Benefit maximisation based on aggregated condition indices: drawbacks for selection of pavement treatments

References

• AASHTO, 2012. Pavement management guide. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Qadi, I.L., Buttlar, W.G., and Baek, J., 2009. Cost-effectiveness and performance of overlay systems in Illinois. Volume 2: guidelines for interlayer system selection decision when used in HMA overlays. Report no. FHWA-ICT-09-045. Urbana, IL: Illinois Center for Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Anastasopoulos, P.C. and Mannering, F.L., 2015. Analysis of pavement overlay and replacement performance using random parameters hazard-based duration models. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 21 (1), 04014024. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birbaum, J., 2016. Entwicklung eines Verfahrens zur Ermittlung der Lebenszykluskosten von Straßen in Asphaltbauweise [Development of a procedure to determine the life-cycle-costs of asphalt roads]. Dissertation (PhD). Universität Siegen (in German).
   Google Scholar
• Brozek, B., Litzka, J., and Weninger-Vycudil, A., 2009. Entwicklung eines Nutzerkostenmoduls im österreichischen PMS [Development of a user cost module in the Austrian pavement management system]. Wien: BMVIT, Straßenforschung Heft 585 (in German).
   Google Scholar
• Cuelho, E., Mokwa, R., and Akin, M., 2006. Preventive maintenance treatments of flexible pavements: a synthesis of highway practice. Report no. FHWA/MT-06-009/8117-26. Helena, MT: Montana Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Donev, V. and Hoffmann, M., 2018a. Comparison of optimization approaches for pavement maintenance and rehabilitation policies on road section and network level. In: 6th international symposium on life -cycle civil engineering (IALCCE2018), 28–31 October, Ghent.
   Google Scholar
• Donev, V. and Hoffmann, M., 2018b. Optimisation of pavement maintenance and rehabilitation activities, timing and work zones for short survey sections and multiple distress types. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2018.1502433.
   Google Scholar
• Farid, F., et al., 1994. Feasibility of incremental benefit-cost analysis for optimal budget allocation in bridge management systems. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1442, 77–87.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, A., Picado-Santos, L., and Antunes, A., 2002. A segment-linked optimization model for deterministic pavement management systems. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 3 (2), 95–105. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10298430290030603
   Google Scholar
• FHWA, 1998. Pavement management systems. FHWA report HI-97-024. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, K.M., et al., 2012. Estimating life expectancies of highway assets, volume 2: final report. NCHRP report no. 713. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Forrest, J. and Lougee-Heimer, R., 2005. CBC user guide. INFORMS TutORials in Operations Research, 257–277.
   Google Scholar
• Gharaibeh, N. G., Zou, Y., and Saliminejad, S., 2010. Assessing the agreement among pavement condition indexes. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 136 (8), 765–772. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000141
   Google Scholar
• Haas, R., et al., 1985. Pavement rehabilitation programming: a range of options. In: 1st North American pavement management conference, 18–21 March, Toronto, Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, R., Hudson, W.R., and Falls, L.C., 2015. Birth and teen years of pavement management (1967–1987). In: R. Haas, W.R. Hudson, and L.C. Falls, eds. Pavement asset management. Salem, MA: Scrivener, 5–13.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, R., Hudson, W.R., and Zaniewski, J., 1994. Modern pavement management. Malabar, FL: Krieger.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, K.T., et al., 2001. Rehabilitation strategies for highway pavements. NCHRP project C1-38: conctractor’s final report. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, F.S. and Lieberman, G.J., 2015. Introduction to operations research. 10th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Irfan, M., et al., 2012. Scale and condition economies in asset preservation cost functions: case study involving flexible pavement treatments. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 138 (2), 218–228. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000323
   Google Scholar
• Javed, F., 2011. Integrated prioritization and optimization approach for pavement management. Thesis (PhD). University of Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Juster, R.D. and Pecknold, W.M., 1976. Improving the process of programming transportation investments. Transportation Research Record, 599, 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Keleman, M., et al., 2008. Pavement management manual. Denver, CO: Colorado Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Kerali, H.R. and Mannisto, V., 1999. Prioritization methods for strategic planning and road work programming in a new highway development and management tool. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1655, 49–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.3141/1655-08
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, K.D., 2012. Pavement network maintenance optimization considering multidimensional condition data. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 18 (4), 220–277. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lea, J., Harvey, J., and Tseng, E., 2014. Aggregating and modeling automated pavement condition survey data for flexible pavements for use in pavement management. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2455, 89–97. doi: https://doi.org/10.3141/2455-10
   Google Scholar
• Li, N., Haas, R., and Huot, M., 1998. Integer programming of maintenance and rehabilitation treatments for pavement networks. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1629, 242–248. doi: https://doi.org/10.3141/1629-27
   Google Scholar
• Maerschalk, G., and Socina, M., 2008. Weiterentwicklung der Bewertung des pavement management systems (PMS) um ein Verfahren für die Umsetzung von Qualitätszielen [Extension of the evaluation functions of the pavement management system (PMS) by a system for the implementation of quality goals]. Forschung Straßenbau und Straßenverkehrstechnik, Heft 1001. Bonn: Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung (in German).
   Google Scholar
• Mason, A.J., 2012. Opensolver – an open source add-in to solve linear and integer progammes in Excel. In: D. Klatte, H.-J. Lüthi, and K. Schmedders, eds. Operations research proceedings 2011. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 401–406.
   Google Scholar
• MDOT, 2019. Transportation asset management plan. Saint Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Menendez, J.R., et al., 2013. Prioritizing infrastructure maintenance and rehabilitation activities under various budgetary scenarios: evaluation of worst-first and benefit-cost analysis approaches. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2361, 56–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.3141/2361-07
   Google Scholar
• Nobakht, M., et al., 2016. Mechanistic-empirical methodology for the selection of cost-effective rehabilitation strategy for flexible pavements. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2016.1199878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odoki, J.B. and Kerali, H.G.R., 2000. Analytical framework and model descriptions. The highway development and management series, volume 4. Paris: World Road Association (PIARC).
   Google Scholar
• Patidar, V., et al., 2011. Evaluating methods and algorithms for multicriteria bridge management at the network level. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2220, 38–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.3141/2220-05
   Google Scholar
• Peng, F. and Ouyang, Y., 2010. Pavement program planning based on multi-year cost-effectiveness analysis. Report no. FHWA-ICT-10-067. Springfield, IL: Illinois Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Qiao, Y., et al., 2019. Costs and effectiveness of standard treatments applied to flexible and rigid pavements: case study in Indiana, USA. Infrastructure Asset Management, 6 (1), 15–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/jinam.17.00035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheinberg, T. and Anastasopoulos, P.C., 2010. Pavement preservation programming: a multi-year multi-constraint optimization methodology. In: 89th annual meeting of the transportation research board, 10–14 January, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, Y.U., Jain, S.S., and Parida, M, 2014. Evaluation of prioritization methods for effective pavement maintenance of urban roads. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 15 (3), 238–250. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2012.657798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahin, M.Y., et al., 1985. Pavement M&R budget optimization using the incremental benefit-cost technique. In: 1st North American pavement management conference, 18–21 March, Toronto, Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P.D., et al., 1998. The Pontis bridge management system. Structural Engineering International, 8 (4), 303–308. doi: https://doi.org/10.2749/101686698780488758
   Google Scholar
• Wang, F., Zhang, Z., and Machemehl, R.B., 2003. Decision-making problem for managing pavement maintenance and rehabilitation projects. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1853, 21–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.3141/1853-03
   Google Scholar
• Weninger-Vycudil, A., 2001. Entwicklung von Systemelementen für ein österreichisches pavement management system [Development of system elements for the Austrian pavement management system]. Thesis (PhD). Technische Universität Wien (in German).
   Google Scholar
• Weninger-Vycudil, A., et al., 2009. Handbuch pavement management in Österreich 2009 [Manual pavement management in Austria 2009]. Straßenforschung, Heft 584. Wien: Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Innovation und Technologie (in German).
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Z. and Flintsch, G.W., 2009. Pavement preservation optimization considering multiple objectives and budget variability. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 135 (5), 305–315. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, J. and Garcia-Diaz, A., 2008. Cost-effective selection and multi-period scheduling of pavement maintenance and rehabilitation strategies. Engineering Optimization, 40 (3), 205–222. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03052150701686937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, B, et al., 2015. Multi-objective optimization for asphalt pavement maintenance plans at project level: Integrating performance, cost and environment. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 41, 64–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.09.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavitski, J.L., Rose, R.T., and Kuhl, G., 2008. Integrating pavement management into a comprehensive strategic asset management system for the state of Utah Department of Transportation. In: 7th international conference on managing pavement assets, 23–28 June, Calgary, Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Zuniga-Garcia, N., et al., 2018. Economic analysis of pavement preservation techniques. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2672 (12), 10–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118768515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar