Influence of surface distresses on smartphone-based pavement roughness evaluation

References

• Abudinen, Daniel, Fuentes, Luis, and Carvajal-Munoz, Juan S., 2017. Travel quality assessment on urban roads based on International Roughness Index : case study in Colombia. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (April), 1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.3141/2612-01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlin, Kjella and Granlund, N. O. J., 2011. Relating road roughness and vehicle speeds to human whole body vibration and exposure limits. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 3 (4), 207–216. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10298430210001701
   Google Scholar
• Aleadelat, Waleed, et al., 2018. Evaluation of pavement roughness using an android-based smartphone. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, 144 (3), 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alessandroni, Giacomo, et al., 2015. Sensing road roughness via mobile devices: a study on speed influence. In: 9th International symposium on image and signal processing and analysis, Croatia. 270–275.
   Google Scholar
• Amador-jimenez, Luis and Matout, Nagham, 2014. A low cost solution to assess road’s roughness surface condition for pavement management. In: 93rd Annual meeting of the transportation research board, Washington. Vol. 2424.
   Google Scholar
• ARRB Group Ltd., 2008. Roughometer III user manual, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Benedetto, Andrea, et al., 2017. An overview of ground-penetrating radar signal processing techniques for road inspections. Signal Processing, 132, 201–209. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2016.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, Joseph, 2013. Sensor terminology. Available from: http://www.ni.com/white-paper/14860/en/#toc1. [Accessed 28 November 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Buttlar, William G. and Islam, Shahidul, 2014. Integration of smart-phone-based pavement roughness data collection tool with asset management system, Regional University Transportation Center Final Report.
   Google Scholar
• Cantisani, Giuseppe and Loprencipe, Giuseppe, 2010. Road roughness and whole body vibration : evaluation tools and comfort limits. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 136 (9), 818–826. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawla, Tulika, Kaur, Manjit, and Singh, Gurmohan, 2015. Design and sensitivity analysis of MEMS 3D Capacitive Comb Type Accelerometer. In: International Conference on Industrial Instrumentation and Control, ICIC 2015, Pune, India, 965–970.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, H. D. and Miyojim, M., 1998. Novel system for automatic pavement distress detection. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 12 (3), 145–152. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1998)12:3(145)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douangphachanh, Viengnam and Oneyama, Hiroyuki, 2013. Estimation of road roughness condition from smartphones under realistic settings. In: 13th International conference on ITS telecommunications, ITST 2013. IEEE, 433–439.
   Google Scholar
• Du, Yuchuan, et al., 2014. Measurement of International Roughness Index by using Z-axis accelerometers and GPS. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, Jakob, et al., 2008. The pothole patrol : using a mobile sensor network for road surface monitoring. In: MobiSys’08.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Highway Administration, USA, 2009. Pavement distress identification manual for the NPS road inventory. Cycle, 4, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Florida Department of Transportation, 2017. Flexible pavement condition survey handbook, State Materials Office Report.
   Google Scholar
• Fuentes, Luis, et al., 2019. Modelling pavement serviceability of urban roads using deterministic and probabilistic approaches probabilistic approaches. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuentes, Luis, et al., 2019. Pavement serviceability evaluation using whole body vibration techniques : a case study for urban roads. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A. K., 1967. A note on the Wiener Khinchin theorem for autocorrelation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Georgopoulos, A., Loizos, A., and Fiouda, A., 1995. Digital image processing as a tool for pavement distress evaluation. Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 50 (1), 23–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-2716(95)91844-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanly, Stephen William, 2016. Shock & vibration testing overview. USA: Researchgate.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, John J, 2000. Evaluation of pavement friction characteristics.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, Ting-wu, Chou, Chien-Cheng, Chen, Chine-Ta, et al., 2010. Pavement distress image recognition using K-Means and classification algorithms. In: Proceedings of the international conference on computing in civil and building engineering. Taiwan: Nottingham University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Islam, Shahidul, et al., 2014. Measurement of pavement roughness using android-based smartphone application. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (2457), 30–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.3141/2457-04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janani, L., et al., 2019. Prioritisation of pavement maintenance sections deploying functional characteristics of pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 1–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2019.1567923
   Google Scholar
• Khamzin, Aleksey K., et al., 2017. Utilization of air-launched ground penetrating radar (GPR) for pavement condition assessment. Construction and Building Materials, 141, 130–139. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kırbas, Ufuk, 2018. IRI sensitivity to the influence of surface distress on flexible pavements. Coatings, 8 (8), 3–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings8080271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, Vijay, 2016. Euler angles – geometry and mechanics _ Coursera. Geometry and Mechanics. Available from: https://ru.coursera.org/lecture/robotics-flight/euler-angles-WKG5O. [Accessed 9 October 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakou, Charalambos, Christodoulou, Symeon, and Dimitriou, Loukas, 2016. Roadway pavement anomaly classification utilizing smartphones and artificial intelligence. in 18th Mediterranean electrotechnical conference (MELECON).
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Ming, 2013. A study of mobile sensing using smartphones. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 2013, 1–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/469076
   Google Scholar
• Loizos, A. and Plati, C., 2008. An alternative approach to pavement roughness evaluation. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 9 (1), 69–78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10298430600949894
   Google Scholar
• Mohan, Prasanth, Padmanabhan, Venkata N., and Ramjee, Ramachandran, 2008. Nericell: rich monitoring of road and traffic conditions using mobile smartphones. In: SenSys’08. USA, 4–14.
   Google Scholar
• Nawaz, Sarfraz and Mascolo, Cecilia, 2014. Mining users’ significant driving routes with low-power sensors. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM conference on embedded network sensor systems – SenSys’14. USA, 236–250.
   Google Scholar
• Neeft, J.M, 2017. Multimodal map matching with smartphone data : a shortest path approach. Enschede, Netherlands: University of Twente.
   Google Scholar
• Ouyang, W. and Xu, B., 2013. Pavement cracking measurements using 3D laser-scan images. Measurement Science and Technology, 24 (10), 9–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/24/10/105204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasanth, P. and Karthikeyan, U., 2016. Effective tracking of misbehavioral driver & over speed monitoring with emergency support. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Engineering and Technology, 5 (10), 2527–2529.
   Google Scholar
• Sadjadi, Seyed Yousef, 2017. Investigating for road roughness using smartphone sensors. International Journal of Computers and Communications, 11, 56–63.
   Google Scholar
• Sayers, Michael W., Gillespie, Thomas D., and Paterson, William D., 1986. Guidelines for conducting and calibrating road roughness measurements. Washington, USA: The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Sayers, M. W., Gillespie, T. D., and Queiroz, C. A. V., 1985. The international road roughness experiment: a basis for establishing a standard scale for road roughness measurements. Transportation Research Record, 1084, 76–85.
   Google Scholar
• Sayers, Michael W. and Karamihas, Steven M., 1996. Interpretation of road roughness profile data, Report for Federal Highway Administration. USA.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, Yogesh U., et al., 2013. Development of overall pavement condition index for urban road network. In: 2nd Conference of transportation research group of India (2nd CTRG) Development. 104. Elsevier B.V, 332–341.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, Anil, Ahuja, Sarthak, Gautam, Mayank, et al., 2013. Smartphone audio based distress detection. In: Audio, speech, and language processing, India.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, Ajit Pratap, Antriksh, Sharma, Mishra, Raunak, et al., 2018. Pavement condition assessment using soft computing techniques. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, 11 (6), 564–581. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.12.006
   Google Scholar
• Sparkfun, 2018. MMA8452Q accelerometer breakout hookup guide. Available from: https://learn.sparkfun.com/tutorials/mma8452q-accelerometer-breakout-hookup-guide/example-code.[Accessed 4 October 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi, Dean. 2018. Smartphone users will Top 3 Billion in 2018, Hit 3.8 Billion by 2021. Venturebeat. Available from: https://venturebeat.com/2018/09/11/newzoo-smartphone-users-will-top-3-billion-in-2018-hit-3-8-billion-by-2021/ [Accessed 14 May 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Tuck, Kimberly, 2012. Offset Calibration of the MMA8451, 2, 3Q. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Turakhia, Tejas P. and Modi, Prof M. J., 2016. Mathematical modeling and simulation of a simple quarter car vibration model. International Journal for Scientific Research and Development, (December), 448–450.
   Google Scholar
• Wai-Lok Lai, Wallace, Derobert, Xavier, and Annan, Peter, 2018. A review of ground penetrating radar application in civil engineering: a 30-year Journey from Locating and Testing to Imaging and Diagnosis. NDT and E International, 96, 58–78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2017.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, K. C. P. and Gong, W., 2002. Automated pavement distress survey: a review and a new direction. Pavement Evaluation Conference (May): 21–25.
   Google Scholar
• Wessels, Illeze and Steyn, Wynand Jvdm, 2018. Continuous, response-based road roughness measurements utilising data harvested from telematics device sensors. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2018.1483505
   Google Scholar
• Wunnava, Subbarao V, et al., 2007. Travel time estimation using cell phones for highways and roadways.
   Google Scholar
• Yoder, Eldon J., Milhous, R.T., and H.R.B., 1965. Comparison of Different Methods of Measuring Pavement Condition, National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report.
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, Byeong-Seok, Park, Chang-Ho, and Kang, Seung-Pil, 2005. Travel time estimation using mobile data. Proceedings of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 5, 1533–1547.
   Google Scholar
• Zoysa, Kasun De, Keppitiyagama, Chamath, Seneviratne, Gihan P., et al., 2007. A public transport system based sensor network for road surface condition monitoring. In: NSDR’07. Japan.
   Google Scholar