Simplified novel approach for estimating HMA overlay thickness schedule using long-term performance indicators

References

• AASHTO, 1993. Guide for design of pavement structures. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• AASHTO, 2015. Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide, a manual of practice. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• Abaza, K.A., 2016. Back-calculation of transition probabilities for Markovian-based pavement performance prediction models. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 17 (3), 253–264. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2014.993185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abaza, K.A., 2018. Empirical-Markovian model for predicting the overlay design thickness for asphalt concrete pavement. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 19 (7), 1617–1635. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2017.1338188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abaza, K.A., 2019. Simplified empirical approach for predicting the remaining strength factor used in pavement rehabilitation applications. Cogent Engineering, 6 (1), 1–21. doi: 10.1080/23311916.2019.1571003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abed, A., Thom, N., and Neves, L., 2019. Probabilistic prediction of asphalt pavement performance. Road Materials and Pavement Design, DOI:10.1080/14680629.2019.1593229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amin, M.S.R., 2015. The pavement performance modeling: deterministic vs. stochastic approaches. In: S. Kadry and A. El Hami, eds. Numerical methods for reliability and safety assessment. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International, 179–196.
   Google Scholar
• Asphalt Institute, AI, 1996. Asphalt overlays for highway and street rehabilitation, Manual Series No. 17, Lexington, KY: Asphalt Institute (AI).
   Google Scholar
• Asphalt Institute, AI, 1999. Thickness design-asphalt pavements for highways and streets, manual series no. 1. 9th ed. Lexington, KY: Asphalt Institute (AI).
   Google Scholar
• Bianchini, A., Gonzalez, C.R., and Bell, H.P., 2018. Correction for the asphalt overlay thickness of flexible pavements considering pavement conditions. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 19 (7), 577–585. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2016.1198480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• California Department of Transportation, Caltrans, 2017. Highway design manual (HDM). 6th ed Sacramento, CA: Caltrans.
   Google Scholar
• Fuentes, L., et al., 2019. Modelling pavement serviceability of urban roads using deterministic and probabilistic approaches. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, DOI:10.1080/10298436.2019.1577422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heravi, G. and Esmaeeli, A.N., 2014. Fuzzy multi criteria decision making approach for pavement project evaluation using life-cycle cost/performance analysis. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 20, 04014002. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, M.S., 2003. Direct method for evaluating structural needs of flexible pavements with falling-weight deflectometer deflections. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1860, 41–47. doi: 10.3141/1860-05
   Google Scholar
• Hong, F. and Prozzi, J.A., 2015. Pavement deterioration model incorporating unobserved heterogeneity for optimal life-cycle rehabilitation policy. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 21, 04014027. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Y., 2004. Pavement analysis and design. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Jorge, D. and Ferreira, A., 2012. Road network pavement maintenance optimization using the HDM-4 pavement performance prediction models. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 13, 39–51. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2011.563851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le, V.P., et al., 2017. Development of a simple asphalt concrete overlay design scheme based on mechanistic–empirical approach. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 18 (3), 630–645. doi: 10.1080/14680629.2016.1182059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lethanh, N. and Adey, B., 2013. Use of exponential hidden Markov models for modelling pavement deterioration. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 14 (7), 645–654. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2012.715647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lethanh, N., Kaito, K., and Kobayashi, K., 2015. Infrastructure deterioration prediction with a Poisson hidden Markov model on time series data. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 21 (3), 04014051. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maji, A., Singh, D., and Chawla, H., 2016. Developing probabilistic approach for asphaltic overlay design by considering variability of input parameters. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 1 (1), 43. doi: 10.1007/s41062-016-0046-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathew, B.S. and Isaac, K.P., 2014. Optimization of maintenance strategy for rural road network using genetic algorithm. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 15, 352–360. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2013.806807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meidani, H. and Ghanem, R., 2015. Random Markov decision processes for sustainable infrastructure systems. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 11 (5), 655–667. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2014.893445
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nam, B.H., et al., 2016. Improvements to the structural condition index (SCI) for pavement structural evaluation at network level. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 17 (8), 680–697. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2015.1014369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobakht, M., Sakhaeifar, M.S., and Newcomb, D., 2017. Development of rehabilitation strategies based on structural capacity for composite and flexible pavements. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, 143 (4), 04016016. doi: 10.1061/JTEPBS.0000012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, J. and Ferreira, A., 2013. Life-cycle cost analysis system for pavement management at project level. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 14, 71–84. doi: 10.1080/10298436.2011.618535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarker, P., et al., 2015. Overlay thickness design for low-volume roads: mechanistic-empirical approach with nondestructive deflection testing and pavement damage models. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2509, 46–56. doi: 10.3141/2509-06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K.D., et al., 2017. Using falling weight deflectometer data with mechanistic-empirical design and analysis, Volume I (No. FHWA-HRT-16-009), Final Report, 186p.
   Google Scholar
• Tutumluer, E. and Sarker, P., 2015. Development of improved pavement rehabilitation procedures based on FWD backcalculation. NEXTRANS Project, (094IY04), Final Report, 83p.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, F., Hu, S., and Scullion, T., 2010. Advanced asphalt overlay thickness design and analysis system. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 79, 597–634.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, H., Huddleston, J., and Lundy, J., 1992. Implementation of backcalculation in pavement evaluation and overlay design in Oregon. Transportation Research Record, 1377, 150–158.
   Google Scholar