Development of integrated railway ballast quality index

References

• Abadi, T., et al., 2016. A review and evaluation of ballast settlement models using results from the Southampton railway Testing Facility (SRTF). Procedia Engineering, 143, 999–1006. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.089
   Google Scholar
• Alva-Hurtado, J., and Selig, E., 1981. Survey of laboratory devices for measuring soil volume change. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 4 (1), 11–18. doi: 10.1520/GTJ10758J
   Google Scholar
• Andrew, A. L., Chu, K.-W. E., and Lancaster, P., 1993. Derivatives of eigenvalues and eigenvectors of matrix functions. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, 14 (4), 903–926. doi: 10.1137/0614061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AREMA, 2016. Roadway & Ballast. Manual of railway engineering, Vol. 1, Ch. 1, part 2. The American Railway Engineering and Maintenance of Way Association.
   Google Scholar
• AS2758, 2009. Aggregates and rock for engineering purposes. Part 7. Aggregate for Railway Ballast, Australian Standards.
   Google Scholar
• Bhanitiz, A, 2007. A laboratory study of railway ballast behaviour under traffic loading and tamping maintenance. Doctor Thesis. University of Nottingham, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Blott, S. J., and Pye, K., 2008. Particle shape: a review and new methods of characterization and classification. Sedimentology, 55 (1), 31–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozóki, S. and Rapcsák, T., 2008. On Saaty’s and Koczkodaj’s inconsistencies of pairwise comparison matrices. Journal of Global Optimization, 42 (2), 157–175. doi: 10.1007/s10898-007-9236-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifton, A., Klassen, M., and Watters, B.R., 1987. Production and testing of ballast. Transportation Research Record, 1131, 35–44.
   Google Scholar
• CPRailroad, 1984. CP Rail Specification for Ballast. Specificationfor Ballast, Canadian Pacific Railroad.
   Google Scholar
• Descantes, Y., Fosse, Y., and Milcent, F., 2006. Automated measurement of railway ballast angularity. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 18 (4), 612–618. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2006)18:4(612)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EN13450, 2015. Aggregates for railway ballast. British Standard.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, L., Fan, J., and Gu, A., 2000. The new discussion on the evaluation method and indexes of ballast quality for high-speed railway. Traffic and Transportation Studies, ASCE.
   Google Scholar
• Giannakos, K., Loizos, A., and Plati, C, 2014. Ballast specifications’ requirements related to ballast hardness and life-cycle. American Modern Traffic and Transportation Engineering Research, 3, 37–47.
   Google Scholar
• Greco, S., Figueira, J., and Ehrgott, M., 2016. Multiple criteria decision analysis. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Han, X., 1998. Evaluation of ballast materials based on ballast particle characteristics and functions. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Massachusetts Amherst.
   Google Scholar
• Han, X., and Selig, E., 1997. Effects of fouling on ballast settlement. Proceedings of 6th International Heavy Haul Railway Conference.
   Google Scholar
• IMRT, 2005. Railway track superstructure general technical specifications. IMRT Ministry Publication no. 301. Ballast specification, Iran.
   Google Scholar
• Indraratna, B., et al., 2010. Field assessment of the performance of a ballasted rail track with and without geosynthetics. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 136 (7), 907–917. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indraratna, B., Hussaini, S. K. K., and Vinod, J., 2011. On the shear behavior of ballast-geosynthetic interfaces. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 35 (2), 305–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indraratna, B., Lackenby, J., and Christie, D., 2005. Effect of confining pressure on the degradation of ballast under cyclic loading. Géotechnique, 55 (4), 325–328. doi: 10.1680/geot.2005.55.4.325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indraratna, B., Nimbalkar, S., and Christie, D., 2009. The performance of rail track incorporating the effects of ballast breakage, confining pressure and geosynthetic reinforcement. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Bearing Capacity of Roads, Railways and Airfields, Taylor and Francis Group, London.
   Google Scholar
• Indraratna, B., Rujikiatkamjorn, C., Vinod, J.S., et al., 2012. Behavior of fresh and fouled railway ballast subjected to direct shear testing: Discrete element simulation. International Journal of Geomechanics, 14 (1), 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1061/ doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumara, G., et al., 2012. Fundamental study on the simple evaluation methods for particle size distribution and maximum/minimum void ratio of sand-gravel mixtures. Advances in Transportation Geotechnics, 2, 115.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, W. L., 2004. Mechanics of railway ballast behaviour, University of Nottingham. PhD Thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Martineau, B, 2017. Formulation of a general gradation curve and its transformation to equivalent sigmoid form to represent grain size distribution. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 18 (1), 199–207. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2015.1124048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell, G. R., Lim, W. L., and Collop, A.C., 2003. Measuring the strength of railway ballast. Ground Engineering, 36 (1), 25–28.
   Google Scholar
• Meeker, L., and Warnock, D., 1993. Ballast testing research for quarries serving southern pacific lines. Engineering Geology and Geotechnical Engineering, 29, 169.
   Google Scholar
• Nålsund, R, 2014. Railway ballast characteristics, selection criterion and performance. Thesis (PhD). Department of Civil and Transport Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim.
   Google Scholar
• Praticò, F. G. and Giunta, M., 2017. Proposal of a key performance indicator for railway track based on LCC and RAMS analyses. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144 (2), 04017104. https://doi.org/10.1061/ doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, G. P., and Bathurst, R. J., 1994. Repeated-load response of aggregates in relation to track quality index. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 31 (4), 547–554. doi: 10.1139/t94-063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roszkowska, E, 2013. Rank ordering criteria weighting methods – a comparative overview. Optimum. Studia Ekonomiczne, 65 (5), 14–33. doi: 10.15290/ose.2013.05.65.02
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L, 1977. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15 (3), 234–281. doi: 10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L, 1990. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48 (1), 9–26. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L, 1994. Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L, 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1 (1), 83–98. doi: 10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. and Vargas, L., 2006. Decision making with the analytic network process: Economic, political, social and technological applications with benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. Pittsburgh: Springer. doi:10.1007/0-387-33987-6.
   Google Scholar
• Selig, E. T., and Boucher, D. L., 1990. Abrasion tests for railroad ballast. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 13 (4), 301–311. doi: 10.1520/GTJ10173J
   Google Scholar
• Selig, E. T. and Waters, J. M., 1994. Track geotechnology and substructure management. London: Thomas Telford.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, R., et al., 1983. Ballast and subgrade requirements study: railroad track substructure-materials evaluation and stabilization Practices. Report No. FRA/ORD-83/04.1. US Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, 386.
   Google Scholar
• Triantaphyllou, E., and Mann, S. H., 1995. Using the analytic hierarchy process for decision making in engineering applications: some challenges. International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Applications and Practice, 2 (1), 35–44.
   Google Scholar
• Watters, B., Klassen, M., and Clifton, A.W., 1987. Evaluation of ballast materials using petrographic criteria. Washington, DC. Vol. 1131, 45–63.
   Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E. K., Antuchevičienė, J., and Kaplinski, O., 2016. Multi-criteria decision making in civil engineering. Part II–applications. Engineering Structures and Technologies, 7 (4), 151–167. doi: 10.3846/2029882X.2016.1139664
   Google Scholar