Automatic classification of pavement crack using deep convolutional neural network

References

• Available from: www.asphaltinstitute.org/asphalt-pavement-distress-summary/ [Accessed 20 April 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Behnke, S, 2003. Hierarchical neural networks for image interpretation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2766 (3), 1345–1346.
   Google Scholar
• Bray, J., et al., 2006. A neural network based technique for automatic classification of road cracks. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. IEEE, 2006, 907–912.
   Google Scholar
• Canny, J., 1986. A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Computer Society, 679–698.
   Google Scholar
• Cha, Y.J., Choi, W., and Büyüköztürk, O., 2017. Deep learning-based crack damage detection using convolutional neural networks. Computer-aided Civil & Infrastructure Engineering, 32 (5), 361–378. doi: 10.1111/mice.12263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, H., et al., 2001. Novel approach to pavement cracking detection based on neural network. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1764 (1), 119–127. doi: 10.3141/1764-13
   Google Scholar
• Chou, J., O’Neill, W.A., and Cheng, H., 1995. Pavement distress evaluation using fuzzy logic and moment invariants. Transportation Research Record, 39–46.
   Google Scholar
• Downey, A.B. and Koutsopoulos, H.N., 1993. Primitive-based classification of pavement cracking images. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 119 (3), 402–418. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1993)119:3(402)
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, R., Pratt, D., and Macintyre, I., 1998. Automated detection and classification of cracking in road pavements (RoadCrack). 19th ARRB Transport Research Ltd conference, 1998, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Fukushima, K., 1980. Neurocognitron: a self organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position. Biological Cybernetics, 36 (4), 193–202. doi: 10.1007/BF00344251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, F., et al., 2017. Dual-branch deep convolution neural network for polarimetric SAR image classification. Applied Sciences, 7 (5), 447. doi: 10.3390/app7050447
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, C. and Delakis, M., 2004. Convolutional face finder: a neural architecture for fast and robust face detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence, 26 (11), 1408. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2004.97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, K., et al., 2016. Identity mappings in deep residual networks. European conference on computer vision, Springer, Cham, 630–645.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, Y. and Zhao, C., 2010. A local binary pattern based methods for pavement crack detection. Journal of Pattern Recognition Research, 1, 1(20103), 140–147. doi: 10.13176/11.167
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., and Xu, B., 2006. Automatic inspection of pavement cracking distress. Journal of Electronic Imaging, 15 (1), 013017. doi: 10.1117/1.2177650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahangiri, A. and Rakha, H.A., 2015. Applying machine learning techniques to transportation mode recognition using mobile phone sensor data. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 16 (5), 2406–2417. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2015.2405759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschke, K.R. and Velinsky, S.A., 1992. Histogram-based approach for automated pavement-crack sensing. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 118 (5), 700–710. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1992)118:5(700)
   Google Scholar
• Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., and Hinton, G.E. 2012. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. International conference on neural information processing systems, 1097–1105.
   Google Scholar
• Lecun, Y., et al., 1998a. Efficient BackProp. Neural Networks Tricks of the Trade, 1524 (1), 9–50. doi: 10.1007/3-540-49430-8_2
   Google Scholar
• Lecun, Y., et al., 1998b. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 86 (11), 2278–2324. doi: 10.1109/5.726791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecun, Y., Bengio, Y., and Hinton, G., 2015. Deep learning. Nature, 521 (7553), 436–444. doi: 10.1038/nature14539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C., et al., 2017. Deepgait: a learning deep convolutional representation for view-invariant gait recognition using joint Bayesian. Applied Sciences, 7 (3), 15.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Q. and Liu, X., 2008. Novel approach to pavement image segmentation based on neighboring difference histogram method. Congress on image and signal processing – CISP ’08, 27–30 May 2008. Sanya, Hainan, China.
   Google Scholar
• Mahler, D.S., et al., 1991. Pavement distress analysis using image processing techniques. Computer-aided Civil & Infrastructure Engineering, 6 (1), 1–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8667.1991.tb00393.x
   Google Scholar
• MCAG, 2009. M.C.A.o.G., Pavement management Report for Merced County.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T.S., Avila, M., and Begot, S., 2009. Automatic detection and classification of defect on road pavement using anisotropy measure. European Signal Processing Conference. IEEE, 2009, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, H., Garrick, N.W., and Achenie, L.E.K., 1998. Segmentation algorithm using iterative clipping for processing noisy pavement images. Second international conference on imaging technologies: techniques and applications in civil engineering, Imaging Technologies: Techniques and Applications in Civil Engineering. Second International Conference, Davos, Switzerland, 138–147.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, H. and Lobato Correia, P., 2008. Supervised strategies for cracks detection in images of road pavement flexible surfaces. European signal processing conference, Signal Processing Conference, 2008, European. IEEE, 2008:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Park, J.K., et al., 2016. Machine learning-based imaging system for surface defect inspection. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology, 3 (3), 303–310. doi: 10.1007/s40684-016-0039-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedraza, A., et al., 2017. Automated diatom classification (part B): a deep learning approach. Applied Sciences, 7 (5), 460. doi: 10.3390/app7050460
   Google Scholar
• Shan, T., et al., 2005. Automatic image enhancement driven by evolution based on Ridgelet frame in the presence of noise. Berlin: Springer. 304–313.
   Google Scholar
• Simard, P.Y., Steinkraus, D., and Platt, J.C., 2003. Best practices for convolutional neural networks applied to visual document analysis. International conference on document analysis & recognition, International Conference on Document Analysis & Recognition. IEEE Computer Society, 2003:958.
   Google Scholar
• Smadja, L., Ninot, J., and Gavrilovic, T., 2010. Road extraction and environment interpretation from LIDAR sensors. 38, 281–286.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, K.C.P., et al., 2012. Potential measurement of pavement surface texture based on three-dimensional image data. Transportation Research Board 91st Annual Meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, K.C.P., Gong, W., and Hou, Z. 2008. Automated cracking survey. 6th RILEM international conference on cracking in pavements, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Wöhler, C., 2013. Triangulation-based approaches to three-dimensional scene reconstruction, 171–187.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, M., et al., 2007. Pavement crack detection and analysis for high-grade highway. International conference on electronic measurement and instruments, 4-548–4-552.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., et al., 2016. Road crack detection using deep convolutional neural network. IEEE international conference on image processing, 3708–3712.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, J. and Huang, P.S., 2006. Wavelet-based pavement distress detection and evaluation. Optical Engineering, 45 (2), 409–411. doi: 10.1117/1.2172917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, Q., et al., 2012. Cracktree: automatic crack detection from pavement images. Pattern Recognition Letters, 33 (3), 227–238. doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2011.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar