Strain recovery rate and absolute per cent recovery of polymer-modified asphalt binders

References

• AASHTO:M323, 2013. Standard specification for superpave volumetric mix design. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO-M-332, 2014. Standard specification for performance-graded asphalt binder using Multiple Stress Creep Recovery (MSCR) test. Washington, DC: AASHTO.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO:TP63, 2007. Standard method of test for determining rutting susceptibility of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) using the Asphalt Pavement Analyzer (APA). Washington, DC: AASHTO.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Abdul Wahhab, H.I., Dalhat, M.A., and Habib, M.A., 2017. Storage stability and high-temperature performance of asphalt binder modified with recycled plastic. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 18 (5), 1117–1134. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2016.1207554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastos, J.B.S., Babadopulos, L.F.A.L., and Soares, J.B., 2017. Relationship between multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) binder test results and asphalt concrete rutting resistance in Brazilian roadways. Construction and Building Materials, 145 (Suppl. C), 20–27. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choubane, B., Page, G., and Musselman, J., 2000. Suitability of asphalt pavement analyzer for predicting pavement rutting. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1723, 107–115. doi: 10.3141/1723-14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalhat, M.A. and Al-Abdul Wahhab, H.I., 2017. Performance of recycled plastic waste modified asphalt binder in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 18 (4), 349–357. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2015.1088150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diab, A. and You, Z., 2017. Small and large strain rheological characterizations of polymer- and crumb rubber-modified asphalt binders. Construction and Building Materials, 144 (Suppl. C), 168–177. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domingos, M.D.I. and Faxina, A.L., 2015. Rheological behaviour of bitumens modified with PE and PPA at different MSCR creep–recovery times. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 16 (9), 771–783. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2014.953503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domingos, M.D.I. and Faxina, A.L., 2016. Susceptibility of asphalt binders to rutting: literature review. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 28 (2), 04015134. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domingos, M.D.I., Faxina, A.L., and Bernucci, L.L.B., 2017. Characterization of the rutting potential of modified asphalt binders and its correlation with the mixture’s rut resistance. Construction and Building Materials, 144 (Suppl. C), 207–213. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuBois, E., Mehta, D.Y., and Nolan, A., 2014. Correlation between multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) results and polymer modification of binder. Construction and Building Materials, 65 (Suppl. C), 184–190. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, W. and Tang, N., 2015. Characterizing SBS modified asphalt with sulfur using multiple stress creep recovery test. Construction and Building Materials, 93 (Suppl. C), 514–521. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.06.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, N.M. and Baldwin, C.D., 2000. Assessing the relative rutting susceptibility of HMA in the laboratory with the asphalt pavement analyzer. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 1 (3), 203–217. doi: 10.1080/10298430008901706
   Google Scholar
• Kandhal, P.S. and Cooley, L.A. Jr., 2003. Accelerated laboratory rutting tests: evaluation of the asphalt pavement analyzer (NCHRP report 508). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Academy Press. Available from: https://trid.trb.org/view/682288
   Google Scholar
• Rushing, J.F. and Garg, N., 2017. Using the asphalt pavement analyzer as a mixture performance test to select appropriate binder grades for airport pavements. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, 143 (3), 04017010. doi: 10.1061/JPEODX.0000012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saboo, N. and Kumar, P., 2015. A study on creep and recovery behavior of asphalt binders. Construction and Building Materials, 96 (Suppl. C), 632–640. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santagata, E., et al., 2013. Evaluation of the anti-rutting potential of polymer-modified binders by means of creep-recovery shear tests. Materials and Structures, 46 (10), 1673–1682. doi: 10.1617/s11527-012-0006-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santagata, E., et al., 2015. A novel procedure for the evaluation of anti-rutting potential of asphalt binders. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 16 (4), 287–296. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2014.942859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenoy, A., 2008. Nonrecovered compliance from dynamic oscillatory test vis-à-vis nonrecovered compliance from multiple stress creep recovery test in the dynamic shear rheometer. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 9 (5), 329–341. doi: 10.1080/10298430701635095
   Google Scholar
• Shirodkar, P., et al., 2012. Characterization of creep and recovery curve of polymer modified binder. Construction and Building Materials, 34 (Suppl. C), 504–511. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soenen, H., et al., 2013. The multiple stress creep-recovery test: a detailed analysis of repeatability and reproducibility. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 14 (Suppl. 1), 2–11. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2013.774742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tram, N., et al., 2009. Evaluation of AASHTO rut test procedure using the asphalt pavement analyzer. Asphalt Paving Technology, 78, 24. Minneapolis, MN: Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists (AAPT).
   Google Scholar
• Wasage, T.L.J., Stastna, J., and Zanzotto, L., 2011. Rheological analysis of multi-stress creep recovery (MSCR) test. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 12 (6), 561–568. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2011.573557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, G., 2017a. Grading highly modified binders by multiple stress creep recovery. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 18 (6), 1322–1337. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2016.1212730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, G., 2017b. Shear creep response of an airport asphalt mastic. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 18 (7), 567–577. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2015.1095914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zar, J.H., 2005. Spearman rank correlation. In: P. Armitage and T. Colton, eds. Encyclopedia of biostatistics. doi: 10.1002/0470011815.b2a15150
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J.L., Cooley, J., and Kandhal, P., 2002. Comparison of fundamental and simulative test methods for evaluating permanent deformation of hot-mix asphalt. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1789, 91–100. doi: 10.3141/1789-10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoorob, S.E., et al., 2012. Investigating the multiple stress creep recovery bitumen characterisation test. Construction and Building Materials, 30 (Suppl. C), 734–745. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar