References
- AASHTO R 30-10, 2010. Standard practice for mixture conditioning of hot mix asphalt (HMA). Washington, DC: American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials.
- AASHTO T 27-11, 2011. Standard method of test for sieve analysis of fine and coarse aggregates. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
- AASHTO T 30-10, 2010. Standard method of test for mechanical analysis of extracted aggregate. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
- AASHTO T 308-10, 2010. Determining the asphalt binder content of hot mix asphalt (HMA) by the ignition method. Washington, DC: American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials.
- AASHTO T 312-12, 2012. Preparing and determining the density of hot mix asphalt (HMA) specimens by means of the superpave gyratory compactor. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
- AASHTO T 316-11, 2011. Viscosity determination of asphalt binder using rotational viscometer. Washington, DC: American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials.
- AASHTO TP 105-13, 2013. AASHTO TP 105-13, standard method for determining the fracture energy of asphalt mixtures using the semi circular bend geometry (SCB). Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
- AASHTO TP 124-16, 2016. Determining the fracture potential of asphalt mixtures using semicircular bend geometry (SCB) at intermediate temperature. Washington, DC: American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials.
- AASHTO TP 79-13, A.T., 2013. Standard method for determining the dynamic modulus and flow number for hot mix asphalt (HMA) using the asphalt mixture performance tester (AMPT). Washington, DC: American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials.
- Asphalt Institute Executive Offices and Research Center, 2016. Determining laboratory mixing and compaction temperatures.
- Aurangzeb, Q., et al., 2012. Achieving desired volumetrics and performance for mixtures with high percentage of reclaimed asphalt pavement. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2294, 34–42. doi: 10.3141/2294-04
- Bennert, T., Daniel, J., and Mogawer, W, 2014. Strategies for incorporating higher recycled asphalt pavement percentages. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2445 (2445), 83–93. Available from: http://trrjournalonline.trb.org/doi/10.3141/2445-10.
- Biligiri, K., et al., 2007. Rational modeling of tertiary flow for asphalt mixtures. Transportation Research Record, 2001 (1), 63–72. Available from: http://trb.metapress.com/openurl.asp?genre=article&id=doi:10.3141/2001-08.
- Bonaquist, R. F., Christensen, D. W., and Stump, W., 2003. Simple performance tester for superpave mix design: first-article development and evaluation. Transportation Research Board, 513, 6–9.
- Coleri, E., Sreedhar, S., Haddadi, S., et al., 2017a. Adjusting asphalt mixes for increased durability and implementation of a performance tester to evaluate fatigue cracking of asphalt concrete. SPR 785, Final report for Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, Oregon, FHWA-OR-18-06.
- Coleri, E., Zhang, Y., and Wruck, B.M, 2018. Mechanistic-empirical simulations and life-cycle cost analysis to determine the cost and performance effectiveness of asphalt mixtures containing recycled materials. Transportation Research Record, 2672(40), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118776479.
- Darnell Jr, J., and Bell, C.A., 2015. Performance based selection of RAP/RAS in asphalt mixtures (No. FHWA-OR-RD-16-08).
- Francken, L., 1977. Permanent deformation law of Bituminous road mixes in repeated triaxial compression. In: Presented at Fourth International Conference on the Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
- Hansen, K.R. and Copeland, A., 2014. Asphalt pavement industry survey on recycled materials and warm-mix asphalt usage 2014. Lanham, MD: National Asphalt Pavement Association (NAPA).
- Harvey, J., et al., 2014. Superpave implementation Phase II: comparison of performance-related test results (No. CA16-2356A).
- Kaseer, F., et al., 2018a. Performance of asphalt mixtures with high recycled materials content and recycling agents. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 1477-268, 1–15.
- Kaseer, F., et al., 2018b. Development of an index to evaluate the cracking potential of asphalt mixtures using the semi-circular bending test. Construction and Building Materials, 167, 286–298. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.014
- Kim, S., et al., 2009. Performance of polymer-modified asphalt mixture with reclaimed asphalt pavement. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2126 (1), 109–114. doi: 10.3141/2126-13
- Li, X., et al., 2008. Effect of reclaimed asphalt pavement (proportion and type) and binder grade on asphalt mixtures. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2051, 90–97. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2051-11.
- MATLAB, R, 2016. MATLAB and statistics toolbox, 2016. The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, United States.
- Mcdaniel, R., and Anderson, R.M, 2001. NCHRP web document 30: recommended use of reclaimed asphalt pavement in the superpave mix design method–project 9–12. Final report.
- Newcomb, D., et al., 2015. Short-term laboratory conditioning of asphalt mixtures No. 815., National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP), Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
- Nsengiyumva, G., 2015. Development of semi-circular bending (SCB) fracture test for Bituminous mixtures.
- ODOT TM 319, 2018. Preparation and characterization of recycled asphalt materials for mix design, oregon department of transportation.
- Oregon Department of Transportation, 2013. 2012 Pavement condition report. Salem, OR: Pavement Services Unit.
- Ozer, H., et al., 2016. Development of the fracture-based flexibility index for asphalt concrete cracking potential using modified semi-circle bending test parameters. Construction and Building Materials, 115, 390–401. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.144
- Rodezno, M.C., West, R., and Taylor, A, 2015. Flow number test and assessment of AASHTO TP 79-13 rutting criteria comparison of rutting performance of hot-mix and warm-mix asphalt mixtures. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2507, 100–107. doi: 10.3141/2507-11
- Sreedhar, S., Coleri, E., and Haddadi, S.S, 2018. Selection of a performance test to assess the cracking resistance of asphalt concrete materials. Construction and Building Materials, 179, 285–293. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.258
- West, R., et al., 2009. Testing of moderate and high reclaimed asphalt pavement content mixes. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2126 (1), 100–108. doi: 10.3141/2126-12
- West, R., et al., 2012. Phase IV NCAT pavement test track findings. Auburn, AL: National Center for Asphalt Technology, Report Number NCAT 12-10.
- Willis, R., et al., 2012. Effects of changing virgin binder grade and content on rap mixture properties, National Center for Asphalt Technology Report.
- Wu, Z., et al., 2005. Fracture resistance characterization of superpave mixtures using the semi-circular bending test. Journal of ASTM International, 2 (3), 1–15. doi: 10.1520/JAI12264
- Yin, F., et al., 2017. Characterising the long-term rejuvenating effectiveness of recycling agents on asphalt blends and mixtures with high RAP and RAS contents. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 18 (sup4), 273–292. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2017.1389074
- Zaumanis, M., and Mallick, R.B, 2015. Review of very high-content reclaimed asphalt use in plant-produced pavements: state of the art. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 16 (1), 39–55. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2014.893331