Effect of filler in asphalt mastic on rheological behaviour and susceptibility to rutting

References

• AASHTO, 2017. M320-17. Standard Specification for performance-Graded asphalt binder. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO, 2018. T350-14(2018). Standard method of test for multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) test of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer (DSR). Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• Bukat, K., et al., 2008. Evaluation of the influence of bi and sb additions to sn-ag-cu and sn-zn alloys on their surface tension and wetting properties using analysis of variance–anova. Soldering & Surface Mount Technology, 20 (4), 9–19. doi: 10.1108/09540910810902660
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buttlar, W., et al., 1999. Understanding asphalt mastic behavior through micromechanics. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1681, 157–169. doi: 10.3141/1681-19
   Google Scholar
• Cardone, F., Frigio, F., Ferrotti, G. & Canestrari, F., 2015. Influence of mineral fillers on the rheological response of polymer-modified bitumens and mastics. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 2 (6), 373-381. doi: 10.1016/j.jtte.2015.06.003
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y., et al., 2016. Influence of the properties of filler on high and medium temperature performances of asphalt mastic. Construction and Building Materials, 118, 268–275. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clopotel, C.S., and Bahia, H.U, 2012. Importance of elastic recovery in the dsr for binders and mastics. Engineering Journal, 16 (4), 99–106. doi: 10.4186/ej.2012.16.4.99
   Google Scholar
• D’angelo, J, 2010. New high-temperature binder specification using multistress creep and recovery. Transportation Research Circular, n. E-C147, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• D'angelo, J.A., 2011. The relationship of the mscr test to rutting. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 10 (sup1), 61–80. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2009.9690236
   Google Scholar
• Delgadillo, R., Nam, K., and Bahia, H, 2006. Why do we need to change g*/sinδ and how? Road Materials and Pavement Design, 7 (1), 7–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gama, D.A., et al., 2016. Rheological studies of asphalt modified with elastomeric polymer. Construction and Building Materials, 106, 290–295. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain, Z., et al., 2016. Use of the multiple stress creep recovery (mscr) test method to characterize polymer-modified asphalt binders. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 44 (1), 507–520. doi: 10.1520/JTE20140061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling, C., Arshadi, A., and Bahia, H, 2016. Importance of binder modification type and aggregate structure on rutting resistance of asphalt mixtures using image-based multi-scale modelling. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 18 (4), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, G., et al., 2017. Applicability of evaluation indices for asphalt and filler interaction ability. Construction and Building Materials, 148, 599–609. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motamed, A., and Bahia, H.U, 2011. Influence of test geometry, temperature, stress level, and loading duration on binder properties measured using dsr. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 23 (10), 1422–1432. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MOT, Ministry of Transport of the People's Republic of China, 2011. JTG E20-2011. Standard Test Methods of Bitumen and Bituminous Mixtures for Highway Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu, H., et al., 2013. Influence of filler–bitumen ratio on performance of modified asphalt mortar by additive. Journal of Modern Transportation, 21 (1), 40–46. doi: 10.1007/s40534-013-0002-2
   Google Scholar
• Raykov, T., and Marcoulides, G.A., 2013. Basic statistics: An introduction with R. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood, B.S., and Kim, Y.R, 2011. Experimental investigation into the multiscale behaviour of asphalt concrete. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 12 (4), 357–370. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2011.574136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood, B.S., and Kim, Y.R, 2013. Microstructural investigation of asphalt concrete for performing multiscale experimental studies. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 14 (5), 498–516. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2012.746689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood, B.S., and Kim, Y.R, 2015. Nonlinear viscoelastic analysis of asphalt cement and asphalt mastics. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 16 (6), 510–529. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2014.943133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., et al., 2011. Effect of mineral filler characteristics on asphalt mastic and mixture rutting potential. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2208, 33–39. doi: 10.3141/2208-05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, G, 2017. Shear creep response of an airport asphalt mastic. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 18 (7), 567–577. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2015.1095914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z.Q., Zhang, W.P., and Li, P, 2004. Ratio of filler bitumen of asphalt mixture. Journal of Changan University, 24 (5), 7–10.
   Google Scholar
• Zoorob, S.E., et al., 2012. Investigating the multiple stress creep recovery bitumen characterisation test. Construction and Building Materials, 30, 734–745. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar