Effects of different bitumen modifiers on the rutting and cracking resistance of hot mix asphalts

References

• AASHTO R30-02, 2002. Mixture conditioning of hot mix asphalt. Standard specification for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Airey, G.D., 2004. Styrene butadiene styrene polymer modification of road bitumens. Journal of Materials Science, 39, 951–959. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), 2002. doi: 10.1023/B:JMSC.0000012927.00747.83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahia, H.U., et al., 2001. Characterization of modified asphalt binders in superpave mix design. Natıonal Cooperatıve Hıghway Research Program, NCHRP 459.
   Google Scholar
• Bardesi, A. and Brule, B., 1999. Use of modified bituminous binders, special bitumens and bitumens with additives in road pavements. World Road Association (PIARC), 118–120.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L., Qian, Z., and Lu, Q., 2014. Crack initiation and propagation in epoxy asphalt concrete in the three-point bending test. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 15 (3), 507–520. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2014.908132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Standard, 2003. EN 12697-22, Bituminous mixtures-Test methods for hot mix asphalt. Wheel tracking.
   Google Scholar
• European Standard, 2003. EN 12697-33, Bituminous mixtures-Test methods for hot mix asphalt. Specimen prepared by roller compactor.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, H., et al., 2007. Storage stability and compatibility of asphalt binder modified by SBS graft copolymer. Construction and Building Materials, 21 (7), 1528–1533. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganjei, M.A. and Aflaki, E., 2018. Application of nano-silica and styrene-butadiene-styrene to improve asphalt mixture self-healing. International journal of Pavement Engineering, doi:10.1080/10298436.2016.1260130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Görkem, Ç. and Şengöz, B., 2009. Predicting stripping and moisture induced damage of asphalt concrete prepared with polymer modified bitumen and hydrated lime. Construction and Building Materials, 23, 2227–2236. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamidi, H., 1998. Stiffness modulus and permanent deformation characteristics of asphalt mix containing Gilsonite. MSc Thesis. Bandung Technology Institute, Bandung.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y.H., 2004. Pavement analysis and design (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y.H., Drnevich, V.P., and Roghani, H., 1994. Prediction of Fatigue cracking and rutting in asphalt pavements by small-scale centrifuge models. Strategic Highway Research Program, SHRP-ID/UFR-91-516. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Jahanian, H.R., et al., 2017. Performance evaluation of hot mix asphalt (HMA) containing bitumen modified with Gilsonite. Construction and Building Materials, 131, 156–164. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javilla, B., et al., 2017. Significance of initial rutting in prediction of rutting development and characterization of asphalt mixtures. Construction and Building Materials, 153, 157–164. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karakas, A.S., et al., 2015. The evaluation of the field performance of the neat and SBS modified hot mixture asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, 98, 678–684. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kök, B.V. and Yılmaz, M., 2009. The effects of using lime and styrene–butadiene–styrene on moisture sensitivity resistance of hot mix asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, 23, 1999–2006. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, R., et al., 2015. Experimental study on aging properties and modification mechanism of Trinidad Lake asphalt modified bitumen. Construction and Building Materials, 101, 878–883. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X. and Marasteanu, M.O., 2004. Evaluation of the low temperature fracture resistance of asphalt mixtures using the semi-circular bend test. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologist, 73, 401–426.
   Google Scholar
• Liao, M.C., et al., 2014. Rheological behavior of bitumen mixed with Trinidad Lake asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, 66, 361–367. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J. and Li, P., 2008. Experimental study on Gilsonite-modified asphalt. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Airfield and Highway Pavement Specialty Conference, Washington, DC, 222–228.
   Google Scholar
• McGennis, R.B., et al., 1995. Background of Superpave Asphalt Mixture Design and Analysis. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, FHWA-SA-95-003, 172 p., Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, F. and Rubio, M.C., 2013. Effect of aggregate nature on the fatigue-cracking behaviour of asphalt mixes. Materials and Design, 47, 61–67. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasrekani, A.A., et al., 2016. High-temperature performance of Gilsonite-modified asphalt binder and asphalt concrete. Petroleum Science and Technology, 34, 1783–1789. doi: 10.1080/10916466.2016.1230750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nciri, S., et al., 2014. Chemical characterization of Gilsonite bitumen. Journal of Petroleum and Environmental Biotechnology, 5 (5), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Nciri, S. and Cho, N., 2017. Structural comparison of Gilsonite and Trinidad Lake Asphalt using 13C-NMR technique. In: 17–19 March 2017 IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2nd International Conference on Mining, Material and Metallurgical Engineering, Bangkok, Thailand.
   Google Scholar
• Özen, H., 2011. Rutting evaluation of hydrated lime and SBS modified asphalt mixtures for laboratory and field compacted samples. Construction and Building Materials, 25, 756–765. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, J.M., 1999. New method for measuring crack propagation in asphalts. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 1, 15–34. doi: 10.1080/10298439908901694
   Google Scholar
• Ruixia, L., et al., 2015. Rheological and low temperature properties of asphalt composites containing rock asphalts. Construction and Building Materials, 96, 47–54. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santagata, E., et al., 2017. Correlating creep properties of bituminous binders with anti-rutting performance of corresponding mixtures. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 10, 38–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijprt.2016.11.008
   Google Scholar
• Shirini, B. and Imaninasab, R., 2016. Performance evaluation of rubberized and SBS modified porous asphalt mixtures. Construction and Building Materials, 107, 165–171. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Słowik, M. and Bilski, M., 2017. An experimental study of the impact of aging on Gilsonite and Trinidad Epuré modified asphalt binders properties. Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering, 12, 71–81. doi: 10.3846/bjrbe.2017.09
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Specht, L.P., et al., 2017. Application of the theory of viscoelasticity to evaluate the resilient modulus test in asphalt mixes. Construction and Building Materials, 149, 648–658. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topal, A., 2010. Evaluation of the properties and microstructure of plastomeric polymer modified bitumens. Fuel Processing Technology, 91, 45–51. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.08.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walubita, L.F., et al., 2010. New generation mix-designs: laboratory testing and construction of the apt test sections. FHWA/TX-10/0-6132-1, 180 p., Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X., et al., 2018, Study on durability of high-modulus asphalt mixture based on TLA and fibre composite modification technology, International Journal of Pavement Engineering, doi:10.1080/10298436.2016.1224411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Sun, L., and Zhou, J., 2017. Pavement performance evaluation of recycled styrene–butadiene–styrene-modified asphalt mixture. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 18, 404–413. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2015.1095296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widyatmoko, I. and Elliott, R., 2008. Characteristics of elastomeric and plastomeric binders in contact with Natural Asphalts. Construction and Building Materials, 22, 239–249. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.12.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, M. and Çeloğlu, M.E., 2013. Effects of SBS and different natural asphalts on the properties of bituminous binders and mixtures. Construction and Building Materials, 44, 533–540. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, M., Kok, B.V., and Kuloglu, N., 2013. Investigation of mechanical properties of short- and long-term aged asphaltite modified asphalt mixtures. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 25 (5), 563–572. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., et al., 2013. Development of a failure criterion for asphalt mixtures under fatigue loading. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 14, 1–15. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2013.812843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar