References
- Andriejauskas, T., et al., 2014. Evaluation of skid resistance characteristics and measurement methods. In: The 9th international conference “ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING”, 22-23.05. Vilnius, Lithuania.
- Do, M.-T., et al., 2013. Modeling of the connection road surface microtexture/water depth/friction. Wear, 302 (1–2), 1426–1435. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2013.01.031
- Čelko, J., Kováč, M., and Kotek, P., 2016. Analysis of the pavement surface texture by 3D scanner. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 2994–3003. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.434
- Fernando, E.G. Zimmer, R.A., and Mikhail, M., 2013. Comparative evaluation of locked-wheel and fixed-slip skid systems. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2369, 125–134. doi: 10.3141/2369-14
- Hall, J.W., et al., 2009. NCHRP Web Document 108: guide for pavement friction. Final report, NCHRP Project 01-43. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies.
- Kane, M. and Cerezo, V., 2015. A contribution to tire/road friction modeling: from a simplified dynamic frictional contact model to a “Dynamic Friction Tester” model. Wear, 342–343, 163–171. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2015.08.007
- Kargah-Ostadi, N. and Howard, A., 2015. Monitoring pavement surface macrotexture and friction case study. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2525, 111–117. doi: 10.3141/2525-12
- Kogbara, R.B., et al., 2016. A state-of-the-art review of parameters influencing measurement and modelling of skid resistance of asphalt pavements. Construction and Building Materials, 114, 602–617. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.002
- Li, S., et al., 2005. Identifying friction variations with the standard smooth tire for network pavement inventory friction testing. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1905, 157–165. doi: 10.1177/0361198105190500117
- Najafi, S., et al., 2017. Evaluation of repeatability and reproducibility of continuous friction measuring equipment (CFME) using cross-correlation. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 18 (6), 521–529. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2015.1095908
- Najafi, S., Flintsch, G.W., and McGhee K.K., 2013. Assessment of operational characteristics of continuous friction measuring equipment (CFME). International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 14 (8), 706–714. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2012.667097
- Rado, Z. and Kane, M., 2014. An initial attempt to develop an empirical relation between texture and pavement friction using the HHT approach. Wear, 309 (1–2), 233–246. doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2013.11.015
- Rado, Z. and Wambold, J.C., 2012. Why fixed slip devices Can not measure the speed gradient due to the pavement? In: 7th symposium on pavement surface characteristics: SURF 2012, 19-22.09. Norfolk, VA.
- Roe, P.G., et al., 1998. High and low speed skidding resistance: the influence of texture depth. TRL Report 367.
- ROSANNE a report D1.1.Definition of boundaries and requirements for the common scale for harmonisation of skid resistance measurements including draft standard outline.
- ROSANNE b report D1.2. Analysis of data from the first round of tests and initial development of the common scale.
- Scharnigg, K., et al., 2016. Cooperation in the field of skid resistance between Germany and the Netherlands. In: 6th eurasphalt & eurobitume congress, 1-3.06. Prague, Czech Republic.
- Wasilewska, M., et al., 2014. Assessment of skid resistance using DFTester and CTMeter. In: The 9th international conference “ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING”, 22-23.05. Vilnius, Lithuania.
- Wasilewska, M., Gardziejczyk, W., and Gierasimiuk, P., 2016. Evaluation of skid resistance using CTM, DFT and SRT-3 devices. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 3050–3059. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.449