Mechanical characteristics of Soil-RAP-Geopolymer mixtures for road base and subbase layers

References

• AASHTO, 1999. Standard method of test for determining the resilient modulus of soils and aggregate materials T307 (99th ed.). Washington, DC: American Association of State and Highway official.
   Google Scholar
• American Road & Transportation Builders Association, 2015. Production and use of coal Forecast 1 Market Forecast Through 2033 prepared for: American Coal Ash Association. June 2015 combustion products in the US.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM, 2000a. Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils, D4318-00. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM, 2000b. Standard Test Methods for Amount of Material in Soils Finer than the No. 200 (75-um) Sieve, D1140-00. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM, 2003. Standard test method for dynamic modulus of asphalt mixtures, D3497-79. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM, 2007. Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using modified effort (56,000 ft-lbf/ft3 (2,700 kN-m/m3)), D1557-07. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM, 2015. Standard test methods for wetting and drying compacted soil-cement mixtures, D559/D559M-15. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM, 2016. Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil, D2166/D2166M-16. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM, 2017. Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural Pozzolan for use in concrete, C618-17a. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• Comrie, D.C., Paterson, J.H., and Ritchey, D.J., 1988. Geopolymer technologies in toxic waste management. Proceedings of the 1st European conference on soft mineralogy (geopolymer ‘88), Compiegne, France.
   Google Scholar
• Davidovits, J., 1999. Chemistry of geopolymeric systems, terminology. In: Proceedings of geopolymer international conference. Saint Qunentin, France.
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Protection Agency, 2017. www.epa.gov/coalash/coal-ash-reuse.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Jimenez, A.M., Palomo, A., and Lopez-Hombrados, C., 2006. Engineering properties of alkali activated fly ash concrete. ACI – Materials Journals, 103 (2), 106–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautreau, G., Zhang, Z., and Wu, Z., 2011. Accelerated loading evaluation of subbase layers in pavement performance. Louisiana Transportation Research Center (LTRC), Final Report No. FHWA/LA.09/468.
   Google Scholar
• Hardjito, D., et al. 2004. On the development of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. ACI Materials Journal, 101 (6), 467–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoy, M., Horpibulsuk, S., and Arulrajah, A., 2016. Strength development of recycled asphalt pavement-fly ash geopolymer as a road construction material. Construction and Building Materials, 117, 209–219. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadinia, A., et al. 2016. Stabilization of demolition materials for pavement base/subbase applications using fly ash and slag geopolymers: laboratory investigation. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 28 (7), 04016033. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Asphalt Pavement Association, 2013. Annual Asphalt Pavement Industry Survey on recycled materials and warm-mix asphalt usage: 2009–2012. 3rd Annual Asphalt Pavement Industry Survey IS-138. December 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Singhi, B., Laskar, A., and Ahmed, M., 2016. Investigation on soil–geopolymer with slag, fly ash and their blending. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 41 (2), 393–400. doi: 10.1007/s13369-015-1677-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, A. and Sivakumar, K., 2013. Geopolymer binders: a need for future concrete construction. ISRN Polymer Science, 2013, Article ID 509185. doi: 10.1155/2013/509185
   Google Scholar
• State of Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development. 2006. Louisiana standard specifications for roads and bridges. Part III, 305.04.
   Google Scholar
• Sukmak, P., et al. 2013b. Factors influencing strength development in clay–fly ash geopolymer. Construction and Building Materials, 47, 1125–1136. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukmak, P., Horpibulsuk, S., and Shen, S., 2013a. Strength development in clay–fly ash geopolymer. Construction and Building Materials, 40, 566–574. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Deventer, J.S., Provis, J.L., and Duxson, P., 2012. Technical and commercial progress in the adoption of geopolymer cement. Minerals Engineering, 29, 89–104. doi: 10.1016/j.mineng.2011.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallah, S. and Rangan, V., 2006. Low-calcium flyash-based geopolymer concrete: long-term properties. Faculty of Engineering Curtin University of Technology Perth, Research Report GC-2.
   Google Scholar