Approaches for local calibration of mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide joint faulting model: a case study of Ontario

References

• AASHTO, 1993. Guide for design of pavement structures. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO, 2008. Mechanistic-Empirical pavement design guide-A manual of practice. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO, 2010. Guide for the local calibration of the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO, 2011. Software help system Darwin-ME mechanistic-empirical pavement design software. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO, 2013. AASHTOWare pavement ME design user™ manual. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. E., et al., 2016. Local calibration of cracking models in MEPDG for Ontario’s flexible pavement. TAC 2016: Efficient Transportation-Managing the Demand-2016 Conference and Exhibition of the Transportation Association of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• ARA, Inc., 2004. Guide for mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures. Champaign, Illinois: National Cooperative Highway Research Program.
   Google Scholar
• Ayed, A. and Tighe, S. L., 2015. Local calibration for mechanistic-empirical design using genetic algorithm. Ottawa: Transportation Association of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Barati, R, 2013. Application of excel solver for parameter estimation of the nonlinear muskingum models. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 17 (5), 1139–1148. doi: 10.1007/s12205-013-0037-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baus, R. L., and Stires, N. R, 2010. Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide implementation (No. FHWA-SC-10-01).
   Google Scholar
• Brink, W. C., 2015. Use of statistical resampling techniques for the local calibration of the pavement performance prediction models. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Michigan State University.
   Google Scholar
• Ceylan, H., et al., 2013. Iowa calibration of MEPDG performance prediction models. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University.
   Google Scholar
• Darter, M. I., et al., 2014. Calibration and implementation of the AASHTO mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide in Arizona (No. FHWA-AZ-14-606).
   Google Scholar
• Darter, M. I., Titus-Glover, L., and Von Quintus, 2009. Implementation of the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide in utah: validation, calibration, and development of the UDOT MEPDG user’s guide. Champaign, Illinois: ARA, Inc. Report no. UT-09.11.
   Google Scholar
• Fernando, E.G, Oh, J., and Ryu, D, 2007. Phase 1 of MEPDG program implementation in Florida. Texas Transportation Institute Report D04491/PR15281-1. College Station TX.
   Google Scholar
• FHWA, 2010a. Local calibration of the MEPDG using pavement management. Final Rep. for FHWA Project DTFH61-07-R-00143, Vol. I, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• FHWA, 2010b. Local calibration of the MEPDG using pavement management. Final Rep. for FHWA Project DTFH61-07-R-00143, Vol. II, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Gautam, G. P., et al., 2016. Local calibration of the MEPDG rutting models for ontario’s flexible roads: recent findings. Transportation research board 95th annual meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Gulfam, E. J., 2017. Developing cost-effective pavement maintenance and rehabilitation schedules: application of mepdg-based distress models and key performance index. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Waterloo.
   Google Scholar
• Gulfam, E. J. and Tighe, S. L., 2016. An experimental design-based evaluation of sensitivities of MEPDG prediction: investigating main and interaction effects. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 17 (7), 615–625. doi:10.1080/10298436.2015.1007238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haider, P. S. W., Brink, W. C., and Buch, N., 2016. Local calibration of flexible pavement performance models in michigan. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 43 (11), 986–997. doi:10.1139/cjce-2015-0556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haider, S. W., Brink, W. C., and Buch, N., 2017. Local calibration of rigid pavement performance models using resampling methods. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 18, 1–13. doi:10.1080/10298436.2015.1121777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamdi, A., 2015. Local calibration of AASHTOWare® using ontario pavement management system data PMS2. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Waterloo.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, A., Sullivan, S., and Hein, D., 2011. Life cycle cost analysis of municipal pavements in southern and eastern Ontario. In 2011 Conference and Exhibition of the Transportation Association of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Hsie, M., et al., 2012. Modeling asphalt pavement overlay transverse cracks using the genetic operation tree and levenberg–marquardt method. Expert Systems with Applications, 39 (5), 4874–4881. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya, O., et al., 2016. Optimization of local calibration coefficients of AASHTOWare pavement ME design jointed plain concrete pavement performance models. In Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting (No. 16-4138).
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., et al., 2010. Use of pavement management information system for verification of mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide performance predictions. Transportation Research Record 2153: 30–39. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., et al., 2014. Calibration of pavement ME design and mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide performance prediction models for iowa pavement systems. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 140 (10), 04014052. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenberg, K, 1944. A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 2 (2), 164–168. doi: 10.1090/qam/10666
   Google Scholar
• Li, J., et al., 2011a. Use of the 1993 AASHTO guide, MEPDG and historical performance to update the WSDOT Pavement Design Catalog (No. WA-RD 779.1).
   Google Scholar
• Li, Q., et al., 2011b. Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide (MEPDG): a bird’s-eye view. Journal of Modern Transportation, 19 (2), 114–133. doi: 10.1007/BF03325749
   Google Scholar
• Mallela, J., et al., 2009. Implementing the AASHTO mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide in Missouri volume II: MEPDG model validation and calibration. Jefferson, Missouri: Missouri Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Mallela, J., et al., 2013. Implementation of the AASHTO mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide for Colorado (No. CDOT-2013-4).
   Google Scholar
• Marquardt, D. W, 1963. An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 11 (2), 431–441. doi: 10.1137/0111030
   Google Scholar
• MTO, 1998. Construction specification for concrete pavement and concrete base. Toronto: Ministry of Transportation, Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Mu, F., et al., 2012. An evaluation of JPCP faulting and transverse cracking models of the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 13 (1), 128–141. doi:10.1080/14680629.2011.644179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCHRP, 2004. Guide for mechanistic-empirical design of New and rehabilitated pavement structures. National Cooperative Highway Research Program 1-37A. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• NCHRP, 2005. Traffic data collection, analysis, and forecasting for mechanistic pavement design. National Cooperative Highway Research Program 01–39. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• NCHRP, 2006a. Independent review of the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide and software. research results digest 307. National Cooperative Highway Research Program 1-40 A. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• NCHRP, 2006b. Changes to the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide software through version 0.900-July, 2006. research results digest 308. National Cooperative Highway Research Program 1-40 D. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• NCHRP, 2009. Local calibration guidance for the recommended guide for mechanistic-empirical pavement design of New and rehabilitated pavement structures. National Cooperative Highway Research Program Project 1- 40B Report. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
   Google Scholar
• NCHRP, 2010. Models for predicting reflection cracking of Hot-Mix asphalt overlays. National Cooperative Highway Research Program Project 01-41 Report. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• NCHRP, 2011. Sensitivity evaluation of MEPDG performance prediction. National Cooperative Highway Research Program Project 01-47 Report. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• NCHRP, 2013. Guide for conducting forensic investigations of highway pavements. National Cooperative Highway Research Program Project 01-49 Report. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• NCHRP, 2014. Implementation of the AASHTO mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide and software: A synthesis of highway practice. National Cooperative Highway Research Program Project 20-05 Report. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• NCHRP, 2015. Consideration of preservation in pavement design and analysis procedures. National Cooperative Highway Research Program Project 01-48 Report. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Orobio, A. and Zaniewski, J. P., 2013. Sensitivity of the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide to traffic inputs: a space-filling approach. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 14 (3), 735–746. doi:10.1080/14680629.2013.816248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachs, S., Vandenbossche, J. M., and Snyder, M. B, 2015. Calibration of national rigid pavement performance models for the pavement mechanistic–empirical design guide. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2524, 59–67. doi: 10.3141/2524-06
   Google Scholar
• Schram, S., and Abdelrahman, M, 2006. Improving prediction accuracy in mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1947, 59–68. doi: 10.1177/0361198106194700106
   Google Scholar
• Tia, M., Verdugo, D., and Kwon, O., 2012. Evaluation of long-life concrete pavement practices for Use in florida. Gainesville: Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering University of Florida. (No. UF Project no. 00093785).
   Google Scholar
• Titus-Glover, L. and Mallela, J., 2009. Guidelines for implementing NCHRP 1-37A M-E design procedures in ohio volume 4 - MEPDG models validation and recalibration. Champaign, Illinois: ARA, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Tompkins, D., Johanneck, L., and Khazanovich, L., 2015. State design procedure for rigid pavements based on the AASHTO mechanistic–empirical pavement design guide. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2524, 23–32. doi:10.3141/2524-03.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenbossche, J. M., et al., 2012. Evaluating the continuously reinforced concrete pavement performance models of the mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 13 (2), 235–248. doi:10.1080/14680629.2012.688172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenbossche, J.M., Dufalla, N., and Li, Z, 2017. Bonded concrete overlay of asphalt mechanical-empirical design procedure. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 18 (11), 1004–1015. doi:10.1080/10298436.2016.1141410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velasquez, R., et al., 2009. Implementation of the MEPDG for New and rehabilitated pavement structures for design of concrete and asphalt pavements in minnesota. MN/RC 2009-06. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Von Quintus, H. L., et al., 2003. Jackknife testing - an experiment approach to refine model calibration and validation. Washington, DC: Research Results Digest 283, National Cooperative Highway Research Program.
   Google Scholar
• Von Quintus, H. L., Darter, M., and Mallela, J., 2007. Mechanistic empirical pavement design guide flexible pavement performance prediction models for montana. Saint Paul, Minnesota: Minnesota Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar