A critical review of high polymer-modified asphalt binders and mixtures

References

• AASHTO R84, 2010. Standard practice for developing dynamic modulus master curves for Hot Mix asphalt (HMA) using the asphalt mixture performance tester (AMPT). Washington, D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO T283, 2014. Standard method of test for resistance of compacted asphalt mixtures to moisture-induced damage. Washington, D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO T313, 2012. Standard method of test for determining the flexural creep stiffness of asphalt binder using the bending beam rheometer (BBR). Washington, D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO T315, 2010. Standard method of test for determining the rheological properties of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer (DSR). Washington, D.C.: Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO T321, 2014. Standard method of test for determining the fatigue life of compacted asphalt mixtures subjected to repeated flexural bending. Washington, D.C.: Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO T322, 2007. Standard method of test for determining the creep compliance and strength of Hot Mix asphalt (HMA) using the indirect tensile test device. Washington, D.C.: Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO T340, 2010. Standard method of test for determining rutting susceptibility of Hot Mix asphalt (HMA) using the asphalt pavement analyzer (APA). Washington, D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO T378, 2013. Determining the dynamic modulus and flow number for Hot Mix asphalt (HMA) using the asphalt mixture performance tester (AMPT). Washington, D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO TP10, 1993. Standard test method for thermal stress restrained specimen tensile strength. Washington, D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• American Association for State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), 1993. AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures, Washington, D.C., ISBN 1-56051-055-2, Copyright, 1986, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• American Association for State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Transportation System Preservation Technical Services Program (TSP2), 2012. Kraton Ultr-thin HMA / WMA Overlay Study, http://www.tsp2.org/pavement/other-information/research-pavement/ [Accessed 5 July 2012].
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D7405, 2008. Standard test method for multiple stress creep and recovery (MSCR) of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer (DSR). West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials.
   Google Scholar
• Blazejowski, K., Olszacki, J., and Peciakowski, H, 2015. Highly Modified Binders Orbiton HiMA, ORLEN Asfalt, Application Guide, Version 1e, Poland, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), 2018. Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, January 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Fournier, P., 2010. Georgia DOT Chooses Highly Modified Asphalt for Busy Intersection, Dixie Contactor Edition, Volume 84, Number 10, October 2010, kraton.com/products/hima/documents/DXC%20Oct2010_feature2%20(2).pdf [Accessed 1 October 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Fournier, P, 2012. Oregon Tries Advanced Pavement Overlay, Asphalt Review, Roads, Pacific Builder and Engineer, Volume 118, Number 8, August 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Fournier, P, 2013. New Pavement Technologies Tried in Twin Cities, Asphalt Review, Roads, published by the Australian Asphalt Pavement Association, Volume 103, Number 4, April 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J., Chun, S., and Choubane, B., 2014. Evaluation and Implementation of a Heavy Polymer Modified Asphalt Binder Through Accelerated Pavement Testing, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), State Materials Office, Research Report Number FL/DOT/SMO/14-564, February 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT), 2005. Polymer-Modified Hot Mix Asphalt, Bureau of Materials and Physical Research, Pavement Technology Advisory, Design, Construction and Materials, PTA-B%, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Kuennen, T., 2012. Oklahoma Anticipates I-40 Performance Gain with HMA, www.theasphaltpro.com, Asphalt Pro, June/July 2012, p. 38–43.
   Google Scholar
• Kuennen, T., 2015. Winning the Race Track Challenge, Asphalt Pavement Magazine, Published by the National Asphalt Pavement Association, Volume 20, Number 6, November/December 2015, p. 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Mogawer, W. S., 2014. Material and Mixture Test Results, Transportation New Hampshire DOT Highways for Life Project, 2011 Auburn-Candia Resurfacing, University of Massachusetts, Highway Sustainability research Center (HRSC), April 11, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Mogawer, W. S., et al., 2014. Development and Validation of Performance Based Specifications for High Performance Thin Overlay Mix, Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Circular, Number E-C189, p. 52-68, October 2014.
   Google Scholar
• NHDOT, 2014. Flexible Pavement Analysis, Highway Design manual, New Hampshire Department of Transportation, Appendix 7-1, November 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Sebaaly, P. E., Bazi, G. M, and Vivekanathan, Y., 2003. Evaluation of New Pavement Technologies in Nevada, Report No. RDT-03-034, Western Regional Superpave Center, university of Nevada, Reno, March 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Siddharthan, R.V., et al., 2015. Formulation and Application of 3D-Move: A dynamic Pavement Analysis Program, Report FHWA-RD-WRSC-UNR-201506, Western Regional Superpave Center, University of Nevada, Reno, June 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K., 2012. Kraton’s HiMA Trials in Brazil, Asphalt Paving, Reproduced by kind permission of World Highways, Route One Publishing, September 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Tex-248-F, 2014. Overlay test. Austin, TX: Test Procedure for Texas Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Timm, D.H., et al., 2012. Field and Laboratory Study of High-Polymer Mixtures at the NCAT Test Track, Interim Report, Report No. 12-08, National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn University, August 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Timm, D.H., and Peters-Davis, K., 2009. Recalibration of the Asphalt Layer Coefficient, Report No.09-03, National Center for Asphalt Technology, Auburn University, August 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, C., 2015. Evaluation of Thermal Oxidative Aging Effect on the Rheological Performance of Modified Asphalt Binders, Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, December 2015.
   Google Scholar