement systems using smart sensing technology. Construction and Building Materials, 114, 719–736.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Qadi, I.L., et al., 2004. The Virginia smart road: the impact of pavement instrumentation on understanding pavement performance. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 73, 427–465.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Qadi, I.L., et al., 2010. Runway instrumentation and response measurements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2153, 162–169.10.3141/2153-18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amarasiri, S., et al., 2010. Optical texture-based tools for monitoring pavement surface wear and cracks using digital images. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2153, 130–140.10.3141/2153-15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, H.B., Buth, M.R., and Van Deusen, D.A., 1994. Load response instrumentation installation and testing procedures. St. Paul: Minnesota Department of Transportation, Technical Report MN/PR-94/01.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, E.R., Cooley, L.A., and Hanson, D., 2002. NCAT test track design, construction, and performance. Auburn, AL: National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn University.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, T.R., Tewfik, A., and Srirangarajan, S., 2007. Development of a computer program for selecting peak dynamic sensor responses from pavement testing. St. Paul: Minnesota Department of Transportation, Technical Report MN/RD-2007-49.
   Google Scholar
• Dai, S. and Van Deusen, D., 1996. Digital signal processing for MN/ROAD offline data. St. Paul: Minnesota Department of Transportation, Technical Report MN/PR-96/09.
   Google Scholar
• Dong, Z.J., et al., 2012. Asphalt pavement structural health monitoring utilizing FBG sensors. Harbin: Advanced Engineering Forum, ISTP, 339–344.
   Google Scholar
• FHWA, 1996. Research and technology program 1996–2000: summary of FHWA’s research and technology program. McLean, VA: Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center, Technical Report FHWA-RD-96-094.
   Google Scholar
• Georgopoulos, A., Loizos, A., and Flouda, A., 1995. Digital image processing as a tool for pavement distress evaluation. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 50 (1), 23–33.10.1016/0924-2716(95)91844-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayhoe, G., Cornwell, R., and Garg, N., 2001. Slow-rolling response tests on the test pavements at the National Airport Pavement Test Facility (NAPTF). 27th International Air Transportation Conference. Chicago, IL, 30–44.10.1061/9780784405796
   Google Scholar
• Huang, J., Liu, W., and Sun, X., 2014. A pavement crack detection method combining 2D with 3D information based on Dempster-Shafer theory. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engneering, 29 (4), 299–313.10.1111/mice.2014.29.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, C., et al., 2015. A review on computer vision based defect detection and condition assessment of concrete and asphalt civil infrastructure. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 29 (2), 196–210.10.1016/j.aei.2015.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lajnef, N., et al., 2013. Smart pavement monitoring system. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Report FHWA-HRT-12-072.
   Google Scholar
• Loulizi, A., et al., 2001. Data collection and management of instrumented smart road flexible pavement sections. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1769, 142–151.10.3141/1769-17
   Google Scholar
• Mathavan, S., Kamal, K., and Rahman, M., 2015. A review of three-dimensional imaging technologies for pavement distress detection and measurements. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 16 (5), 2353–2362.10.1109/TITS.2015.2428655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra, S.K., 2005. Discrete-time signals and systems in the time-domain. Digital signal processing: a computer-based approach. New York: McGraw-Hill, 60–90.
   Google Scholar
• Nazarian, S. and Desai, M., 1993. Automated surface wave method: field testing. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 119 (7), 1094–1111.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1993)119:7(1094)
   Google Scholar
• Rollings, R.S. and Pittman, D.W., 1992. Field instrumentation and performance monitoring of rigid pavements. Journal of Transportation Engneering, 118 (3), 361–370.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1992)118:3(361)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timm, D.H., Priest, A.L., and McEwen, T.V., 2004. Design and instrumentation of the structural pavement experiment at the NCAT test track. Auburn, AL: National Center Asphalt Technology, Auburn University.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Q. and Prozzi, J.A., 2014. Static versus viscoelastic wave propagation approach for simulating loading effects on flexible pavement structure. Construction and Building Material, 53, 584–595.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, W., Wang, D., and Wang, L., 2015. Monitoring the speed, configurations, and weight of vehicles using an in-situ wireless sensing nework. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 16 (4), 1667–1675.10.1109/TITS.2014.2364186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, S. and Al-Qadi, I.L., 2016. Development of an analytic approach utilizing the extended common midpoint method to estimate asphalt pavement thickness with 3-D ground-penetrating radar. NDT & E International, 78, 29–36.10.1016/j.ndteint.2015.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, Q., et al., 2012. CrackTree: automatic crack detection from pavement images. Pattern Recognition Letters, 33 (3), 227–238.10.1016/j.patrec.2011.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar