Performance evaluation of geocell-reinforced reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) bases in flexible pavements

References

• AASHTO, 2008. Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide, a manual of practice. Interim edition Washington, DC: American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• Acharya, B., 2011. Experimental study on geocell-reinforced flexible pavements with recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) bases under cyclic loading. Thesis (MS). The University of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Qadi, I. and Hughes, J., 2000. Field evaluation of geocell use in flexible pavements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1709, 26–35. doi: 10.3141/1709-04
   Google Scholar
• American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), 1993. Guide for design of pavement structures. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
   Google Scholar
• American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) T307-99, 2003. Design guidelines standard method of test for determining the resilient modulus of soils and aggregate materials. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
   Google Scholar
• Asphalt Institute, 1982. Research and development of the Asphalt Institute's thickness design manual. College Park, MD: Asphalt Institute.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D1241-15, 2015. Standard specification for materials for soil-aggregate subbase, base, and surface courses. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D1556/D1556M-15e1, 2015. Standard test method for density and unit weight of soil in place by sand-cone method. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D6951/D6951M-18, 2018. Standard test method for use of the dynamic cone penetrometer in shallow pavement applications. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM D854-00, 2000. Standard test methods for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• Attia, M. I. E., 2010. Characterization of the structural behavior of reclaimed asphalt pavement as pavement base layer. Dissertation (PhD). The North Dakota State University.
   Google Scholar
• Avirneni, D., Peddinti, P. R. T., and Saride, S., 2016. Durability and long-term performance of geopolymer stabilized reclaimed asphalt pavement base courses. Construction and Building Materials, 121, 198–209. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A., 2017. Response of unsaturated soils under monotonic and dynamic loading over moderate suction states. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A., Patil, U.D., Puppala, A.J., et al., 2018. Suction-controlled repeated load triaxial test of subgrade soil at high suction states. In: C.W.W. Ng, A.K. Leung, A.C.F. Chiu and C. Zhou, eds. Unsaturated Soils, Proceeding of Seventh International Conference on Unsaturated Soils. Hong Kong: HKUST, 667–672.
   Google Scholar
• Bennert, T., et al., 2000. Utilization of construction and demolition debris under traffic-type loading in base and subbase applications. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1714, 33–39. doi: 10.3141/1714-05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortz, B.S., et al., 2012. Low-volume paved road improvement with geocell reinforcement. No. 12-3662. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, S and Nair, S, 2018. Impact of curing time on moisture-induced damage in lime-treated soils. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2018.1453068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, J.T., Banerjee, A., Chakraborty, S., et al., 2018. A Framework for Assessment of Sustainability and Resilience in Subgrade Stabilization for a High-Volume Road. Transportation Research Board 97th Annual Meeting, January 7-10, 2018, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Dash, S.K., Rajagopal, K., and Krishnaswamy, N.R., 2007. Behaviour of geocell-reinforced sand beds under strip loading. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 44 (7), 905–916. doi: 10.1139/t07-035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deniz, D., Tutumluer, E., and Popovics, J. S., 2010. Evaluation of expensive characteristics of reclaimed asphalt pavement and virgin aggregate used as base materials. Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board, 2167, 10–17. doi: 10.3141/2167-02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, A.M., Banerjee, A, Puppala, A.J., et al., 2019. An integrated LCA-LCCA framework for selection of sustainable pavement design. Transportation Research Board 98th Annual Meeting, January 13–17, 2019, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• George, A.M., Banerjee, A., Taylor, T., et al., 2019. Large-Scale Experimental Studies to Evaluate the Resilient Modulus of Geocell-Reinforced Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Bases. Geosynthetics Conference 2019, February 10-13, Houston, Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Gnanendran, C. T. and Woodburn, L. J., 2003. Recycled aggregate for pavement construction and the influence of stabilization. Proceedings on conference of the Australian road research board. Leederville, Australia: 21, 1755–1768.
   Google Scholar
• Han, J., et al., 2011. Performance of geocell-reinforced RAP bases over weak subgrade under full-scale moving wheel loads. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 23 (11), 1525–1534. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, K.R. and Copeland, A., 2017. Annual asphalt pavement industry survey on recycled materials and warm-mix asphalt usage: 2016, 7th annual survey (IS 138). Lanham, MD: National Asphalt Pavement Association.
   Google Scholar
• Holtz, R.D., Christopher, B.R., and Berg, R.R., 2008. Geosynthetic design and construction guidelines, reference manual (NHI course No. 132013). FHWA Publication No. FHWA-HI-95-038. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyos, L. R., Puppala, A. J., and Ordonez, C. A., 2011. Characterization of cement fibre-treated reclaimed asphalt pavement aggregates: Preliminary investigation. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 23 (7), 977–989. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazmee, H., Tutumluer, E., and Beshears, S., 2016. Using accelerated pavement testing to evaluate reclaimed asphalt pavement materials for pavement unbound granular layers. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 29 (2), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaHucik, J., et al., 2016. Cement-treated bases containing reclaimed asphalt pavement, quarry by-products, and fibers. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2580, 10–17. doi: 10.3141/2580-02
   Google Scholar
• Li, L., et al., 2007. Evaluation of recycled asphalt pavement material stabilized with fly ash. Soil and Material Inputs for Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design, 169, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Maher, M. H., Gucunski, N., and Papp Jr, W. J., 1997. Recycled asphalt pavement as a base and sub-base material. ASTM Special Technical Publication 1275. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society of Testing and Materials, 42–53.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammad, L.N, Puppala, A.J., and Alavilli, P., 1995. Resilient Properties of Laboratory Compacted Subgrade Soils. Transportation Research Record, 1196, 87–102.
   Google Scholar
• Mohammadinia, A., et al., 2014. Laboratory evaluation of the use of cement treated construction and demolition materials in pavement base and subbase applications. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 28 (7), 899–1561.
   Google Scholar
• Mulheron, M. and O’Mahony, M.M., 1990. Properties and performance of recycled aggregates. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 37 (2), 35–37.
   Google Scholar
• NAPA, 2009. Black and green sustainable asphalt, now and tomorrow. Special report 200. National Ashpalt Pavement Association. Available from: https://www.asphaltpavement.org/images/stories/sustainability_report_2009.pdf [Accessed 21 January 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Papp Jr, W. J., et al., 1998. Behaviour of construction and demolition debris in base and subbase applications. Proceedings of geo-congress: recycled materials in geotechnical applications. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 122–136.
   Google Scholar
• Pokharel, S., et al., 2011. Accelerated pavement testing of geocell-reinforced unpaved roads over weak subgrade. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2204 (1), 67–75. doi: 10.3141/2204-09
   Google Scholar
• Potturi, A.K, 2006. Evaluation of resilient modulus of cement and cement-fiber treated reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) aggregates using repeated load triaxial test. Thesis (MS). The University of Texas at Arlington.
   Google Scholar
• Potturi, A., Puppala, A. J., and Hoyos, L. R., 2007. Resilient characteristics of cement treated reclaimed asphalt pavement aggregates. No. 07-1838. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Puppala, A.J., Congress, S.S.C., and Banerjee, A., 2019. Research Advancements in Expansive Soil Characterization, Stabilization and Geoinfrastructure Monitoring. Frontiers in Geotechnical Engineering, 15–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5871-5. Book section (Springer Publishers, Singapore). doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-5871-5_2
   Google Scholar
• Puppala, A.J., Congress, S.S.C., Bheemasetti, T.V., et al., 2018. Visualization of Civil Infrastructure Emphasizing Geomaterial Characterization and Performance. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 30 (10), 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puppala, A.J., Hoyos, L.R., and Potturi, A.K., 2011. Resilient moduli response of moderately cement-treated reclaimed asphalt pavement aggregates. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 23 (7), 990–998. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puppala, Anand J., Manosuthkij, Thammanoon, Nazarian, Soheil, et al., 2011. Threshold moisture content and matric suction potentials in expansive clays prior to initiation of cracking in pavements. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 48 (4), 519–531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/t10-087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rana, A. S. M. A., 2004. Evaluation of recycled material performance in highway applications and optimization of their use. Dissertation (PhD). Texas Tech University.
   Google Scholar
• Saladhi, M., 2017. Experimental study on resilient behaviour of geocell-reinforced recycled asphalt pavement base layer: model development. Thesis (Masters). The University of Texas at Arlington.
   Google Scholar
• Sambodh, A., 2017. Mechanical properties of soil-RAP-geopolymer for the stabilization of road base/subbase. Thesis (MS). University of Louisiana at Lafayette.
   Google Scholar
• Saride, S., Rayabharapu, V. K., and Vedpathak, S., 2015. Evaluation of rutting behaviour of geocell reinforced sand subgrades under repeated loading. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 45 (4), 378–388. doi: 10.1007/s40098-014-0120-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taha, R., et al., 1999. Evaluation of reclaimed asphalt pavement aggregate in road bases and subbases. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1652, 264–269. doi: 10.3141/1652-33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taha, R., et al., 2002. Cement stabilization of reclaimed asphalt pavement aggregate for road bases and subbases. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 14 (3), 239–245. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:3(239)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TEX-113-E, 2011. Laboratory compaction characteristics and moisture-density relationship of base materials. Austin, TX: Texas Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Thakur, S.C., et al., 2010. Laboratory evaluation of physical and mechanical properties of recycled asphalt pavement as a base course material. Geotechnical Special Publication, 203, 255–263.
   Google Scholar
• Thakur, J.K., 2011. Geocell-reinforced unpaved and paved roads with recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) bases: experimental study and damage model development. (Doctoral dissertation). Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
   Google Scholar
• Thakur, J.K., et al., 2012. Performance of geocell-reinforced recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) bases over weak subgrade under cyclic plate loading. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 35, 14–24. doi: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2012.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakur, J. K., Han, J., and Parsons, R. L., 2017. Factors influencing deformations of geocell-reinforced recycled asphalt pavement bases under cyclic loading. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 29 (3), 899–1561. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timm, D.H., Newcomb, D.E., Birgisson, B., et al., 1999. Incorporation of reliability into the Minnesota mechanistic-empirical pavement design method. Minnesota: Minnesota Department of Transportation, (Report No. MN/RC-1999-35).
   Google Scholar
• Wilburn, D. R. and Goonam, T. G., 1998. Aggregates from natural and recycled sources: economic assessments for construction applications – a materials flow analysis. USGS Circular, 1176. Reston, VA: US Department of Interior US Geological Survey.
   Google Scholar
• Witczak, M. W., 2004. Harmonized test methods for laboratory determination of resilient modulus for flexible pavement design – NCHRP 1-28A. Washington, DC: National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., et al., 2010. Bearing capacity of geocell reinforcement in embankment engineering. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 28 (5), 475–482. doi: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar