363
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Generalised clusterwise regression for simultaneous estimation of optimal pavement clusters and performance models

, ORCID Icon &
Pages 1122-1134 | Received 02 Jan 2017, Accepted 05 Sep 2018, Published online: 19 Sep 2018

References

  • Abaza, K.A., 2004. Deterministic performance prediction model for rehabilitation and management of flexible pavement. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 5 (2), 111–121. doi:10.1080/10298430412331286977.
  • Aguiar-Moya, J.P., and Prozzi, J., 2011. Development Of Reliable Pavement Models. Report No. SWUTC/11/161025-1, Texas Transportation Institute Texas, A&M University System, Texas. Available from: http://static.tti.tamu.edu/swutc.tamu.edu/publications/technicalreports/161025-1.pdf [Accessed 4 December 2016).
  • Ali, O., 2005. Evaluation of the Mechanistic Empirical Pavement Design Guide (NCHRP 1- 37 A). National Research Council Canada. doi:http://doi.org/10.4224/20377776.
  • Attoh-Okine, N., 1999. Analysis of learning rate and momentum term in backpropagation neural network algorithm trained to predict pavement performance, Advances in Engineering Software, 30 (4), 291–302.
  • Attoh-Okine, N., and Adarkwa, O., 2013. Pavement condition surveys –overview of current practices. Delaware Center for Transportation, 245, 1–66.
  • Attoh-Okine, N., Coogerb, K., and Mensaha, S., 2009. Multivariate adaptive regression (MARS) and hinged hyperplanes (HHP) for doweled pavement performance modelling, Construction and Building Materials, 23 (9), 3020–3023.
  • Bardaka, E., Labi, S., and Haddock, J.E., 2014. Using Enhanced Econometric Techniques to Verify the Service Life of Asset Intervention A Case Study for Indiana. Transportation Research Record 2431, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 16–23.
  • Bekheet, W., et al., 2008. Comparison between probabilistic and deterministic pavement management analysis: a case study for Arizona DOT. In: 7th International Conference on Managing Pavement Assets, 23–28 June 2008 Alberta, Canada.
  • Chan, P., Oppermann, M., and Wu, S.S., 1997. North Carolina's Experience in Development of Pavement Performance Prediction and Modeling.  Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1592, 80–88. doi:10.3141/1592-10.
  • Chen, D., et al., 2014. Development and Validation of Pavement Deterioration Models and Analysis Weight Factors for the NCDOT Pavement Management System. FHWA/NC/2011-01_Phse II, NCDOT, Raleigh, NC. Available from: https://connect.ncdot.gov/projects/planning/RNAProjDocs/2011-01-Phase%20II_Final%20Report.pdf. [Accessed 7 October 2017].
  • Chen, D., and Mastin, N., 2016. Sigmoidal models for predicting pavement performance conditions. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities., 30 (4), 04015078. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000833.
  • Darter, M.I., 1980. Requirements for Reliable Predictive Pavement Models. Transportation Research Record 766, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 25–31.
  • de Melo Silva, F., et al., 2000. Proposed Pavement Performance Models for Local Government Agencies in Michigan. Transportation Research Record 1699, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 81–86. doi:10.3141/1699-11.
  • DeSarbo, W.S., and Cron, W.L., 1988. A maximum likelihood methodology for clusterwise linear regression. Journal of Classification, 5, 249–282.
  • DeSarbo, W.S., Oliver, R.L., and Rangaswamy, A., 1989. A simulated annealing methodology for clusterwise linear regression. Psychometrika, 54 (4), 707–736.
  • Efron, B., 1979. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife, Annals of Statistics, 7(1), 1–26.
  • Efron, B., and Tibshirani, R.J., 1993. An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York.
  • Fox, J., and Monette, G., 1992. Generalized collinearity diagnostics, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87 (417), 178–183.
  • Garcia-Diaz, A., and Riggins, M., 1984. Serviceability and Distress Methodology for Predicting Pavement Performance. Transportation Research Record 997, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 56-61.
  • George, K.P., et al., 1989. Models for predicting pavement deterioration. Transportation Research Record 1215, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1–7.
  • Ghahramani, Z., 2013. Bayesian non-parametrics and the probabilistic approach to modelling, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 371: 20110553. doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0553.
  • Gharaibeh, N., et al., 2012. Evaluation and development of pavement scores, performance models and needs estimates for the TXDOT pavement management information system–final report. Report. FHWA/TX- 12/0-6386-3. Available from: https://static.tti.tamu.edu/tti.tamu.edu/documents/0-6386-3.pdf [Accessed 10 July 2017]
  • Hand, A.J., Seebaly, P.E., and Epps, J.A., 1999. Development of Performance Models Based on Department of Transportation Pavement Management System Data. Transportation Research Record 1684, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 215–222.
  • Highway Research Board, 1962. The AASHO road test. special Rep. No. 61A-E, National Academy of Science, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
  • Hong, F., and Prozzi, J., 2006. Estimation of pavement performance deterioration using Bayesian approach. Journal of Infrastructure Systems., 12 (2), 77–86. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2006)12:2(77).
  • Hong, F., and Prozzi, J., 2010. Roughness model accounting for heterogeneity based on In-service pavement performance data. Journal of Transportation Engineering., 136 (3), 205–213. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2010)136:3(205)
  • Hsu, D., 2015. Comparison of integrated clustering methods for accurate and stable prediction of building energy consumption data. Applied Energy, 160, 153–163.
  • Huang, Y.H., 2003. Pavement analysis and design, 2nd ed. Prentice Hall, Inc. New Jersey.
  • Hudson, W.R., Haas, R., and Perrone, E., 2015. Measures of Pavement Performance must consider the Road User. In: 9th International Conference on Managing Pavement Assets, 18–21 May 2015 Alexandria, VA.
  • Johnson, D.S., et al., 1989. Optimization by simulated annealing: An experimental evaluation, part I, graph partitioning. Journal Operations Research, 37 (6), 865–892.
  • Kang, C., and Ghosal, S., 2008. Clusterwise regression using dirichlet process mixtures. Statistical Science and Interdisciplinary Research, Vol. 4, Advances in Multivariate Statistical Methods, 305–325.
  • Kay, R.K., Mahoney, J.P., and Jackson, N.C., 1993. The WSDOT Pavement Management System – A 1993 Update. Technical Rep. WA-RD 274.1, Washington State Dept. of Transportation, Olympia, WA.
  • Khadka, M., and Paz, A., 2017a. Comprehensive clusterwise linear regression for pavement management systems. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, 143 (4), 04017014 (1–13).
  • Khadka, M., and Paz, A., 2017b. Estimation of optimal pavement performance models for highways. In: A. Loizos, I. Al-Qadi, and T. Scarpas, eds. 10th international conference on the bearing capacity of roads, railways and airfields, 28–30 June 2017 London: CRC Press.
  • Khatta, M.J., et al., 2008. Review of Louisiana’s pavement management system—Phase I. Transportation Research Record 2084, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 18–27.
  • Kodinariya, T.M., and Makwana, P.R., 2013. Review on determining number of cluster in k-means clustering. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Management Studies, 1 (6), 90–95.
  • Li, Z., 2005. A probabilistic and adaptive approach to modeling performance of pavement infrastructure. Thesis (PhD). University of Texas at Austin.
  • Li, N., Hass, R., and Xie, W.C., 1997. Investigation of Relationship Between Deterministic and Probabilistic Prediction Models in Pavement Management. Transportation Research Record 1592, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 70–79, doi:10.3141/1592-09.
  • Luo, Z., and Chou, E.Y., 2006. Pavement Condition Prediction Using Clusterwise Regression. Transportation Research Record 1974, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 70–77, doi:10.3141/1974-11.
  • Luo, Z., and Yin, H., 2008. Probabilistic Analysis of Pavement Distress Ratings with the Clusterwise Regression Method. Transportation Research Record 2084, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 38–46, doi:10.3141/2084-05.
  • Lytton, R.L., 1987. Concepts of Pavement Performance Prediction and Modeling. In: Second North American Conference on Managing Pavements, Canada, Vol. 2, Nov. 1987, pp. 2.3–2.20.
  • Madanat, S., et al., 2008. Development of Empirical-Mechanistic Pavement Performance Models using Data from the Washington State PMS Database. Research Report UCPRC-RR-2005-05, Univ. of Cal., Davis and Berkeley, Available from: http://www.dot.ca.gov/newtech/researchreports/reports/2008/ucprc-rr-2005-05.pdf [Accessed 15 December 2016].
  • Marler, R., and Arora, J., 2004. Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 26, 369–395.
  • Meneses, S., and Ferreira, A., 2013. Pavement maintenance programming considering two objectives: maintenance costs and user costs. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 14 (2), 206–221, doi:10.1080/10298436.2012.727994.
  • Nakamura, V.F., and Michael, H.L., 1963. Serviceability ratings of highway pavements. In: Highway research record 40, Highway Research Board, Washington, DC, 1–36.
  • Nevada Department of Transportation, 2011. Pavement management system overview. material division, Carson City, Nevada.
  • Park, M.W., and Kim, Y.D., 1998. A systematic procedure for setting parameters in simulated annealing algorithms. Computers & Operations Research, 25 (3), 207–217.
  • Paz, A., et al., 2015a. Calibration of traffic flow models using a memetic algorithm. Transportation Research Part-C: Emerging Technologies, 55, 432–443.
  • Paz, A., Molano, V., and Sanchez, M., 2015b. Holistic calibration of microscopic traffic flow models: methodology and real world application studies. In: N. Lagaros and M. Papadrakakis, eds. Engineering and Applied Sciences Optimization. Computational Methods in Applied Sciences, vol. 38, Cham: Springer.
  • Prozzi, J.A., and Madanat, S.M., 2003. Incremental nonlinear model for predicting pavement serviceability. Journal of Transportation Engineering., 129 (6), 635–641. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2003)129:6(635).
  • Prozzi, J. A., and Madanat, S.M., 2004. Development of pavement performance models by combining experimental and field data. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 10 (1), 9–22.
  • Rajagopal, A., 2006. Developing Pavement performance prediction models and decision trees for the City of Cincinnati. FHWA/OH-2006/14, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH.
  • R Core Team, 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing, Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from: Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.http://www.R-project.org [Accessed 11 November 2016].
  • Reza, F., Boriboonsomsin, K., and Bazlamit, S.M., 2005. Development of a Composite Pavement Performance Index. Report No. ST/SS/05-001. Department of Civil Engineering Ohio Northern University Ada, Ohio.
  • Sadek, A.W., Freeman, T.E., and Demetsky, M.J., 1996. Deterioration Prediction Modeling of Virginia’s Interstate Highway System. Transportation Research Record 1524, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 118–129, doi:10.3141/1524-14.
  • Salama, H., Chatti, K., and Lyles, R., 2006. Effect of heavy multiple axle trucks on flexible pavement damage using In-service pavement performance data. Journal of Transportation Engineering., 132 (10), 763–770.
  • Saraf, C.L., and Majizzadeh, K., 1992. Distress prediction models for a network level PMS. Transportation Research Record, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1344, 38–48.
  • Schmitt, R.L., Owusu-Ababio, S., and Denn, K.D., 2008. Database Development for an HMA Pavement Performance Analysis System. Report No. 07-11, University of Wisconsin-Madison. Available from: http://wisconsindot.gov/documents2/research/06-13hmadatabase-f.pdf [Accessed 15 December 2016].
  • Schwarz, G., 1978. Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6 (2), 461–464.
  • Selim, S.Z., and Alsultan, K., 1991. A simulated annealing algorithm for the clustering problem. Pattern Recognition, 24 (10), 1003–1008.
  • Shekharan, A.R., 2000. Solution of pavement deterioration equations by genetic algorithms. Transportation Research Record 1699, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 101–106, doi:10.3141/1699-14.
  • Shoukry, S.N., Martinelli, D.R., and Reigle, J.A., 1997. Universal pavement distress evaluator based on fuzzy sets, Transportation Research Record 1592, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 180–186.
  • Sun, L.X. et al., 1994. Cluster analysis by simulated annealing. Computers & Chemistry, 18 (2), 103–108.
  • Terzi, S., 2006. Modeling the pavement present serviceability index of flexible highway pavements using data mining. Journal of Applied Sciences, 6 (1), 193–197.
  • van der Merwe, D.W., and Engelbrecht, A.P., 2003. Data clustering using particle swarm optimization. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation 2003 (CEC 2003), Canbella, Australia, 215–220. doi:10.1109/CEC.2003.1299577.
  • Wolters, A.S., and Zimmerman, K.A., 2010. Research of Current practices in pavement performance modeling. FHWA –PA-2010-007-080307, PennDOT, Harrisburg, PA. Available from: http://ntl.bts.gov/lib/32000/32900/32969/Research_of_Current_Practices_in_Pavement_Performance_Modeling.pdf [ Accessed 12 December 2016].
  • Yang, J., Lu, J.J., and Gunaratne, M., 2003. Application of neural network models for forecasting pavement crack index and pavement condition rating. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida, Florida. Available from: http://www.fdot.gov/research/completed_proj/summary_smo/fdot_bc353_13rpt.pdf [Accessed 15 November 2017].
  • Zhang, W., and Durango-Cohen, P., 2014. Explaining heterogeneity in pavement deterioration: clusterwise linear regression model. Journal of Infrastructure Systems., 20 (2), 04014005. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000182.
  • Zhang, Z., Singh, N., and Hudson, W.R., 1993. Comprehensive ranking index for flexible pavement using fuzzy sets model. Transportation Research Records 1397, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 96–102.
  • Zheng, L., 2005. A probabilistic and adaptive approach to modeling performance of pavement infrastructure. Thesis (PhD). The University of Texas at Austin.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.