647
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Effect of additives and aging on moisture-induced damage potential of asphalt mixes using surface free energy and laboratory-based performance tests

ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, &
Pages 285-296 | Received 09 Nov 2019, Accepted 09 Mar 2020, Published online: 19 Mar 2020

References

  • AASHTO, 2014. AASHTO t 283: standard method of test for resistance of compacted asphalt mixtures to moisture-induced damage. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
  • AASHTO, 2015a. AASHTO r 30: standard practice for mixture conditioning of hot mix asphalt (HMA). Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
  • AASHTO, 2015b. AASHTO t 312: standard method of test for preparing and determining the density of asphalt mixture specimens by means of the superpave gyratory compactor. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
  • AASHTO, 2016. AASHTO r 28: standard practice for accelerated aging of asphalt binder using a pressurized aging vessel (PAV). Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
  • AASHTO, 2017. AASHTO t 240: standard method of test for effect of Heat and Air on a Moving film of asphalt binder (rolling thin-film oven test). Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
  • AASHTO, 2018. AASHTO TP 124: standard method of test for determining the fracture potential of asphalt Mixtures using the flexibility index test (FIT). Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
  • Abuawad, I. M., Al-Qadi, I. L., and Trepanier, J. S, 2015. Mitigation of moisture damage in asphalt concrete: testing techniques and additives/modifiers effectiveness. Construction and Building Materials, 84, 437–443.
  • Aguiar-Moya, J. P., et al., 2015. Effect of aging on adhesion properties of asphalt mixtures with the use of bitumen bond strength and surface energy measurement tests. Transportation Research Record, 2505 (1), 57–65.
  • Al-Qadi, I. L., et al., 2014. Effects of various asphalt binder additives/modifiers on moisture-susceptible asphaltic mixtures. Illinois Center for Transportation, 0197–9191.
  • Al-Qadi, I. L., et al., 2015. Testing protocols to ensure performance of high asphalt binder replacement mixes using RAP and RAS. Illinois Center for Transportation/Illinois Department of Transportation, 0197-9191.
  • Alvarez, A. E., Ovalles, E., and Caro, S., 2012. Assessment of the effect of mineral filler on asphalt–aggregate interfaces based on thermodynamic properties. Construction and Building Materials, 28 (1), 599–606.
  • Alvarez, A. E., Ovalles, E., and Martin, A. E., 2012. Comparison of asphalt rubber-aggregate and polymer modified asphalt–aggregate systems in terms of surface free energy and energy indices. Construction and Building Materials, 35, 385–392.
  • Arabani, M., and Hamedi, G. H, 2014. Using the surface free energy method to evaluate the effects of polymeric aggregate treatment on moisture damage in hot-mix asphalt. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 15 (1), 66–78.
  • ASTM, 2013. ASTM d7870: standard practice for moisture conditioning compacted asphalt mixture specimens by using hydrostatic pore pressure. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
  • Bagampadde, U., Isacsson, U., and Kiggundu, B, 2006. Impact of bitumen and aggregate composition on stripping in bituminous mixtures. Materials and Structures, 39 (3), 303–315.
  • Bhasin, A., et al., 2006. Limits on adhesive bond energy for improved resistance of hot-mix asphalt to moisture damage. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1970, 3–13.
  • Bhasin, A., et al., 2007a. Effect of modification processes on bond energy of asphalt binders. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1998, 29–37.
  • Bhasin, A., et al., 2007b. Surface free energy to Identify moisture sensitivity of materials for asphalt mixes. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2001, 37–45.
  • Bhasin, A., 2007. Development of methods to quantify bitumen-aggregate adhesion and loss of adhesion due to water. College Station, Texas: Texas A&M University.
  • Bhasin, A. and Little, D. N., 2006. Characterizing Surface Properties of Aggregates Used in Hot Mix Asphalt (Rsearch Report ICAR –505-2). Austin, Texas: International Center for Aggregate Research.
  • Bhasin, A., and Little, D. N, 2007. Characterization of aggregate surface energy using the universal sorption device. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 19 (8), 634–641.
  • Buddhala, A., et al., 2011. Effects of an amine anti-stripping agent on moisture susceptibility of Sasobit and Aspha-min mixes by surface free energy analysis. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 40 (1), 91–99.
  • Caro, S., et al., 2008a. Moisture susceptibility of asphalt mixtures, part 1: mechanisms. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 9 (2), 81–98.
  • Caro, S., et al., 2008b. Moisture susceptibility of asphalt mixtures, part 2: characterisation and modelling. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 9 (2), 99–114.
  • Cooper III, S. B., et al., 2014. Balanced asphalt mixture design through specification modification: Louisiana's experience. Transportation Research Record, 2447 (1), 92–100.
  • Ghabchi, R., et al., 2013. Mechanistic evaluation of the effect of WMA additives on wettability and moisture susceptibility properties of asphalt mixes. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 41 (6), 933–942.
  • Ghabchi, R, 2014. Laboratory characterization of recycled and warm mix asphalt for enhanced pavement applications. Dissertation (PhD). University of Oklahoma.
  • Ghabchi, R., et al., 2016. Comparison of laboratory performance of asphalt mixes containing different proportions of RAS and RAP. Construction and Building Materials, 124, 343–351.
  • Ghabchi, R., Singh, D., and Zaman, M, 2014. Evaluation of moisture susceptibility of asphalt mixes containing RAP and different types of aggregates and asphalt binders using the surface free energy method. Construction and Building Materials, 73, 479–489.
  • Ghabchi, R., Singh, D., and Zaman, M, 2015. Laboratory evaluation of stiffness, low-temperature cracking, rutting, moisture damage, and fatigue performance of WMA mixes. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 16 (2), 334–357.
  • Gorkem, C., and Sengoz, B, 2009. Predicting stripping and moisture induced damage of asphalt concrete prepared with polymer modified bitumen and hydrated lime. Construction and Building Materials, 23 (6), 2227–2236.
  • Harvey, J. T., and Lu, Q., 2005. Investigation of conditions for moisture damage in asphalt concrete and appropriate laboratory test methods.
  • Hefer, A. W., Bhasin, A., and Little, D. N, 2006. Bitumen surface energy characterization using a contact angle approach. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 18 (6), 759–767.
  • Hefer, A. W., Little, D. N., and Lytton, R. L, 2005. A synthesis of theories and mechanisms of bitumen-aggregate adhesion including recent advances in quantifying the effects of water. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 74, 139–196.
  • Kim, M., Mohammad, L., and Elseifi, M, 2012. Characterization of fracture properties of asphalt mixtures as measured by semicircular bend test and indirect tension test. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2296, 115–124.
  • Masad, E. A., et al., 2006. Characterization of HMA moisture damage using surface energy and fracture properties (with discussion). Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 75, 713–754.
  • Mirzababaei, P, 2016. Effect of Zycotherm on moisture susceptibility of warm mix asphalt mixtures prepared with different aggregate types and gradations. Construction and Building Materials, 116, 403–412.
  • Moghadas Nejad, F., Hamedi, G. H., and Azarhoosh, A., 2012. Use of surface free energy method to evaluate effect of hydrate lime on moisture damage in hot-mix asphalt. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 25 (8), 1119–1126.
  • Mohammad, L. N., Kim, M., and Challa, H., 2016. Development of performance-based specifications for Louisiana asphalt mixtures. Baton Rouge, Louisiana: Louisiana Transportation Research Center.
  • ODOT, 2009. 2009 standard specifications for highway construction. Oklahoma City: Oklahoma Department of Transportation.
  • Orange, G., et al., 2004. Rutting and moisture resistance of asphalt mixtures containing polymer and polyphosphoric acid modified bitumen. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 5 (3), 323–354.
  • Ozer, H., et al., 2016a. Development of the fracture-based flexibility index for asphalt concrete cracking potential using modified semi-circle bending test parameters. Construction and Building Materials, 115, 390–401.
  • Ozer, H., et al., 2016b. Fracture characterization of asphalt mixtures with high recycled content using Illinois semicircular bending test method and flexibility index. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2575, 130–137.
  • Rani, S., 2019. Characterization of rutting in asphalt pavements using laboratory testing (Ph.D. Dissertation). University of Oklahoma, Norman.
  • Reinke, G., and Glidden, S, 2010. Analytical procedures for determining phosphorus content in asphalt binders and impact of aggregate on quantitative recovery of phosphorus from asphalt binders. Asphalt Paving Technology-Proceedings Association of Asphalt Technologists, 79, 695.
  • Tan, Y., and Guo, M, 2013. Using surface free energy method to study the cohesion and adhesion of asphalt mastic. Construction and Building Materials, 47, 254–260.
  • Van Oss, C. J., Chaudhury, M. K., and Good, R. J., 1988. Interfacial Lifshitz-Van Der Waals and polar interactions in macroscopic systems. Chemical Reviews, 88 (6), 927–941.
  • Vargas-Nordcbeck, A., et al., 2016. Evaluating moisture susceptibility of asphalt concrete mixtures through simple performance tests. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2575, 70–78.
  • Wasiuddin, N. M., et al., 2007a. Characterization of thermal degradation of liquid amine anti-strip additives in asphalt binders due to RTFO and PAV-aging. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 35 (4), 387–394.
  • Wasiuddin, N. M., et al., 2007b. Characterization of thermal degradation of qa liquid amine anti-strip additives in asphalt qa binders due to RTFO and PAV-aging. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 35 (4), 387–394.
  • Wasiuddin, N. M., et al., 2007c. Effect of antistrip additives on surface free energy characteristics of asphalt binders for moisture-induced damage potential. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 35 (1), 36–44.
  • Wasiuddin, N., Zaman, M., and O'Rear, E, 2008. Effect of Sasobit and Aspha-min on wettability and adhesion between Asphalt binders and aggregates. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2051, 80–89.
  • Zhang, D., and Liu, H, 2018. Proposed approach for determining consistent energy parameters based on the surface free energy theory. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 30 (11), 04018287.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.