Entropy-based fuzzy SWOT decision-making for condition assessment of airfield pavements

References

• AC, 2014a. Advisory Circular No. 150/5380-6C, guidelines and procedures for maintenance of airport pavements. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration.
   Google Scholar
• AC, 2014b. Advisory Circular No. 150/5335-5C, standardized method of reporting airport pavement strength-PCN. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration.
   Google Scholar
• AC, 2016. Advisory Circular No. 150/5320-6F, airport pavement design and evaluation. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S., Vedagiri, P., and Rao, K.K., 2017. Prioritization of pavement maintenance sections using objective based analytic hierarchy process. International Journal Pavement Research and Technology, 10 (2), 158–170. doi: 10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.01.001
   Google Scholar
• Arliansyah, J., Maruyama, T., and Takahashi, O., 2003. A development of fuzzy pavement condition assessment. journal of materials. Concrete Structures and Pavement, 746 (61), 275–285.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM, 2012. ASTM d5340, standard test method for airport pavement condition index surveys. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM international.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM, 2015a. ASTM d4694, standard test method for deflections with a falling-weight-type impulse load device. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM international.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM, 2015b. ASTM d4695, standard guide for general pavement deflection measurements. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM international.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchini, A., 2012. Fuzzy representation of pavement condition for efficient pavement management. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 27, 608–619. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2012.00758.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, C.H., 1996. Evaluating naval tactical missile systems by fuzzy AHP based on the grade value of membership function. European Journal of Operational Research, 96 (2), 343–350. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00026-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, S., and Husain, T., 2006. Evaluation of drinking water treatment technology: an entropy-based fuzzy application. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 132, 1264–1271. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2006)132:10(1264)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Destafney, T.M., 1985. CBR design of flexible airfield pavements with case study. Thesis (ME). University of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Dynatest 8081 Heavy Weight Deflectometer, 2019. Available from: https://dynatest.egnyte.com/dl/WW6ohIcCT8 [Accessed 22 April 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Elmod, 2018. Elmod 6: quick start manual. Dynatest International A/S, Demark.
   Google Scholar
• Elton, D.J., and Juang, C.H., 1988. Asphalt pavement evaluation using fuzzy sets. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1196, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J., Shahin, M.Y., and Alexander, D.R., 2004. Airfield pavement condition assessment. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1889 (1), 63–70. doi: 10.3141/1889-08
   Google Scholar
• Hong, H.P., and Wang, S.S., 2003. Stochastic modeling of pavement performance. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 4 (4), 235–243. doi: 10.1080/10298430410001672246
   Google Scholar
• Horonjeff, R., et al., 2010. Planning and design of Airports (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Y.H., 2004. Pavement analysis and design (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail, N., Ismail, A., and Atiq, R., 2009. An overview of expert systems in pavement management. European Journal of Scientific Research, 30 (1), 99–111.
   Google Scholar
• Karaşahin, M., and Terzi, S., 2014. Performance model for asphalt concrete pavement based on the fuzzy logic approach. Transport, 29 (1), 18–27. doi: 10.3846/16484142.2014.893926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klir, G.J., and Yuan, B., 1995. Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic theory and applications (1st ed.). London: Prentice-Hall International.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, Z., and Yin, H., 2008. Probabilistic analysis of pavement distress ratings with the clusterwise regression method. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2084, 38–46. doi: 10.3141/2084-05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moazami, D., Behbahani, H., and Muniandy, R., 2011. Pavement rehabilitation and maintenance prioritization of urban roads using fuzzy logic. Expert Systems with Applications, 38 (10), 12869–12879. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozturk, S, 2015. Determining management strategies for the Sarikum nature protection area. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 187 (3), 113. doi: 10.1007/s10661-015-4302-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H., and Kim, Y., 2003. Prediction of remaining life of asphalt pavement with falling-weight deflectometer multiload-level deflections. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1860, 48–56. doi: 10.3141/1860-06
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T.L., 1980. The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority Setting, resource Allocation. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, Y.U., et al., 2013. Development of overall pavement condition index for urban road network. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 104, 332–341. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.126
   Google Scholar
• Shahin, M.Y., 2005. Pavement management for airports, roads, and parking lots (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, A.P., et al., 2017. Pavement condition assessment using soft computing techniques. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 11 (6), 564–581. doi: 10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.12.006
   Google Scholar
• Srinivas, R., and Singh, A.P., 2017. Impact assessment of industrial wastewater discharge in a river basin using interval-valued fuzzy group decision-making and spatial approach. environment. Development and Sustainability, 20 (5), 2373–2397. doi: 10.1007/s10668-017-9994-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivas, R., et al., 2018. Sustainable management of a river basin by integrating an improved fuzzy based hybridized SWOT model and geo-statistical weighted thematic overlay analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 563, 92–105. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.05.059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, L., and Gu, W., 2011. Pavement condition assessment using fuzzy logic theory and analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 137 (9), 648–655. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taheriyoun, M., Karamouz, M., and Baghvand, A., 2010. Development of an entropy-based fuzzy eutrophication index for reservoir water quality evaluation. Iranian Journal of Environmental Health Science Engineering, 7 (1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Vyas, V., et al., 2019a. Application of infrared thermography for debonding detection in asphalt pavements. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 9 (3), 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-019-00337-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vyas, V., Singh, A.P., and Srivastava, A., 2019b. A decision making framework for condition evaluation of airfield pavements using non-destructive testing. In: I. L. Al-Qadi, H. Ozer, A. Loizos and S. Murrell, eds. Airfield and highway pavements 2019: Innovation and sustainability in highway and airfield pavement technology. Chicago, IL: American Society of Civil Engineers, 343–353.
   Google Scholar
• Wee, S., and Kim, N., 2006. Angular fuzzy logic application for pavement maintenance and rehabilitation strategy in Ohio. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 10 (2), 81–89. doi: 10.1007/BF02823925
   Google Scholar
• Yang, J., et al., 2006. Modeling crack deterioration of flexible pavements: comparison of recurrent Markov chains and artificial neural networks. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1974 (1), 18–25. doi: 10.1177/0361198106197400103
   Google Scholar
• Zavadskas, E.K., Liias, R., and Turskis, Z., 2008. Multi-attribute decision-making methods for assessment of quality in bridges and road construction: state-of-the-art surveys. Baltic Journal of Road & Bridge Engineering, 3, 3. doi: 10.3846/1822-427X.2008.3.152-160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., Singh, N., and Hudson, W.R., 1993. Comprehensive ranking index for flexible pavement using fuzzy sets model. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1397, 96–102.
   Google Scholar