A gradient boosting approach to understanding airport runway and taxiway pavement deterioration

References

• Attoh-Okine, N.O., 1994. Predicting roughness progression in flexible pavements using artificial neural networks. In: Proc., 3rd int. conf. on managing pavements, transportation research board. San Antonio, TX, 55–62.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, D.G. and Ruschy, D.L., 1995. Calculated and measured air and soil freeze-thaw frequencies. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 34 (10), 2197–2205.
   Google Scholar
• Barua, L., et al., 2019b. Predicting airport runway and taxiway pavement conditions: a gradient boosting approach. In: Proceedings of the 98th annual meeting of the transportation research board. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Barua, L., Zou, B., and Zhou, Y., 2019a. Machine learning for international freight transportation management: a comprehensive review. Under review.
   Google Scholar
• Bianchini, A. and Bandini, P., 2010. Prediction of pavement performance through neuro-fuzzy reasoning. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 25 (1), 39–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brain, D. and Webb, G., 1999. On the effect of data set size on bias and variance in classification learning. In: R. Debbie, ed. Proceedings of the fourth Australian knowledge acquisition workshop. Sydney: University of New South Wales, 117–128.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman, L., 2017. Classification and regression trees. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carnahan, J.V., et al., 1987. Optimal maintenance decisions for pavement management. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 113 (5), 554–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, P., Oppermann, M., and Wu, S.S., 1997. North Carolina’s experience in development of pavement performance prediction and modeling. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1592, 80–88.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, J.H., Adams, T.M., and Bahia, H.U., 2004. Pavement roughness modeling using back-propagation neural networks. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 19 (4), 295–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, J., O'Neill, W.A., and Cheng, H.D., 1994. Pavement distress classification using neural networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics society. San Antonio, TX: IEEE, 397–401.
   Google Scholar
• Darlington, R.B., 1968. Multiple regression in psychological research and practice. Psychological Bulletin, 69 (3), 161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, C., Cao, X.J., and Næss, P., 2018. Applying gradient boosting decision trees to examine non-linear effects of the built environment on driving distance in Oslo. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 110, 107–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eldin, N.N. and Senouci, A.B., 1995. Condition rating of rigid pavements by neural networks. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 22 (5), 861–870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elith, J., Leathwick, J.R., and Hastie, T., 2008. A working guide to boosted regression trees. Journal of Animal Ecology, 77 (4), 802–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farid, D.M., et al., 2014. Hybrid decision tree and naïve Bayes classifiers for multi-class classification tasks. Expert Systems with Applications, 41 (4), 1937–1946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farris, D., 2017. How does weather effect asphalt pavement? Available from: http://bitroads.com/About-Us/Blog/entryid/6/how-does-weather-effect-asphalt-pavement [Accessed 23 August 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Freund, Y. and Schapire, R.E., 1996. Experiments with a new boosting algorithm. In: Machine learning: proceedings of the thirteenth international conference, 96, 148–156.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, J.H., 2001. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, 29 (5), 1189–1232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendreau, M. and Soriano, P., 1998. Airport pavement management systems: an appraisal of existing methodologies. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 32 (3), 197–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, K. and Shekharan, A., 1998. Updates of pavement performance modeling. In: 3rd International conference on road & airfield pavement technology, proceedings. Beijing: Huajie International Publishing Co Ltd, 402–410.
   Google Scholar
• Gerardi, T., et al., 2007. Airfield concrete pavement smoothness: a handbook. Rep. IPRF, 2002–4.
   Google Scholar
• Golabi, K., Kulkarni, R.B., and Way, G.B., 1982. A statewide pavement management system. Interfaces, 12 (6), 5–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorripaty, S., et al., 2017. Identifying similar days for air traffic management. Journal of Air Transport Management, 65, 144–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwell, B.M., Boehmke, B.C., and McCarthy, A.J., 2018. A simple and effective model-based variable importance measure. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.04755.
   Google Scholar
• Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., and Friedman, J., 2009. The elements of statistical learning. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Heaton, J., 2008. Introduction to neural networks with Java. St. Louis: Heaton Research, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, F. and Prozzi, J.A., 2006. Estimation of pavement performance deterioration using Bayesian approach. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 12 (2), 77–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y., Saito, M., and Sinha, K.C., 1988. Bridge performance prediction model using the Markov chain. Transportation Research Record, 1180, 31–39.
   Google Scholar
• Kargah-Ostadi, N., Stoffels, S., and Tabatabaee, N., 2010. Network-level pavement roughness prediction model for rehabilitation recommendations. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2155, 124–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koren, Y., 2009. The bellkor solution to the netflix grand prize. Netflix Prize Documentation, 81, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, D. and Derrible, S., 2019. Predicting residential water consumption: modeling techniques and data perspectives. ASCE Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, in press.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D., Derrible, S., and Pereira, F.C., 2018. Comparison of four types of artificial neural network and a multinomial logit model for travel mode choice modeling. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2672 (49), 101–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J.D., Yau, J.T., and Hsiao, L.H., 2003. Correlation analysis between international roughness index (IRI) and pavement distress by neural network. In: 82th Transportation research board annual meeting, (CD-ROM). Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Lou, Z., Lu, J.J., and Gunaratne, M., 1999. Road surface crack condition forecasting using neural network models. Final report for Florida State department of transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, X., et al., 2017. Prioritizing influential factors for freeway incident clearance time prediction using the gradient boosting decision trees method. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 18 (9), 2303–2310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madanat, S., Bulusu, S., and Mahmoud, A., 1995b. Estimation of infrastructure distress initiation and progression models. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 1 (3), 146–150.
   Google Scholar
• Madanat, S. and Ibrahim, W.H.W., 1995. Poisson regression models of infrastructure transition probabilities. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 121 (3), 267–272.
   Google Scholar
• Madanat, S.M., Karlaftis, M.G., and McCarthy, P.S., 1997. Probabilistic infrastructure deterioration models with panel data. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 3 (1), 4–9.
   Google Scholar
• Madanat, S., Mishalani, R., and Ibrahim, W.H.W., 1995a. Estimation of infrastructure transition probabilities from condition rating data. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 1 (2), 120–125.
   Google Scholar
• Mauch, M. and Madanat, S., 2001. Semiparametric hazard rate models of reinforced concrete bridge deck deterioration. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 7 (2), 49–57.
   Google Scholar
• Mishalani, R.G. and Madanat, S.M., 2002. Computation of infrastructure transition probabilities using stochastic duration models. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 8 (4), 139–148.
   Google Scholar
• Nakat, Z.S. and Madanat, S.M., 2008. Stochastic duration modeling of pavement overlay crack initiation. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 14 (3), 185–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natekin, A. and Knoll, A., 2013. Gradient boosting machines, a tutorial. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 7, 21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazari, F., et al., 2017. Optimal facility-specific inspection and maintenance decisions under measurement uncertainty: Unifying framework. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 23 (4), 04017036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, A., 2018. coursera.org. Available from: https://www.coursera.org/learn/machine-learning [Accessed 25 June 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Noruzoliaee, M. and Zou, B., 2015. Protecting the airfield assets at O’Hare International Airport: capability enhancement for predicting future runway pavement performance. Technical report. Prepared for the Chicago Department of Aviation. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.19882.16326.
   Google Scholar
• Noruzoliaee, M. and Zou, B., 2017. Protecting the airfield assets at O’Hare International Airport: developing prediction capability for taxiway pavement conditions and review of federal guidelines and state-of-the-practice in airfield assets condition rating. Technical report. Prepared for the Chicago Department of Aviation. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.16526.72007.
   Google Scholar
• Noruzoliaee, M. and Zou, B., 2019. Airfield infrastructure management using network-level optimization and stochastic duration modeling. Infrastructures, 4 (1), 2.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz-García, J.J., Costello, S., and Snaith, M.S., 2006. Derivation of transition probability matrices for pavement deterioration modeling. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 132 (2), 141–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owusu-Ababio, S., 1998. Application of neural networks to modeling thick asphalt pavement performance. In: A.A. Balkema, ed. Artificial intelligence and mathematical methods in pavement and geomechanical systems. Rotterdam: CRC Press, 23–30.
   Google Scholar
• Pindyck, R.S. and Rubinfeld, D.L., 1998. Econometric models and economic forecasts. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Prozzi, J. and Madanat, S, 2000. Using duration models to analyze experimental pavement failure data. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1699, 87–94.
   Google Scholar
• Regue, R. and Recker, W., 2014. Proactive vehicle routing with inferred demand to solve the bikesharing rebalancing problem. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 72, 192–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, C.W., 1993. Infrastructure condition forecasting using neural networks. Proceedings of Infrastructure Planning and Management, 282–284. American Society of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Shahnazari, H., et al., 2012. Application of soft computing for prediction of pavement condition index. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 138 (12), 1495–1506.
   Google Scholar
• Shekharan, A.R., 2000. Pavement performance prediction by artificial neural networks. In: A.A. Balkema, ed. Computational intelligence applications in pavement and geomechanical systems. Rotterdam: CRC Press, 89–98.
   Google Scholar
• Straub, D., 2009. Stochastic modeling of deterioration processes through dynamic Bayesian networks. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 135 (10), 1089–1099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabatabaee, N., Ziyadi, M., and Shafahi, Y., 2013. Two-stage support vector classifier and recurrent neural network predictor for pavement performance modeling. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 19 (3), 266–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Gryp, A., et al., 1998. Determining the visual condition index of flexible pavements using artificial neural networks. In: 4th International conference on managing pavements, 115–129.
   Google Scholar
• Vlahogianni, E.I., Karlaftis, M.G., and Golias, J.C., 2014. Short-term traffic forecasting: where we are and where we’re going. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 43, 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgama Wellalage, N., Zhang, T., and Dwight, R., 2015. Calibrating Markov chain-based deterioration models for predicting future conditions of railway bridge elements. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 20 (2), 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., 2004. Road crack condition performance modeling using recurrent Markov chains and artificial neural networks. Dissertation (PhD), University of South Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. and Haghani, A., 2015. A gradient boosting method to improve travel time prediction. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 58, 308–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Z.H., 2012. Ensemble methods: foundations and algorithms. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Zou, B. and Madanat, S, 2012. Incorporating delay effects into airport runway pavement management Systems. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 18 (3), 183–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar